Cargando…
A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery
Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139 |
_version_ | 1783290489657622528 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Wei Wei Zhang, Chu Yi Li, Jian Yin Zhang, Ming Fang Guo, Zhu Ming |
author_facet | Liu, Wei Wei Zhang, Chu Yi Li, Jian Yin Zhang, Ming Fang Guo, Zhu Ming |
author_sort | Liu, Wei Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects. A retrospective cohort study was performed. A two-dimensional classification system based on coronal computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging was developed and validated by 145 cases with oral defects. Oral defects could be classified into 6 types (I–VI) horizontally and 2 classes (a and b) vertically. The proportion of the various types was as follows: Type I, 35.9%; type II, 21.4%; type III, 23.4%; type IV, 4.8%; type V, 2.1%; and type VI, 12.4%. Among them, 91 cases (62.8%) were class a and 54 cases (37.2%) were class b. Type Ia-Va represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving superficial oral defects without mandibular continuity destruction (88 cases, 60.7%). Type Ib-Vb (+M) represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving deep oral defects with segmental mandibular continuity destruction (38 cases, 26.2%). Type I–V (+S) represented the unilateral through and through oral defects with cheek skin involvement (10 cases, 6.9%). Type VI represented bilateral oral defects (18 cases, 12.4%). The present classification system for the evaluation of the oral defects was simple and practical, and could identify the common types of oral defects and guide the reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5754834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57548342018-01-17 A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery Liu, Wei Wei Zhang, Chu Yi Li, Jian Yin Zhang, Ming Fang Guo, Zhu Ming Oncol Lett Articles Accurate evaluation of oral tissue defects following oncological surgery is necessary for the subsequent reconstruction. However, there is currently no effective classification system for oral defects in the clinical setting. The present study therefore developed a clinical classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects. A retrospective cohort study was performed. A two-dimensional classification system based on coronal computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging was developed and validated by 145 cases with oral defects. Oral defects could be classified into 6 types (I–VI) horizontally and 2 classes (a and b) vertically. The proportion of the various types was as follows: Type I, 35.9%; type II, 21.4%; type III, 23.4%; type IV, 4.8%; type V, 2.1%; and type VI, 12.4%. Among them, 91 cases (62.8%) were class a and 54 cases (37.2%) were class b. Type Ia-Va represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving superficial oral defects without mandibular continuity destruction (88 cases, 60.7%). Type Ib-Vb (+M) represented the unilateral 1–5 subsites involving deep oral defects with segmental mandibular continuity destruction (38 cases, 26.2%). Type I–V (+S) represented the unilateral through and through oral defects with cheek skin involvement (10 cases, 6.9%). Type VI represented bilateral oral defects (18 cases, 12.4%). The present classification system for the evaluation of the oral defects was simple and practical, and could identify the common types of oral defects and guide the reconstruction. D.A. Spandidos 2017-12 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5754834/ /pubmed/29344134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139 Text en Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Liu, Wei Wei Zhang, Chu Yi Li, Jian Yin Zhang, Ming Fang Guo, Zhu Ming A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title | A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title_full | A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title_fullStr | A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title_short | A novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
title_sort | novel classification system for the evaluation and reconstruction of oral defects following oncological surgery |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuweiwei anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT zhangchuyi anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT lijianyin anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT zhangmingfang anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT guozhuming anovelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT liuweiwei novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT zhangchuyi novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT lijianyin novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT zhangmingfang novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery AT guozhuming novelclassificationsystemfortheevaluationandreconstructionoforaldefectsfollowingoncologicalsurgery |