Cargando…

A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery

Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Wei Wei, Zhang, Chu Yi, Li, Jian Yin, Zhang, Ming Fang, Guo, Zhu Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139
_version_ 1783290489657622528
author Liu, Wei Wei
Zhang, Chu Yi
Li, Jian Yin
Zhang, Ming Fang
Guo, Zhu Ming
author_facet Liu, Wei Wei
Zhang, Chu Yi
Li, Jian Yin
Zhang, Ming Fang
Guo, Zhu Ming
author_sort Liu, Wei Wei
collection PubMed
description Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects. A retrospective cohort study was performed. A two-dimensional classification system based on coronal computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging was developed and validated by 145 cases with oral defects. Oral defects could be classified into 6 types (I–VI) horizontally and 2 classes (a and b) vertically. The proportion of the various types was as follows: Type I, 35.9%; type II, 21.4%; type III, 23.4%; type IV, 4.8%; type V, 2.1%; and type VI, 12.4%. Among them, 91 cases (62.8%) were class a and 54 cases (37.2%) were class b. Type Ia-Va represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving superficial oral defects without mandibular continuity destruction (88 cases, 60.7%). Type Ib-Vb (+M) represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving deep oral defects with segmental mandibular continuity destruction (38 cases, 26.2%). Type I–V (+S) represented the unilateral through and through oral defects with cheek skin involvement (10 cases, 6.9%). Type VI represented bilateral oral defects (18 cases, 12.4%). The present classification system for the evaluation of the oral defects was simple and practical, and could identify the common types of oral defects and guide the reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5754834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57548342018-01-17 A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery Liu, Wei Wei Zhang, Chu Yi Li, Jian Yin Zhang, Ming Fang Guo, Zhu Ming Oncol Lett Articles Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects. A retrospective cohort study was performed. A two-dimensional classification system based on coronal computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging was developed and validated by 145 cases with oral defects. Oral defects could be classified into 6 types (I–VI) horizontally and 2 classes (a and b) vertically. The proportion of the various types was as follows: Type I, 35.9%; type II, 21.4%; type III, 23.4%; type IV, 4.8%; type V, 2.1%; and type VI, 12.4%. Among them, 91 cases (62.8%) were class a and 54 cases (37.2%) were class b. Type Ia-Va represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving superficial oral defects without mandibular continuity destruction (88 cases, 60.7%). Type Ib-Vb (+M) represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving deep oral defects with segmental mandibular continuity destruction (38 cases, 26.2%). Type I–V (+S) represented the unilateral through and through oral defects with cheek skin involvement (10 cases, 6.9%). Type VI represented bilateral oral defects (18 cases, 12.4%). The present classification system for the evaluation of the oral defects was simple and practical, and could identify the common types of oral defects and guide the reconstruction. D.A. Spandidos 2017-12 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5754834/ /pubmed/29344134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139 Text en Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Liu, Wei Wei
Zhang, Chu Yi
Li, Jian Yin
Zhang, Ming Fang
Guo, Zhu Ming
A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title_full A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title_fullStr A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title_full_unstemmed A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title_short A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
title_sort novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139
work_keys_str_mv AT liuweiwei anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT zhangchuyi anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT lijianyin anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT zhangmingfang anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT guozhuming anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT liuweiwei novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT zhangchuyi novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT lijianyin novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT zhangmingfang novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery
AT guozhuming novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery