Cargando…

A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME

INTRODUCTION: Disturbance to the hindgut microbiota can be detrimental to equine health. Metabolomics provides a robust approach to studying the functional aspect of hindgut microorganisms. Sample preparation is an important step towards achieving optimal results in the later stages of analysis. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hough, Rachael, Archer, Debra, Probert, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-017-1315-7
_version_ 1783290403460481024
author Hough, Rachael
Archer, Debra
Probert, Christopher
author_facet Hough, Rachael
Archer, Debra
Probert, Christopher
author_sort Hough, Rachael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Disturbance to the hindgut microbiota can be detrimental to equine health. Metabolomics provides a robust approach to studying the functional aspect of hindgut microorganisms. Sample preparation is an important step towards achieving optimal results in the later stages of analysis. The preparation of samples is unique depending on the technique employed and the sample matrix to be analysed. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) is one of the most widely used platforms for the study of metabolomics and until now an optimised method has not been developed for equine faeces. OBJECTIVES: To compare a sample preparation method for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces. METHODS: Volatile organic compounds were determined by headspace solid phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GCMS). Factors investigated were the mass of equine faeces, type of SPME fibre coating, vial volume and storage conditions. RESULTS: The resultant method was unique to those developed for other species. Aliquots of 1000 or 2000 mg in 10 ml or 20 ml SPME headspace were optimal. From those tested, the extraction of VOCs should ideally be performed using a divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethysiloxane (DVB-CAR-PDMS) SPME fibre. Storage of faeces for up to 12 months at − 80 °C shared a greater percentage of VOCs with a fresh sample than the equivalent stored at − 20 °C. CONCLUSIONS: An optimised method for extracting VOCs from equine faeces using HS-SPME-GCMS has been developed and will act as a standard to enable comparisons between studies. This work has also highlighted storage conditions as an important factor to consider in experimental design for faecal metabolomics studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11306-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5754382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57543822018-01-22 A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME Hough, Rachael Archer, Debra Probert, Christopher Metabolomics Original Article INTRODUCTION: Disturbance to the hindgut microbiota can be detrimental to equine health. Metabolomics provides a robust approach to studying the functional aspect of hindgut microorganisms. Sample preparation is an important step towards achieving optimal results in the later stages of analysis. The preparation of samples is unique depending on the technique employed and the sample matrix to be analysed. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) is one of the most widely used platforms for the study of metabolomics and until now an optimised method has not been developed for equine faeces. OBJECTIVES: To compare a sample preparation method for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces. METHODS: Volatile organic compounds were determined by headspace solid phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GCMS). Factors investigated were the mass of equine faeces, type of SPME fibre coating, vial volume and storage conditions. RESULTS: The resultant method was unique to those developed for other species. Aliquots of 1000 or 2000 mg in 10 ml or 20 ml SPME headspace were optimal. From those tested, the extraction of VOCs should ideally be performed using a divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethysiloxane (DVB-CAR-PDMS) SPME fibre. Storage of faeces for up to 12 months at − 80 °C shared a greater percentage of VOCs with a fresh sample than the equivalent stored at − 20 °C. CONCLUSIONS: An optimised method for extracting VOCs from equine faeces using HS-SPME-GCMS has been developed and will act as a standard to enable comparisons between studies. This work has also highlighted storage conditions as an important factor to consider in experimental design for faecal metabolomics studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11306-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-01-04 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5754382/ /pubmed/29367839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-017-1315-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hough, Rachael
Archer, Debra
Probert, Christopher
A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title_full A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title_fullStr A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title_short A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME
title_sort comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (vocs) from equine faeces using hs-spme
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-017-1315-7
work_keys_str_mv AT houghrachael acomparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme
AT archerdebra acomparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme
AT probertchristopher acomparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme
AT houghrachael comparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme
AT archerdebra comparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme
AT probertchristopher comparisonofsamplepreparationmethodsforextractingvolatileorganiccompoundsvocsfromequinefaecesusinghsspme