Cargando…
Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives were to explore the views of women with recurrent stress incontinence (SUI) with regard to treatment preferences and the acceptability of randomisation to a future trial, and to survey the views of UK specialists on treatment preferences and equipoise rega...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3376-6 |
_version_ | 1783290405519884288 |
---|---|
author | Tincello, Douglas G. Armstrong, Natalie Hilton, Paul Buckley, Brian Mayne, Christopher |
author_facet | Tincello, Douglas G. Armstrong, Natalie Hilton, Paul Buckley, Brian Mayne, Christopher |
author_sort | Tincello, Douglas G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives were to explore the views of women with recurrent stress incontinence (SUI) with regard to treatment preferences and the acceptability of randomisation to a future trial, and to survey the views of UK specialists on treatment preferences and equipoise regarding different treatment alternatives. METHODS: An online survey of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and British Society of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) was carried out. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of surgeons and women suffering from recurrent SUI from three UK centres. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six survey replies were received (176 gynaecology; 80 urology). Comparing the treatments offered, urogynaecologists were more likely to offer pelvic floor exercises (p < 0.05), and repeat midurethral tape (MUT) (p < 0.001). From the Surgical Equipoise Scale (SES) responses, “no preference” was rarely the commonest response. Marked differences for several options existed; midurethral tape dominated responses whenever it appeared. Twenty-one clinicians were interviewed. Treatment preferences were complex, influenced by a range of factors (reason for failure, patient comorbidity, investigations, personal experience, training). A future trial was regarded as important. Eleven women were interviewed. Most had considered more than one option, but felt that decision-making was more a process of elimination rather than a positive process. Randomisation to a study was regarded as unacceptable by most. CONCLUSIONS: No consensus exists among surgeons about preferred treatment options for recurrent SUI, and personal experience and training dominate decision-making. For patients, choices were usually based on an elimination of options, including that of a repeat failed procedure. This contrasts with surgeons, who mostly preferred a repeat MUT above other options. Any future comparative study will be challenging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5754391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57543912018-01-30 Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women Tincello, Douglas G. Armstrong, Natalie Hilton, Paul Buckley, Brian Mayne, Christopher Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives were to explore the views of women with recurrent stress incontinence (SUI) with regard to treatment preferences and the acceptability of randomisation to a future trial, and to survey the views of UK specialists on treatment preferences and equipoise regarding different treatment alternatives. METHODS: An online survey of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and British Society of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) was carried out. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of surgeons and women suffering from recurrent SUI from three UK centres. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six survey replies were received (176 gynaecology; 80 urology). Comparing the treatments offered, urogynaecologists were more likely to offer pelvic floor exercises (p < 0.05), and repeat midurethral tape (MUT) (p < 0.001). From the Surgical Equipoise Scale (SES) responses, “no preference” was rarely the commonest response. Marked differences for several options existed; midurethral tape dominated responses whenever it appeared. Twenty-one clinicians were interviewed. Treatment preferences were complex, influenced by a range of factors (reason for failure, patient comorbidity, investigations, personal experience, training). A future trial was regarded as important. Eleven women were interviewed. Most had considered more than one option, but felt that decision-making was more a process of elimination rather than a positive process. Randomisation to a study was regarded as unacceptable by most. CONCLUSIONS: No consensus exists among surgeons about preferred treatment options for recurrent SUI, and personal experience and training dominate decision-making. For patients, choices were usually based on an elimination of options, including that of a repeat failed procedure. This contrasts with surgeons, who mostly preferred a repeat MUT above other options. Any future comparative study will be challenging. Springer London 2017-06-02 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5754391/ /pubmed/28577173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3376-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tincello, Douglas G. Armstrong, Natalie Hilton, Paul Buckley, Brian Mayne, Christopher Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title | Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title_full | Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title_fullStr | Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title_short | Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
title_sort | surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3376-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tincellodouglasg surgeryforrecurrentstressurinaryincontinencetheviewsofsurgeonsandwomen AT armstrongnatalie surgeryforrecurrentstressurinaryincontinencetheviewsofsurgeonsandwomen AT hiltonpaul surgeryforrecurrentstressurinaryincontinencetheviewsofsurgeonsandwomen AT buckleybrian surgeryforrecurrentstressurinaryincontinencetheviewsofsurgeonsandwomen AT maynechristopher surgeryforrecurrentstressurinaryincontinencetheviewsofsurgeonsandwomen |