Cargando…

Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Japanese patients. The aim of this study is to assess changes in HRQOL during 36 months after LRP compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: The sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashine, Katsuyoshi, Kakuda, Toshio, Iuchi, Shunsuke, Hosokawa, Tadanori, Ninomiya, Iku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0835-1
_version_ 1783290724876288000
author Hashine, Katsuyoshi
Kakuda, Toshio
Iuchi, Shunsuke
Hosokawa, Tadanori
Ninomiya, Iku
author_facet Hashine, Katsuyoshi
Kakuda, Toshio
Iuchi, Shunsuke
Hosokawa, Tadanori
Ninomiya, Iku
author_sort Hashine, Katsuyoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Japanese patients. The aim of this study is to assess changes in HRQOL during 36 months after LRP compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: The subjects were 105 consecutive patients treated with LRP between 2011 and 2012. HRQOL was evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Medical Outcome Study 8-Items Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery. These results were compared with data for 107 consecutive patients treated with RRP between 2005 and 2007. The comparison between LRP and RRP was examined at every time point by Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-square test. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent factors related to the urinary domain in EPIC. RESULTS: The IPSS change was similar in both groups. The LRP group had a better SF-8 mental component summary score at baseline and a better SF-8 physical component summary score at 1 month after surgery. In EPIC, urinary function and bother were worse after LRP, but improved at 12 months and did not differ significantly from those after RRP; however, these factors then worsened again at 36 months after LRP. Urinary incontinence was also worse at 36 months after LRP, compared to RRP. In patients treated with nerve-sparing surgery, urinary function and urinary incontinence were similar and good at 12 and 36 months in both groups. Bowel function and bother, and sexual function and bother were similar in both groups and showed no changes from 12 to 36 months. Age and salvage radiotherapy were independent predictors of incontinence (daily use of two or more pads) in multivariate analysis. Surgical procedure was not an independent factor for incontinence, but incontinence defined as use of one pad or more was associated with the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary function and bother at 36 months were worse after LRP than after RRP. Age, salvage radiotherapy and surgical procedure were associated with urinary incontinence after 36 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57564102018-01-09 Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy Hashine, Katsuyoshi Kakuda, Toshio Iuchi, Shunsuke Hosokawa, Tadanori Ninomiya, Iku Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Japanese patients. The aim of this study is to assess changes in HRQOL during 36 months after LRP compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: The subjects were 105 consecutive patients treated with LRP between 2011 and 2012. HRQOL was evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Medical Outcome Study 8-Items Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after surgery. These results were compared with data for 107 consecutive patients treated with RRP between 2005 and 2007. The comparison between LRP and RRP was examined at every time point by Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-square test. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent factors related to the urinary domain in EPIC. RESULTS: The IPSS change was similar in both groups. The LRP group had a better SF-8 mental component summary score at baseline and a better SF-8 physical component summary score at 1 month after surgery. In EPIC, urinary function and bother were worse after LRP, but improved at 12 months and did not differ significantly from those after RRP; however, these factors then worsened again at 36 months after LRP. Urinary incontinence was also worse at 36 months after LRP, compared to RRP. In patients treated with nerve-sparing surgery, urinary function and urinary incontinence were similar and good at 12 and 36 months in both groups. Bowel function and bother, and sexual function and bother were similar in both groups and showed no changes from 12 to 36 months. Age and salvage radiotherapy were independent predictors of incontinence (daily use of two or more pads) in multivariate analysis. Surgical procedure was not an independent factor for incontinence, but incontinence defined as use of one pad or more was associated with the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary function and bother at 36 months were worse after LRP than after RRP. Age, salvage radiotherapy and surgical procedure were associated with urinary incontinence after 36 months. BioMed Central 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5756410/ /pubmed/29304808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0835-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hashine, Katsuyoshi
Kakuda, Toshio
Iuchi, Shunsuke
Hosokawa, Tadanori
Ninomiya, Iku
Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_full Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_short Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_sort prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29304808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0835-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hashinekatsuyoshi prospectivelongitudinaloutcomesofqualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomycomparedwithretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT kakudatoshio prospectivelongitudinaloutcomesofqualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomycomparedwithretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT iuchishunsuke prospectivelongitudinaloutcomesofqualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomycomparedwithretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT hosokawatadanori prospectivelongitudinaloutcomesofqualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomycomparedwithretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT ninomiyaiku prospectivelongitudinaloutcomesofqualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomycomparedwithretropubicradicalprostatectomy