Cargando…
Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries
The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lackin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Scientific Publishers
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003 |
_version_ | 1783290389410611200 |
---|---|
author | van de Goor, Ien Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Syed, Ahmed Juel Lau, Cathrine Sandu, Petru Spitters, Hilde Eklund Karlsson, Leena Dulf, Diana Valente, Adriana Castellani, Tommaso Aro, Arja R. |
author_facet | van de Goor, Ien Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Syed, Ahmed Juel Lau, Cathrine Sandu, Petru Spitters, Hilde Eklund Karlsson, Leena Dulf, Diana Valente, Adriana Castellani, Tommaso Aro, Arja R. |
author_sort | van de Goor, Ien |
collection | PubMed |
description | The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lacking the most effective approaches, thus limiting the impact of health promotion strategies. This article focuses on facilitators and barriers in the use of evidence in developing health enhancing physical activity policies. Data was collected in 2012 by interviewing 86 key stakeholders from six EU countries (FI, DK, UK, NL, IT, RO) using a common topic guide. Content analysis and concept mapping was used to construct a map of facilitators and barriers. Barriers and facilitators experienced by most stakeholders and policy context in each country are analysed. A lack of locally useful and concrete evidence, evidence on costs, and a lack of joint understanding were specific hindrances. Also users’ characteristics and the role media play were identified as factors of influence. Attention for individual and social factors within the policy context might provide the key to enhance more sustainable evidence use. Developing and evaluating tailored approaches impacting on networking, personal relationships, collaboration and evidence coproduction is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5754321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier Scientific Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57543212018-01-10 Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries van de Goor, Ien Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Syed, Ahmed Juel Lau, Cathrine Sandu, Petru Spitters, Hilde Eklund Karlsson, Leena Dulf, Diana Valente, Adriana Castellani, Tommaso Aro, Arja R. Health Policy Article The knowledge-practice gap in public health is widely known. The importance of using different types of evidence for the development of effective health promotion has also been emphasized. Nevertheless, in practice, intervention decisions are often based on perceived short-term opportunities, lacking the most effective approaches, thus limiting the impact of health promotion strategies. This article focuses on facilitators and barriers in the use of evidence in developing health enhancing physical activity policies. Data was collected in 2012 by interviewing 86 key stakeholders from six EU countries (FI, DK, UK, NL, IT, RO) using a common topic guide. Content analysis and concept mapping was used to construct a map of facilitators and barriers. Barriers and facilitators experienced by most stakeholders and policy context in each country are analysed. A lack of locally useful and concrete evidence, evidence on costs, and a lack of joint understanding were specific hindrances. Also users’ characteristics and the role media play were identified as factors of influence. Attention for individual and social factors within the policy context might provide the key to enhance more sustainable evidence use. Developing and evaluating tailored approaches impacting on networking, personal relationships, collaboration and evidence coproduction is recommended. Elsevier Scientific Publishers 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5754321/ /pubmed/28139253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article van de Goor, Ien Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Syed, Ahmed Juel Lau, Cathrine Sandu, Petru Spitters, Hilde Eklund Karlsson, Leena Dulf, Diana Valente, Adriana Castellani, Tommaso Aro, Arja R. Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title | Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title_full | Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title_fullStr | Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title_short | Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries |
title_sort | determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: results from a study across six eu countries |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandegoorien determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT hamalainenriittamaija determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT syedahmed determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT juellaucathrine determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT sandupetru determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT spittershilde determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT eklundkarlssonleena determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT dulfdiana determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT valenteadriana determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT castellanitommaso determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT aroarjar determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries AT determinantsofevidenceuseinpublichealthpolicymakingresultsfromastudyacrosssixeucountries |