Cargando…

Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact on surviv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strandberg Holka, Peter, Eriksson, Sam, Eberhard, Jakob, Bergenfeldt, Magnus, Lindell, Gert, Sturesson, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1
_version_ 1783290563178528768
author Strandberg Holka, Peter
Eriksson, Sam
Eberhard, Jakob
Bergenfeldt, Magnus
Lindell, Gert
Sturesson, Christian
author_facet Strandberg Holka, Peter
Eriksson, Sam
Eberhard, Jakob
Bergenfeldt, Magnus
Lindell, Gert
Sturesson, Christian
author_sort Strandberg Holka, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact on survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 in a single center were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were included, out of whom 74 patients (26%) presented with a postoperative PS WHO > 2 precluding administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002) and shorter overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with PS > 2 after surgery had higher preoperative ASA score, had a higher frequency of major complications after surgery, and had more frequently synchronous liver and lung metastases. PS was found to be the strongest independent factor predicting survival (hazard ratio 0.45). When patients with postoperative PS > 2 developed recurrent disease (54 of 74), 43 (80%) received tumor specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with postoperative PS > 2 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had decreased recurrence-free and overall survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. After recurrence, a large majority of these patients had had improvement in PS allowing for administration of tumor specific treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5755260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57552602018-01-08 Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases Strandberg Holka, Peter Eriksson, Sam Eberhard, Jakob Bergenfeldt, Magnus Lindell, Gert Sturesson, Christian World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) is known as one of the strongest prognostic factors for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze factors associated with poor PS assessed after resection for colorectal liver metastases and the impact on survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 in a single center were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were included, out of whom 74 patients (26%) presented with a postoperative PS WHO > 2 precluding administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients had a shorter recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002) and shorter overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that patients with PS > 2 after surgery had higher preoperative ASA score, had a higher frequency of major complications after surgery, and had more frequently synchronous liver and lung metastases. PS was found to be the strongest independent factor predicting survival (hazard ratio 0.45). When patients with postoperative PS > 2 developed recurrent disease (54 of 74), 43 (80%) received tumor specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with postoperative PS > 2 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had decreased recurrence-free and overall survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. After recurrence, a large majority of these patients had had improvement in PS allowing for administration of tumor specific treatment. BioMed Central 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5755260/ /pubmed/29304822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Strandberg Holka, Peter
Eriksson, Sam
Eberhard, Jakob
Bergenfeldt, Magnus
Lindell, Gert
Sturesson, Christian
Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_short Significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_sort significance of poor performance status after resection of colorectal liver metastases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1306-1
work_keys_str_mv AT strandbergholkapeter significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT erikssonsam significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT eberhardjakob significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT bergenfeldtmagnus significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT lindellgert significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT sturessonchristian significanceofpoorperformancestatusafterresectionofcolorectallivermetastases