Cargando…

Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum

BACKGROUND: Antibody responses to sand fly saliva have been suggested to be a useful marker of exposure to sand fly bites and Leishmania infection and a potential tool to monitor the effectiveness of entomological interventions. Exposure to sand fly bites before infection has also been suggested to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinnell, Rupert J., Soremekun, Seyi, Bates, Paul A., Rogers, Matthew E., Garcez, Lourdes M., Courtenay, Orin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2587-5
_version_ 1783290569985884160
author Quinnell, Rupert J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Bates, Paul A.
Rogers, Matthew E.
Garcez, Lourdes M.
Courtenay, Orin
author_facet Quinnell, Rupert J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Bates, Paul A.
Rogers, Matthew E.
Garcez, Lourdes M.
Courtenay, Orin
author_sort Quinnell, Rupert J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibody responses to sand fly saliva have been suggested to be a useful marker of exposure to sand fly bites and Leishmania infection and a potential tool to monitor the effectiveness of entomological interventions. Exposure to sand fly bites before infection has also been suggested to modulate the severity of the infection. Here, we test these hypotheses by quantifying the anti-saliva IgG response in a cohort study of dogs exposed to natural infection with Leishmania infantum in Brazil. METHODS: IgG responses to crude salivary antigens of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis were measured by ELISA in longitudinal serum samples from 47 previously unexposed sentinel dogs and 11 initially uninfected resident dogs for up to 2 years. Antibody responses were compared to the intensity of transmission, assessed by variation in the incidence of infection between seasons and between dogs. Antibody responses before patent infection were then compared with the severity of infection, assessed using tissue parasite loads and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Previously unexposed dogs acquired anti-saliva antibody responses within 2 months, and the rate of acquisition increased with the intensity of seasonal transmission. Over the following 2 years, antibody responses varied with seasonal transmission and sand fly numbers, declining rapidly in periods of low transmission. Antibody responses varied greatly between dogs and correlated with the intensity of transmission experienced by individual dogs, measured by the number of days in the field before patent infection. After infection, anti-saliva antibody responses were positively correlated with anti-parasite antibody responses. However, there was no evidence that the degree of exposure to sand fly bites before infection affected the severity of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-saliva antibody responses are a marker of current transmission intensity in dogs exposed to natural infection with Leishmania infantum, but are not associated with the outcome of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5755305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57553052018-01-08 Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum Quinnell, Rupert J. Soremekun, Seyi Bates, Paul A. Rogers, Matthew E. Garcez, Lourdes M. Courtenay, Orin Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Antibody responses to sand fly saliva have been suggested to be a useful marker of exposure to sand fly bites and Leishmania infection and a potential tool to monitor the effectiveness of entomological interventions. Exposure to sand fly bites before infection has also been suggested to modulate the severity of the infection. Here, we test these hypotheses by quantifying the anti-saliva IgG response in a cohort study of dogs exposed to natural infection with Leishmania infantum in Brazil. METHODS: IgG responses to crude salivary antigens of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis were measured by ELISA in longitudinal serum samples from 47 previously unexposed sentinel dogs and 11 initially uninfected resident dogs for up to 2 years. Antibody responses were compared to the intensity of transmission, assessed by variation in the incidence of infection between seasons and between dogs. Antibody responses before patent infection were then compared with the severity of infection, assessed using tissue parasite loads and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Previously unexposed dogs acquired anti-saliva antibody responses within 2 months, and the rate of acquisition increased with the intensity of seasonal transmission. Over the following 2 years, antibody responses varied with seasonal transmission and sand fly numbers, declining rapidly in periods of low transmission. Antibody responses varied greatly between dogs and correlated with the intensity of transmission experienced by individual dogs, measured by the number of days in the field before patent infection. After infection, anti-saliva antibody responses were positively correlated with anti-parasite antibody responses. However, there was no evidence that the degree of exposure to sand fly bites before infection affected the severity of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-saliva antibody responses are a marker of current transmission intensity in dogs exposed to natural infection with Leishmania infantum, but are not associated with the outcome of infection. BioMed Central 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5755305/ /pubmed/29301571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2587-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Quinnell, Rupert J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Bates, Paul A.
Rogers, Matthew E.
Garcez, Lourdes M.
Courtenay, Orin
Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title_full Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title_fullStr Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title_full_unstemmed Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title_short Antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum
title_sort antibody response to sand fly saliva is a marker of transmission intensity but not disease progression in dogs naturally infected with leishmania infantum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2587-5
work_keys_str_mv AT quinnellrupertj antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum
AT soremekunseyi antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum
AT batespaula antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum
AT rogersmatthewe antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum
AT garcezlourdesm antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum
AT courtenayorin antibodyresponsetosandflysalivaisamarkeroftransmissionintensitybutnotdiseaseprogressionindogsnaturallyinfectedwithleishmaniainfantum