Cargando…

Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koitsalu, Marie, Eklund, Martin, Adolfsson, Jan, Grönberg, Henrik, Brandberg, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5
_version_ 1783290707281182720
author Koitsalu, Marie
Eklund, Martin
Adolfsson, Jan
Grönberg, Henrik
Brandberg, Yvonne
author_facet Koitsalu, Marie
Eklund, Martin
Adolfsson, Jan
Grönberg, Henrik
Brandberg, Yvonne
author_sort Koitsalu, Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on participation rate and to investigate whether some factors contributed to participants doing both the questionnaire and blood sampling as oppose to only one part. METHODS: Our study was embedded within the pilot testing of a large population-based study about prostate cancer screening. Our study sample consisted of 28.134 men between 50 and 69 years of age and living in the region of Stockholm (Sweden) invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire and to provide blood for prostate cancer testing. The men were randomly allocated according to birth of date to receive either: (a) a pre-notification postcard or not; (b) a shorter or a longer invitation letter; (c) a shorter or a longer web-based questionnaire, and (d) a reminder or not. The effects of the survey design factors were tested using chi-square. RESULTS: The use of a pre-notification (p < 0.0001), a longer questionnaire (p = 0.004) and the use of a reminder (p = 0.02) were associated with an increase in overall participation, i.e. responding to the questionnaire or providing blood for PCT or performing both components. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study justified the use of a pre-notification and a reminder in the following large population based study since the benefits of increased participation traded off against the greater costs incurred. Furthermore, we were able to use the longer version of the questionnaire, which allowed us to collect more information without risking a lower response rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57563352018-01-08 Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial Koitsalu, Marie Eklund, Martin Adolfsson, Jan Grönberg, Henrik Brandberg, Yvonne BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on participation rate and to investigate whether some factors contributed to participants doing both the questionnaire and blood sampling as oppose to only one part. METHODS: Our study was embedded within the pilot testing of a large population-based study about prostate cancer screening. Our study sample consisted of 28.134 men between 50 and 69 years of age and living in the region of Stockholm (Sweden) invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire and to provide blood for prostate cancer testing. The men were randomly allocated according to birth of date to receive either: (a) a pre-notification postcard or not; (b) a shorter or a longer invitation letter; (c) a shorter or a longer web-based questionnaire, and (d) a reminder or not. The effects of the survey design factors were tested using chi-square. RESULTS: The use of a pre-notification (p < 0.0001), a longer questionnaire (p = 0.004) and the use of a reminder (p = 0.02) were associated with an increase in overall participation, i.e. responding to the questionnaire or providing blood for PCT or performing both components. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study justified the use of a pre-notification and a reminder in the following large population based study since the benefits of increased participation traded off against the greater costs incurred. Furthermore, we were able to use the longer version of the questionnaire, which allowed us to collect more information without risking a lower response rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5756335/ /pubmed/29304734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koitsalu, Marie
Eklund, Martin
Adolfsson, Jan
Grönberg, Henrik
Brandberg, Yvonne
Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_full Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_short Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_sort effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5
work_keys_str_mv AT koitsalumarie effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eklundmartin effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adolfssonjan effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gronberghenrik effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brandbergyvonne effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial