Cargando…

Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Frail older adults are increasingly expected to self-manage their health and healthcare. We assessed the extent to which this group is able to take up this responsibility by measuring their level of activation as patients (i.e. their knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overbeek, Anouk, Rietjens, Judith A. C., Jabbarian, Lea J., Severijnen, Johan, Swart, Siebe J., van der Heide, Agnes, Korfage, Ida J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0696-9
_version_ 1783290719722536960
author Overbeek, Anouk
Rietjens, Judith A. C.
Jabbarian, Lea J.
Severijnen, Johan
Swart, Siebe J.
van der Heide, Agnes
Korfage, Ida J.
author_facet Overbeek, Anouk
Rietjens, Judith A. C.
Jabbarian, Lea J.
Severijnen, Johan
Swart, Siebe J.
van der Heide, Agnes
Korfage, Ida J.
author_sort Overbeek, Anouk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frail older adults are increasingly expected to self-manage their health and healthcare. We assessed the extent to which this group is able to take up this responsibility by measuring their level of activation as patients (i.e. their knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health and healthcare). Further, we studied which characteristics of older adults were associated with patient activation. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study 200 frail, competent adults (median age 87 years) participated. Participants were community-dwelling adults who received home care and residents of care homes. Data were collected via personal interviews in participants’ homes. The main outcome measure was patient activation assessed by the short version of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13; range: 0–100). The PAM distinguishes four levels of increasing activation with level 1 indicating poor patient activation and level 4 adequate patient activation. Other studied variables were: multimorbidity, type of residency, frailty (Tilburg Frailty Index), mental competence (Mini Mental State Examination), health-related quality of life (SF-12), satisfaction with healthcare (subscale Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire) and personal characteristics (age, gender, marital status, educational level). Regression analyses were performed to investigate which variables were associated with patient activation. RESULTS: Participants had a median PAM score of 51. Thirty-nine percent had level 1 activation, 31% level 2, 26% level 3 and 5% level 4. Fifty-nine percent of community dwelling adults had level 1 or 2 activation versus 81% of care home residents (p = 0.007). Mental competence (Effect: 0.52, CI: 0.03–1.01, p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life (Effect: 0.15, CI: 0.01–0.30, p = 0.04 for physical health; Effect: 0.20, CI: 0.07–0.34, p = 0.003 for mental health) were positively associated with patient activation. Frailty (Effect: -1.06, CI: -1.75 – -0.36, p = 0.003) was negatively associated with patient activation. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of this frail and very old study population, especially those with a lower health-related quality of life, may be unable to self-manage their health and healthcare to the level expected from them. The increasing population of frail older adults may need help in managing their health and healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57563882018-01-09 Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study Overbeek, Anouk Rietjens, Judith A. C. Jabbarian, Lea J. Severijnen, Johan Swart, Siebe J. van der Heide, Agnes Korfage, Ida J. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Frail older adults are increasingly expected to self-manage their health and healthcare. We assessed the extent to which this group is able to take up this responsibility by measuring their level of activation as patients (i.e. their knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health and healthcare). Further, we studied which characteristics of older adults were associated with patient activation. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study 200 frail, competent adults (median age 87 years) participated. Participants were community-dwelling adults who received home care and residents of care homes. Data were collected via personal interviews in participants’ homes. The main outcome measure was patient activation assessed by the short version of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13; range: 0–100). The PAM distinguishes four levels of increasing activation with level 1 indicating poor patient activation and level 4 adequate patient activation. Other studied variables were: multimorbidity, type of residency, frailty (Tilburg Frailty Index), mental competence (Mini Mental State Examination), health-related quality of life (SF-12), satisfaction with healthcare (subscale Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire) and personal characteristics (age, gender, marital status, educational level). Regression analyses were performed to investigate which variables were associated with patient activation. RESULTS: Participants had a median PAM score of 51. Thirty-nine percent had level 1 activation, 31% level 2, 26% level 3 and 5% level 4. Fifty-nine percent of community dwelling adults had level 1 or 2 activation versus 81% of care home residents (p = 0.007). Mental competence (Effect: 0.52, CI: 0.03–1.01, p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life (Effect: 0.15, CI: 0.01–0.30, p = 0.04 for physical health; Effect: 0.20, CI: 0.07–0.34, p = 0.003 for mental health) were positively associated with patient activation. Frailty (Effect: -1.06, CI: -1.75 – -0.36, p = 0.003) was negatively associated with patient activation. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of this frail and very old study population, especially those with a lower health-related quality of life, may be unable to self-manage their health and healthcare to the level expected from them. The increasing population of frail older adults may need help in managing their health and healthcare. BioMed Central 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5756388/ /pubmed/29304752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0696-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Overbeek, Anouk
Rietjens, Judith A. C.
Jabbarian, Lea J.
Severijnen, Johan
Swart, Siebe J.
van der Heide, Agnes
Korfage, Ida J.
Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title_full Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title_short Low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
title_sort low patient activation levels in frail older adults: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0696-9
work_keys_str_mv AT overbeekanouk lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT rietjensjudithac lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT jabbarianleaj lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT severijnenjohan lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT swartsiebej lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT vanderheideagnes lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy
AT korfageidaj lowpatientactivationlevelsinfrailolderadultsacrosssectionalstudy