Cargando…

Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?

BACKGROUND: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) has been reported as a sensitive prognostic marker for gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the GPS is equally applicable to patients with early-stage and advanced-stage gastric cancers. METHODS: Patients (n = 544) who underwent elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakahara, Tomoyuki, Ueno, Nozomi, Maeda, Tetsuo, Kanemitsu, Kiyonori, Yoshikawa, Takuro, Tsuchida, Shinobu, Toyokawa, Akihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317944
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr943w
_version_ 1783290609748934656
author Wakahara, Tomoyuki
Ueno, Nozomi
Maeda, Tetsuo
Kanemitsu, Kiyonori
Yoshikawa, Takuro
Tsuchida, Shinobu
Toyokawa, Akihiro
author_facet Wakahara, Tomoyuki
Ueno, Nozomi
Maeda, Tetsuo
Kanemitsu, Kiyonori
Yoshikawa, Takuro
Tsuchida, Shinobu
Toyokawa, Akihiro
author_sort Wakahara, Tomoyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) has been reported as a sensitive prognostic marker for gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the GPS is equally applicable to patients with early-stage and advanced-stage gastric cancers. METHODS: Patients (n = 544) who underwent elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. GPSs of 2, 1, and 0 were allocated to patients with both an elevated C-reactive protein level (> 1.0 mg/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 mg/dL), patients with only one of these abnormalities, and patients with neither abnormality, respectively. The prognostic factors relevant to patients with early-stage (pStage I, n = 304) and advanced-stage (pStage II, III, and IV, n = 240) gastric cancer were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In the early-stage group, only the serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (P = 0.037) was a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis; the GPS was not significant (P = 0.095). In the advanced-stage group, an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3 or 4 (P = 0.032), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.043) and CA19-9 (P = 0.045) levels, a GPS 1 - 2 (P = 0.017), and type 4 tumor (P = 0.020) correlated significantly with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: GPS is a simple and useful prognostic score for patients with advanced-stage, but is not applicable to early-stage patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5755638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57556382018-01-09 Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers? Wakahara, Tomoyuki Ueno, Nozomi Maeda, Tetsuo Kanemitsu, Kiyonori Yoshikawa, Takuro Tsuchida, Shinobu Toyokawa, Akihiro Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) has been reported as a sensitive prognostic marker for gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the GPS is equally applicable to patients with early-stage and advanced-stage gastric cancers. METHODS: Patients (n = 544) who underwent elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. GPSs of 2, 1, and 0 were allocated to patients with both an elevated C-reactive protein level (> 1.0 mg/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 mg/dL), patients with only one of these abnormalities, and patients with neither abnormality, respectively. The prognostic factors relevant to patients with early-stage (pStage I, n = 304) and advanced-stage (pStage II, III, and IV, n = 240) gastric cancer were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In the early-stage group, only the serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (P = 0.037) was a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis; the GPS was not significant (P = 0.095). In the advanced-stage group, an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3 or 4 (P = 0.032), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = 0.043) and CA19-9 (P = 0.045) levels, a GPS 1 - 2 (P = 0.017), and type 4 tumor (P = 0.020) correlated significantly with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: GPS is a simple and useful prognostic score for patients with advanced-stage, but is not applicable to early-stage patients. Elmer Press 2017-12 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5755638/ /pubmed/29317944 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr943w Text en Copyright 2017, Wakahara et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wakahara, Tomoyuki
Ueno, Nozomi
Maeda, Tetsuo
Kanemitsu, Kiyonori
Yoshikawa, Takuro
Tsuchida, Shinobu
Toyokawa, Akihiro
Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title_full Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title_fullStr Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title_short Is the Glasgow Prognostic Score Applicable to Both Early- and Advanced-Stage Gastric Cancers?
title_sort is the glasgow prognostic score applicable to both early- and advanced-stage gastric cancers?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29317944
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr943w
work_keys_str_mv AT wakaharatomoyuki istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT uenonozomi istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT maedatetsuo istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT kanemitsukiyonori istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT yoshikawatakuro istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT tsuchidashinobu istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers
AT toyokawaakihiro istheglasgowprognosticscoreapplicabletobothearlyandadvancedstagegastriccancers