Cargando…
Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on partici...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5 |
_version_ | 1783290707281182720 |
---|---|
author | Koitsalu, Marie Eklund, Martin Adolfsson, Jan Grönberg, Henrik Brandberg, Yvonne |
author_facet | Koitsalu, Marie Eklund, Martin Adolfsson, Jan Grönberg, Henrik Brandberg, Yvonne |
author_sort | Koitsalu, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on participation rate and to investigate whether some factors contributed to participants doing both the questionnaire and blood sampling as oppose to only one part. METHODS: Our study was embedded within the pilot testing of a large population-based study about prostate cancer screening. Our study sample consisted of 28.134 men between 50 and 69 years of age and living in the region of Stockholm (Sweden) invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire and to provide blood for prostate cancer testing. The men were randomly allocated according to birth of date to receive either: (a) a pre-notification postcard or not; (b) a shorter or a longer invitation letter; (c) a shorter or a longer web-based questionnaire, and (d) a reminder or not. The effects of the survey design factors were tested using chi-square. RESULTS: The use of a pre-notification (p < 0.0001), a longer questionnaire (p = 0.004) and the use of a reminder (p = 0.02) were associated with an increase in overall participation, i.e. responding to the questionnaire or providing blood for PCT or performing both components. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study justified the use of a pre-notification and a reminder in the following large population based study since the benefits of increased participation traded off against the greater costs incurred. Furthermore, we were able to use the longer version of the questionnaire, which allowed us to collect more information without risking a lower response rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5756335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57563352018-01-08 Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial Koitsalu, Marie Eklund, Martin Adolfsson, Jan Grönberg, Henrik Brandberg, Yvonne BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Improving participation rates in epidemiologic studies using questionnaires and biological sampling is important for the generalizability of the outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length, and reminder on participation rate and to investigate whether some factors contributed to participants doing both the questionnaire and blood sampling as oppose to only one part. METHODS: Our study was embedded within the pilot testing of a large population-based study about prostate cancer screening. Our study sample consisted of 28.134 men between 50 and 69 years of age and living in the region of Stockholm (Sweden) invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire and to provide blood for prostate cancer testing. The men were randomly allocated according to birth of date to receive either: (a) a pre-notification postcard or not; (b) a shorter or a longer invitation letter; (c) a shorter or a longer web-based questionnaire, and (d) a reminder or not. The effects of the survey design factors were tested using chi-square. RESULTS: The use of a pre-notification (p < 0.0001), a longer questionnaire (p = 0.004) and the use of a reminder (p = 0.02) were associated with an increase in overall participation, i.e. responding to the questionnaire or providing blood for PCT or performing both components. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study justified the use of a pre-notification and a reminder in the following large population based study since the benefits of increased participation traded off against the greater costs incurred. Furthermore, we were able to use the longer version of the questionnaire, which allowed us to collect more information without risking a lower response rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5756335/ /pubmed/29304734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Koitsalu, Marie Eklund, Martin Adolfsson, Jan Grönberg, Henrik Brandberg, Yvonne Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title | Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0467-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koitsalumarie effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT eklundmartin effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT adolfssonjan effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gronberghenrik effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brandbergyvonne effectsofprenotificationinvitationlengthquestionnairelengthandreminderonparticipationrateaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial |