Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric equivalence of magnetic resonance (MR)-generated synthetic CT (synCT) and simulation CT for treatment planning in radiotherapy of rectal cancer. METHODS: This study was conducted on eleven patients who underwent whole-body PET/MR and PE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hesheng, Du, Kevin, Qu, Juliet, Chandarana, Hersh, Das, Indra J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190883
_version_ 1783290658398666752
author Wang, Hesheng
Du, Kevin
Qu, Juliet
Chandarana, Hersh
Das, Indra J.
author_facet Wang, Hesheng
Du, Kevin
Qu, Juliet
Chandarana, Hersh
Das, Indra J.
author_sort Wang, Hesheng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric equivalence of magnetic resonance (MR)-generated synthetic CT (synCT) and simulation CT for treatment planning in radiotherapy of rectal cancer. METHODS: This study was conducted on eleven patients who underwent whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT examination in a prospective IRB-approved study. For each patient synCT was generated from Dixon MR using a model-based method. Standard treatment planning directives were used to create a four-field box (4F), an oblique four-field (O4F) and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan on synCT for treatment of rectal cancer. The plans were recalculated on CT with the same monitor units (MUs) as that of synCT. Dose-volume metrics of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) as well as gamma analysis of dose distributions were evaluated to quantify the difference between synCT and CT plans. All plans were calculated using the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA). The VMAT plans on synCT and CT were also calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm for comparison with the AAA calculation. RESULTS: Medians of absolute differences in PTV metrics between synCT and CT plans were 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.3% for 4F, O4F and VMAT respectively. No significant differences were observed in OAR dose metrics including bladder V40Gy, mean dose in bladder, bowel V45Gy and femoral head V30Gy in any techniques. Gamma analysis with 2%/2mm dose difference/distance to agreement criteria showed median passing rates of 99.8% (range: 98.5 to 100%), 99.9% (97.2 to 100%), and 99.9% (99.4 to 100%) for 4F, O4F and VMAT, respectively. Using Acuros XB dose calculation, 2%/2mm gamma analysis generated a passing rate of 99.2% (97.7 to 99.9%) for VMAT plans. CONCLUSION: SynCT enabled dose calculation equivalent to conventional CT for treatment planning of 3D conformal treatment as well as VMAT of rectal cancer. The dosimetric agreement between synCT and CT calculated doses demonstrated the potential of MR-only treatment planning for rectal cancer using MR generated synCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5755922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57559222018-01-26 Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer Wang, Hesheng Du, Kevin Qu, Juliet Chandarana, Hersh Das, Indra J. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric equivalence of magnetic resonance (MR)-generated synthetic CT (synCT) and simulation CT for treatment planning in radiotherapy of rectal cancer. METHODS: This study was conducted on eleven patients who underwent whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT examination in a prospective IRB-approved study. For each patient synCT was generated from Dixon MR using a model-based method. Standard treatment planning directives were used to create a four-field box (4F), an oblique four-field (O4F) and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan on synCT for treatment of rectal cancer. The plans were recalculated on CT with the same monitor units (MUs) as that of synCT. Dose-volume metrics of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) as well as gamma analysis of dose distributions were evaluated to quantify the difference between synCT and CT plans. All plans were calculated using the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA). The VMAT plans on synCT and CT were also calculated using the Acuros XB algorithm for comparison with the AAA calculation. RESULTS: Medians of absolute differences in PTV metrics between synCT and CT plans were 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.3% for 4F, O4F and VMAT respectively. No significant differences were observed in OAR dose metrics including bladder V40Gy, mean dose in bladder, bowel V45Gy and femoral head V30Gy in any techniques. Gamma analysis with 2%/2mm dose difference/distance to agreement criteria showed median passing rates of 99.8% (range: 98.5 to 100%), 99.9% (97.2 to 100%), and 99.9% (99.4 to 100%) for 4F, O4F and VMAT, respectively. Using Acuros XB dose calculation, 2%/2mm gamma analysis generated a passing rate of 99.2% (97.7 to 99.9%) for VMAT plans. CONCLUSION: SynCT enabled dose calculation equivalent to conventional CT for treatment planning of 3D conformal treatment as well as VMAT of rectal cancer. The dosimetric agreement between synCT and CT calculated doses demonstrated the potential of MR-only treatment planning for rectal cancer using MR generated synCT. Public Library of Science 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5755922/ /pubmed/29304105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190883 Text en © 2018 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Hesheng
Du, Kevin
Qu, Juliet
Chandarana, Hersh
Das, Indra J.
Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic ct for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5755922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190883
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghesheng dosimetricevaluationofmagneticresonancegeneratedsyntheticctforradiationtreatmentofrectalcancer
AT dukevin dosimetricevaluationofmagneticresonancegeneratedsyntheticctforradiationtreatmentofrectalcancer
AT qujuliet dosimetricevaluationofmagneticresonancegeneratedsyntheticctforradiationtreatmentofrectalcancer
AT chandaranahersh dosimetricevaluationofmagneticresonancegeneratedsyntheticctforradiationtreatmentofrectalcancer
AT dasindraj dosimetricevaluationofmagneticresonancegeneratedsyntheticctforradiationtreatmentofrectalcancer