Cargando…

Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries

The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lackin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Goor, Ien, Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija, Syed, Ahmed, Juel Lau, Cathrine, Sandu, Petru, Spitters, Hilde, Eklund Karlsson, Leena, Dulf, Diana, Valente, Adriana, Castellani, Tommaso, Aro, Arja R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003
_version_ 1783290389410611200
author van de Goor, Ien
Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Syed, Ahmed
Juel Lau, Cathrine
Sandu, Petru
Spitters, Hilde
Eklund Karlsson, Leena
Dulf, Diana
Valente, Adriana
Castellani, Tommaso
Aro, Arja R.
author_facet van de Goor, Ien
Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Syed, Ahmed
Juel Lau, Cathrine
Sandu, Petru
Spitters, Hilde
Eklund Karlsson, Leena
Dulf, Diana
Valente, Adriana
Castellani, Tommaso
Aro, Arja R.
author_sort van de Goor, Ien
collection PubMed
description The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lacking the most effective approaches, thus limiting the impact of health promotion strategies. This article focuses on facilitators and barriers in the use of evidence in developing health enhancing physical activity policies. Data was collected in 2012 by interviewing 86 key stakeholders from six EU countries (FI, DK, UK, NL, IT, RO) using a common topic guide. Content analysis and concept mapping was used to construct a map of facilitators and barriers. Barriers and facilitators experienced by most stakeholders and policy context in each country are analysed. A lack of locally useful and concrete evidence, evidence on costs, and a lack of joint understanding were specific hindrances. Also users’ characteristics and the role media play were identified as factors of influence. Attention for individual and social factors within the policy context might provide the key to enhance more sustainable evidence use. Developing and evaluating tailored approaches impacting on networking, personal relationships, collaboration and evidence coproduction is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5754321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Scientific Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57543212018-01-10 Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries van de Goor, Ien Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Syed, Ahmed Juel Lau, Cathrine Sandu, Petru Spitters, Hilde Eklund Karlsson, Leena Dulf, Diana Valente, Adriana Castellani, Tommaso Aro, Arja R. Health Policy Article The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lacking the most effective approaches, thus limiting the impact of health promotion strategies. This article focuses on facilitators and barriers in the use of evidence in developing health enhancing physical activity policies. Data was collected in 2012 by interviewing 86 key stakeholders from six EU countries (FI, DK, UK, NL, IT, RO) using a common topic guide. Content analysis and concept mapping was used to construct a map of facilitators and barriers. Barriers and facilitators experienced by most stakeholders and policy context in each country are analysed. A lack of locally useful and concrete evidence, evidence on costs, and a lack of joint understanding were specific hindrances. Also users’ characteristics and the role media play were identified as factors of influence. Attention for individual and social factors within the policy context might provide the key to enhance more sustainable evidence use. Developing and evaluating tailored approaches impacting on networking, personal relationships, collaboration and evidence coproduction is recommended. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5754321/ /pubmed/28139253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van de Goor, Ien
Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija
Syed, Ahmed
Juel Lau, Cathrine
Sandu, Petru
Spitters, Hilde
Eklund Karlsson, Leena
Dulf, Diana
Valente, Adriana
Castellani, Tommaso
Aro, Arja R.
Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title_full Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title_fullStr Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title_short Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
title_sort determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: results from a study across six eu countries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT vandegoorien determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT hamalainenriittamaija determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT syedahmed determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT juellaucathrine determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT sandupetru determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT spittershilde determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT eklundkarlssonleena determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT dulfdiana determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT valenteadriana determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT castellanitommaso determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT aroarjar determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries
AT determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries