Cargando…

Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spinal surgery. However, no clear definition of POUR currently exists, and no studies have evaluated the management of POUR. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status in spinal surgery p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kwang Suk, Koo, Kyo Chul, Chung, Byung Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Continence Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298471
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734994.497
_version_ 1783290773480931328
author Lee, Kwang Suk
Koo, Kyo Chul
Chung, Byung Ha
author_facet Lee, Kwang Suk
Koo, Kyo Chul
Chung, Byung Ha
author_sort Lee, Kwang Suk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spinal surgery. However, no clear definition of POUR currently exists, and no studies have evaluated the management of POUR. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status in spinal surgery patients. METHODS: The records of patients who received a urologic consultation for POUR from January 2015 to December 2016 were reviewed. POUR-free status was defined as a voiding volume (VV) >100 mL and a VV ratio >50%. Patients with an indwelling Foley catheter and those with any postoperative complications were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the primary management method (Foley catheterization [FC] or intermittent catheterization [IC]). RESULTS: In total, 205 patients (median age, 70.6 years) were evaluated. Significant prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status were intraoperative FC, previous spinal surgery, operative level (L3–5), lumbar fusion, and total volume (TV) at the time of POUR. Bladder training and medication did not reduce the time to POUR-free status. In patients who underwent FC, the duration of indwelling FC was a significant prognostic factor for POUR-free status. In a subanalysis, the TV (≥500 mL) and VV ratio at the time of POUR were significant prognostic factors for POUR-free status after primary management. Among the patients who achieved a POUR-free status, 8 (6.4%) experienced recurrent POUR. The VV ratio (<62.0%) was the only predictor of recurrent POUR. CONCLUSIONS: The criterion of POUR-free status is useful after spinal surgery. IC and FC were similar in their efficacy for the management of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Continence Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568202018-01-12 Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery Lee, Kwang Suk Koo, Kyo Chul Chung, Byung Ha Int Neurourol J Original Article PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spinal surgery. However, no clear definition of POUR currently exists, and no studies have evaluated the management of POUR. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status in spinal surgery patients. METHODS: The records of patients who received a urologic consultation for POUR from January 2015 to December 2016 were reviewed. POUR-free status was defined as a voiding volume (VV) >100 mL and a VV ratio >50%. Patients with an indwelling Foley catheter and those with any postoperative complications were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the primary management method (Foley catheterization [FC] or intermittent catheterization [IC]). RESULTS: In total, 205 patients (median age, 70.6 years) were evaluated. Significant prognostic factors for eventual POUR-free status were intraoperative FC, previous spinal surgery, operative level (L3–5), lumbar fusion, and total volume (TV) at the time of POUR. Bladder training and medication did not reduce the time to POUR-free status. In patients who underwent FC, the duration of indwelling FC was a significant prognostic factor for POUR-free status. In a subanalysis, the TV (≥500 mL) and VV ratio at the time of POUR were significant prognostic factors for POUR-free status after primary management. Among the patients who achieved a POUR-free status, 8 (6.4%) experienced recurrent POUR. The VV ratio (<62.0%) was the only predictor of recurrent POUR. CONCLUSIONS: The criterion of POUR-free status is useful after spinal surgery. IC and FC were similar in their efficacy for the management of these patients. Korean Continence Society 2017-12 2017-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5756820/ /pubmed/29298471 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734994.497 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Continence Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Kwang Suk
Koo, Kyo Chul
Chung, Byung Ha
Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title_full Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title_fullStr Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title_short Risk and Management of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Spinal Surgery
title_sort risk and management of postoperative urinary retention following spinal surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298471
http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1734994.497
work_keys_str_mv AT leekwangsuk riskandmanagementofpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingspinalsurgery
AT kookyochul riskandmanagementofpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingspinalsurgery
AT chungbyungha riskandmanagementofpostoperativeurinaryretentionfollowingspinalsurgery