Cargando…

On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model

Von Bertalanffy proposed the differential equation m′(t) = p × m(t)(a) − q × m(t) for the description of the mass growth of animals as a function m(t) of time t. He suggested that the solution using the metabolic scaling exponent a = 2/3 (Von Bertalanffy growth function VBGF) would be universal for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renner-Martin, Katharina, Brunner, Norbert, Kühleitner, Manfred, Nowak, Werner Georg, Scheicher, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312827
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205
_version_ 1783290754405236736
author Renner-Martin, Katharina
Brunner, Norbert
Kühleitner, Manfred
Nowak, Werner Georg
Scheicher, Klaus
author_facet Renner-Martin, Katharina
Brunner, Norbert
Kühleitner, Manfred
Nowak, Werner Georg
Scheicher, Klaus
author_sort Renner-Martin, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Von Bertalanffy proposed the differential equation m′(t) = p × m(t)(a) − q × m(t) for the description of the mass growth of animals as a function m(t) of time t. He suggested that the solution using the metabolic scaling exponent a = 2/3 (Von Bertalanffy growth function VBGF) would be universal for vertebrates. Several authors questioned universality, as for certain species other models would provide a better fit. This paper reconsiders this question. Based on 60 data sets from literature (37 about fish and 23 about non-fish species) it optimizes the model parameters, in particular the exponent 0 ≤ a < 1, so that the model curve achieves the best fit to the data. The main observation of the paper is the large variability in the exponent, which can vary over a very large range without affecting the fit to the data significantly, when the other parameters are also optimized. The paper explains this by differences in the data quality: variability is low for data from highly controlled experiments and high for natural data. Other deficiencies were biologically meaningless optimal parameter values or optimal parameter values attained on the boundary of the parameter region (indicating the possible need for a different model). Only 11 of the 60 data sets were free of such deficiencies and for them no universal exponent could be discerned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57566142018-01-08 On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model Renner-Martin, Katharina Brunner, Norbert Kühleitner, Manfred Nowak, Werner Georg Scheicher, Klaus PeerJ Agricultural Science Von Bertalanffy proposed the differential equation m′(t) = p × m(t)(a) − q × m(t) for the description of the mass growth of animals as a function m(t) of time t. He suggested that the solution using the metabolic scaling exponent a = 2/3 (Von Bertalanffy growth function VBGF) would be universal for vertebrates. Several authors questioned universality, as for certain species other models would provide a better fit. This paper reconsiders this question. Based on 60 data sets from literature (37 about fish and 23 about non-fish species) it optimizes the model parameters, in particular the exponent 0 ≤ a < 1, so that the model curve achieves the best fit to the data. The main observation of the paper is the large variability in the exponent, which can vary over a very large range without affecting the fit to the data significantly, when the other parameters are also optimized. The paper explains this by differences in the data quality: variability is low for data from highly controlled experiments and high for natural data. Other deficiencies were biologically meaningless optimal parameter values or optimal parameter values attained on the boundary of the parameter region (indicating the possible need for a different model). Only 11 of the 60 data sets were free of such deficiencies and for them no universal exponent could be discerned. PeerJ Inc. 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5756614/ /pubmed/29312827 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205 Text en ©2018 Renner-Martin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Renner-Martin, Katharina
Brunner, Norbert
Kühleitner, Manfred
Nowak, Werner Georg
Scheicher, Klaus
On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title_full On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title_fullStr On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title_full_unstemmed On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title_short On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
title_sort on the exponent in the von bertalanffy growth model
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312827
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205
work_keys_str_mv AT rennermartinkatharina ontheexponentinthevonbertalanffygrowthmodel
AT brunnernorbert ontheexponentinthevonbertalanffygrowthmodel
AT kuhleitnermanfred ontheexponentinthevonbertalanffygrowthmodel
AT nowakwernergeorg ontheexponentinthevonbertalanffygrowthmodel
AT scheicherklaus ontheexponentinthevonbertalanffygrowthmodel