Cargando…

A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases

BACKGROUND: Workers’ compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze a database of geriatric workers’ compensation patients after surgical repair of the rotator cuff and identify both medical and nonmedical patient fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Edward, Thirukumaran, Caroline, Noyes, Katia, Voloshin, Ilya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458517732209
_version_ 1783290643675611136
author Shields, Edward
Thirukumaran, Caroline
Noyes, Katia
Voloshin, Ilya
author_facet Shields, Edward
Thirukumaran, Caroline
Noyes, Katia
Voloshin, Ilya
author_sort Shields, Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workers’ compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze a database of geriatric workers’ compensation patients after surgical repair of the rotator cuff and identify both medical and nonmedical patient factors that influence the time it takes for them to return to work at full duty, including a comparison of arthroscopic and open techniques. METHODS: An all workers’ compensation database was queried for rotator cuff claims that were surgically managed using arthroscopic, open, or both approaches from 2003 to 2013 in patients aged ≥60. Primary outcomes were the number of days for return to full work (RTW) following surgery and the total reimbursement for health care. Multivariate analysis was performed, and data are presented as average ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The database yielded 1903 claims for surgically treated rotator cuff conditions (arthroscopic n = 935; open n = 926; both n = 42). In multivariate RTW analyses, we did not find a significant difference between groups (RTW in days was 153 ± 134 for arthroscopy [P = .81], 160 ± 160 for open [Ref], and 140 ± 82 days for both [P = .75]). However, multivariate analysis of reimbursement claims found arthroscopic surgery claims to be 13% higher compared to claims for open surgery only (US $29 986 ± 16 259 for arthroscopy vs US $26 495 ± 13 186 for open, P < .001). Patients aged ≥65 had more medical expenses than patients aged 60 to 64 (P = .03). Potentially modifiable variables that significantly prolonged RTW timing and higher health-care claims included need for vocational rehabilitation services and filing of a legal suit. CONCLUSIONS: Return to full-duty work in geriatric workers’ compensation patients after rotator cuff repair takes about 5 months regardless of surgical approach and costs significantly more in patients aged ≥65. Arthroscopic repairs generated 13% more cumulative health-care costs than open surgery alone. More efficient vocational rehabilitation services and minimizing legal suits may help get patients back to work sooner and reduce overall costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5755839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57558392018-12-01 A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases Shields, Edward Thirukumaran, Caroline Noyes, Katia Voloshin, Ilya Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Articles BACKGROUND: Workers’ compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze a database of geriatric workers’ compensation patients after surgical repair of the rotator cuff and identify both medical and nonmedical patient factors that influence the time it takes for them to return to work at full duty, including a comparison of arthroscopic and open techniques. METHODS: An all workers’ compensation database was queried for rotator cuff claims that were surgically managed using arthroscopic, open, or both approaches from 2003 to 2013 in patients aged ≥60. Primary outcomes were the number of days for return to full work (RTW) following surgery and the total reimbursement for health care. Multivariate analysis was performed, and data are presented as average ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The database yielded 1903 claims for surgically treated rotator cuff conditions (arthroscopic n = 935; open n = 926; both n = 42). In multivariate RTW analyses, we did not find a significant difference between groups (RTW in days was 153 ± 134 for arthroscopy [P = .81], 160 ± 160 for open [Ref], and 140 ± 82 days for both [P = .75]). However, multivariate analysis of reimbursement claims found arthroscopic surgery claims to be 13% higher compared to claims for open surgery only (US $29 986 ± 16 259 for arthroscopy vs US $26 495 ± 13 186 for open, P < .001). Patients aged ≥65 had more medical expenses than patients aged 60 to 64 (P = .03). Potentially modifiable variables that significantly prolonged RTW timing and higher health-care claims included need for vocational rehabilitation services and filing of a legal suit. CONCLUSIONS: Return to full-duty work in geriatric workers’ compensation patients after rotator cuff repair takes about 5 months regardless of surgical approach and costs significantly more in patients aged ≥65. Arthroscopic repairs generated 13% more cumulative health-care costs than open surgery alone. More efficient vocational rehabilitation services and minimizing legal suits may help get patients back to work sooner and reduce overall costs. SAGE Publications 2017-10-25 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5755839/ /pubmed/29318082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458517732209 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Shields, Edward
Thirukumaran, Caroline
Noyes, Katia
Voloshin, Ilya
A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title_full A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title_fullStr A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title_full_unstemmed A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title_short A Review of a Workers’ Compensation Database 2003 to 2013: Patient Factors Influencing Return to Work and Cumulative Financial Claims After Rotator Cuff Repair in Geriatric Workers’ Compensation Cases
title_sort review of a workers’ compensation database 2003 to 2013: patient factors influencing return to work and cumulative financial claims after rotator cuff repair in geriatric workers’ compensation cases
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458517732209
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldsedward areviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT thirukumarancaroline areviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT noyeskatia areviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT voloshinilya areviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT shieldsedward reviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT thirukumarancaroline reviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT noyeskatia reviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases
AT voloshinilya reviewofaworkerscompensationdatabase2003to2013patientfactorsinfluencingreturntoworkandcumulativefinancialclaimsafterrotatorcuffrepairingeriatricworkerscompensationcases