Cargando…
A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Since Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI - Misodel ®) was approved for labor induction in Europe in 2013, to date, no study has been published comparing MVI to Misoprostol vaginal tablets (MVT). The aim of this study, performed as part of a quality improvement project, was to compare the ef...
Autores principales: | Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, Sørbye, Ingvil Krarup, Gaudernack, Lise C., Lukasse, Mirjam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1647-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)