Cargando…

Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients

OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of performing a second, repeat anterior maxillary distraction (AMD) to treat residual cleft maxillary hypoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients between the ages of 12 to 15 years with a history of AMD and with residual cleft maxillar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Sunil, Krishna, Shreya, Bansal, Avi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333371
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.6.407
_version_ 1783290768248537088
author Richardson, Sunil
Krishna, Shreya
Bansal, Avi
author_facet Richardson, Sunil
Krishna, Shreya
Bansal, Avi
author_sort Richardson, Sunil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of performing a second, repeat anterior maxillary distraction (AMD) to treat residual cleft maxillary hypoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients between the ages of 12 to 15 years with a history of AMD and with residual cleft maxillary hypoplasia were included in the study. Inclusion was irrespective of gender, type of cleft lip and palate, and the amount of advancement needed. Repeat AMD was executed in these patients 4 to 5 years after the primary AMD procedure to correct the cleft maxillary hypoplasia that had developed since the initial procedure. Orthopantomogram (OPG) and lateral cephalograms were taken for evaluation preoperatively, immediately after distraction, after consolidation, and one year postoperatively. The data obtained was tabulated and a Mann Whitney U-test was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: At the time of presentation, a residual maxillary hypoplasia was observed with a well maintained distraction gap on the OPG which ruled out the occurrence of a relapse. Favorable movement of the segments without any resistance was seen in all patients. Mean maxillary advancement of 10.56 mm was achieved at repeat AMD. Statistically significant increases in midfacial length, SNA angle, and nasion perpendicular to point A distance was achieved (P=0.012, P=0.011, and P=0.012, respectively). Good profile was achieved for all patients. Minimal transient complications, for example anterior open bite and bleeding episodes, were managed. CONCLUSION: Addressing the problem of cleft maxillary hypoplasia at an early age (12–15 years) is beneficial for the child. Residual hypoplasia may develop in some patients, which may require additional corrective procedures. The results of our study show that AMD can be repeated when residual deformity develops with the previous procedure having no negative impact on the results of the repeat procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57567982018-01-12 Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients Richardson, Sunil Krishna, Shreya Bansal, Avi J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of performing a second, repeat anterior maxillary distraction (AMD) to treat residual cleft maxillary hypoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients between the ages of 12 to 15 years with a history of AMD and with residual cleft maxillary hypoplasia were included in the study. Inclusion was irrespective of gender, type of cleft lip and palate, and the amount of advancement needed. Repeat AMD was executed in these patients 4 to 5 years after the primary AMD procedure to correct the cleft maxillary hypoplasia that had developed since the initial procedure. Orthopantomogram (OPG) and lateral cephalograms were taken for evaluation preoperatively, immediately after distraction, after consolidation, and one year postoperatively. The data obtained was tabulated and a Mann Whitney U-test was used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: At the time of presentation, a residual maxillary hypoplasia was observed with a well maintained distraction gap on the OPG which ruled out the occurrence of a relapse. Favorable movement of the segments without any resistance was seen in all patients. Mean maxillary advancement of 10.56 mm was achieved at repeat AMD. Statistically significant increases in midfacial length, SNA angle, and nasion perpendicular to point A distance was achieved (P=0.012, P=0.011, and P=0.012, respectively). Good profile was achieved for all patients. Minimal transient complications, for example anterior open bite and bleeding episodes, were managed. CONCLUSION: Addressing the problem of cleft maxillary hypoplasia at an early age (12–15 years) is beneficial for the child. Residual hypoplasia may develop in some patients, which may require additional corrective procedures. The results of our study show that AMD can be repeated when residual deformity develops with the previous procedure having no negative impact on the results of the repeat procedure. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2017-12 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5756798/ /pubmed/29333371 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.6.407 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Richardson, Sunil
Krishna, Shreya
Bansal, Avi
Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title_full Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title_fullStr Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title_short Use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
title_sort use of repeat anterior maxillary distraction to correct residual midface hypoplasia in cleft patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333371
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.6.407
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonsunil useofrepeatanteriormaxillarydistractiontocorrectresidualmidfacehypoplasiaincleftpatients
AT krishnashreya useofrepeatanteriormaxillarydistractiontocorrectresidualmidfacehypoplasiaincleftpatients
AT bansalavi useofrepeatanteriormaxillarydistractiontocorrectresidualmidfacehypoplasiaincleftpatients