Cargando…
An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study
Blood hemoglobin (Hb) is a common indicator for diagnosing anemia and is often determined through laboratory analysis of venous samples. One alternative to laboratory-based methods is the handheld HemoCue® Hb 201+ device, which requires a finger prick and wicking of blood into a pretreated cuvette f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187663 |
_version_ | 1783290358844620800 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Megan Han, Zhen Abu-Haydar, Elizabeth Matsiko, Eric Iyakaremye, Damien Tuyisenge, Lisine Magaret, Amalia Lyambabaje, Alexandre |
author_facet | Parker, Megan Han, Zhen Abu-Haydar, Elizabeth Matsiko, Eric Iyakaremye, Damien Tuyisenge, Lisine Magaret, Amalia Lyambabaje, Alexandre |
author_sort | Parker, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blood hemoglobin (Hb) is a common indicator for diagnosing anemia and is often determined through laboratory analysis of venous samples. One alternative to laboratory-based methods is the handheld HemoCue® Hb 201+ device, which requires a finger prick and wicking of blood into a pretreated cuvette for analysis. An alternative HemoCue® gravity method is being investigated for improved accuracy. Further, recent developments in noninvasive technologies could provide an accurate, rapid, safe, point-of-care option for hemoglobin estimation while addressing some limitations of current tools, but device performance must be assessed in low-resource settings. This study evaluated the performance of two HemoCue® Hb 201+ blood sampling methods and a noninvasive device (Pronto® with DCI-mini™ sensors) in a Rwandan pediatric clinic. Reference hemoglobin values were determined in 132 children 6 to 59 months of age by using a standard hematology analyzer (Sysmex KN21(TM)). Half were tested using the HemoCue® wicking method; half were tested using the HemoCue® gravity method; and 112 had successful hemoglobin readings with Pronto® DCI-mini™. Statistical analysis was used to assess the level of bias generated by each method and the key drivers of bias. The HemoCue® gravity method was the least biased. The HemoCue® wicking and Pronto® methods biases were inversely related to the Sysmex KN21(TM) results. Both HemoCue® sampling methods correctly classified patients’ anemic status in 80% or more of instances, whereas the Pronto® device had a correct classification rate of only 69%. The HemoCue® gravity method was more accurate than the traditional HemoCue® wicking method in this study, but its accuracy and operational feasibility should be confirmed by future studies. The Pronto® DCI-mini™ devices showed considerable promise but require further improvements in sensitivity and specificity before wider adoption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5754049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57540492018-01-26 An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study Parker, Megan Han, Zhen Abu-Haydar, Elizabeth Matsiko, Eric Iyakaremye, Damien Tuyisenge, Lisine Magaret, Amalia Lyambabaje, Alexandre PLoS One Research Article Blood hemoglobin (Hb) is a common indicator for diagnosing anemia and is often determined through laboratory analysis of venous samples. One alternative to laboratory-based methods is the handheld HemoCue® Hb 201+ device, which requires a finger prick and wicking of blood into a pretreated cuvette for analysis. An alternative HemoCue® gravity method is being investigated for improved accuracy. Further, recent developments in noninvasive technologies could provide an accurate, rapid, safe, point-of-care option for hemoglobin estimation while addressing some limitations of current tools, but device performance must be assessed in low-resource settings. This study evaluated the performance of two HemoCue® Hb 201+ blood sampling methods and a noninvasive device (Pronto® with DCI-mini™ sensors) in a Rwandan pediatric clinic. Reference hemoglobin values were determined in 132 children 6 to 59 months of age by using a standard hematology analyzer (Sysmex KN21(TM)). Half were tested using the HemoCue® wicking method; half were tested using the HemoCue® gravity method; and 112 had successful hemoglobin readings with Pronto® DCI-mini™. Statistical analysis was used to assess the level of bias generated by each method and the key drivers of bias. The HemoCue® gravity method was the least biased. The HemoCue® wicking and Pronto® methods biases were inversely related to the Sysmex KN21(TM) results. Both HemoCue® sampling methods correctly classified patients’ anemic status in 80% or more of instances, whereas the Pronto® device had a correct classification rate of only 69%. The HemoCue® gravity method was more accurate than the traditional HemoCue® wicking method in this study, but its accuracy and operational feasibility should be confirmed by future studies. The Pronto® DCI-mini™ devices showed considerable promise but require further improvements in sensitivity and specificity before wider adoption. Public Library of Science 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5754049/ /pubmed/29300737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187663 Text en © 2018 Parker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parker, Megan Han, Zhen Abu-Haydar, Elizabeth Matsiko, Eric Iyakaremye, Damien Tuyisenge, Lisine Magaret, Amalia Lyambabaje, Alexandre An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title | An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title_full | An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title_short | An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study |
title_sort | evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in rwanda: a randomized study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkermegan anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT hanzhen anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT abuhaydarelizabeth anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT matsikoeric anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT iyakaremyedamien anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT tuyisengelisine anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT magaretamalia anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT lyambabajealexandre anevaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT parkermegan evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT hanzhen evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT abuhaydarelizabeth evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT matsikoeric evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT iyakaremyedamien evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT tuyisengelisine evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT magaretamalia evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy AT lyambabajealexandre evaluationofhemoglobinmeasurementtoolsandtheiraccuracyandreliabilitywhenscreeningforchildanemiainrwandaarandomizedstudy |