Cargando…
Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684 |
_version_ | 1783290777444548608 |
---|---|
author | Dobeš, Christoph Scheffknecht, Susanne Fenko, Yulia Prohaska, Dagmar Sykora, Christina Hülber, Karl |
author_facet | Dobeš, Christoph Scheffknecht, Susanne Fenko, Yulia Prohaska, Dagmar Sykora, Christina Hülber, Karl |
author_sort | Dobeš, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed populations is affected by reproductive interferences mediated by cross‐pollination. Thereby, reproductive success of crosses depends on the difference in ploidy levels of mating partners, that is, on tolerance of deviation from the balanced ratio of maternal versus paternal genomes. Quality of pollen can further affect reproductive success in intercytotype pollinations. Cross‐fertilization, however, can be avoided by selfing which may be induced upon pollination with mixtures of self‐ and cross‐pollen (i.e., mentor effects). We tested for reproductive compatibility of naturally co‐occurring tetraploid sexuals and penta‐ to octoploid apomicts in the rosaceous species Potentilla puberula by means of controlled crosses. We estimated the role of selfing as a crossing barrier and effects of self‐ and cross‐pollen quality as well as maternal: paternal genomic ratios in the endosperm on reproductive success. Cross‐fertilization of sexuals by apomicts was not blocked by selfing, and seed set was reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thereby, seed set was negatively related to deviations from balanced parental genomic ratios in the endosperm. In contrast, seed set in the apomictic cytotypes was not reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thus, apomictic cytotypes either avoided intercytotype cross‐fertilization through selfing, tolerated intercytotype cross‐fertilizations without negative effects on reproductive success, or even benefitted from higher pollen quality in intercytotype pollinations. Our experiment provides evidence for asymmetric reproductive interference, in favor of the apomicts, with significantly reduced seed set of sexuals in cytologically mixed populations, whereas seed set in apomicts was not affected. Incompleteness of crossing barriers further indicated at least partial losses of a parental genomic endosperm balance requirement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5756837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57568372018-01-10 Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) Dobeš, Christoph Scheffknecht, Susanne Fenko, Yulia Prohaska, Dagmar Sykora, Christina Hülber, Karl Ecol Evol Original Research Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed populations is affected by reproductive interferences mediated by cross‐pollination. Thereby, reproductive success of crosses depends on the difference in ploidy levels of mating partners, that is, on tolerance of deviation from the balanced ratio of maternal versus paternal genomes. Quality of pollen can further affect reproductive success in intercytotype pollinations. Cross‐fertilization, however, can be avoided by selfing which may be induced upon pollination with mixtures of self‐ and cross‐pollen (i.e., mentor effects). We tested for reproductive compatibility of naturally co‐occurring tetraploid sexuals and penta‐ to octoploid apomicts in the rosaceous species Potentilla puberula by means of controlled crosses. We estimated the role of selfing as a crossing barrier and effects of self‐ and cross‐pollen quality as well as maternal: paternal genomic ratios in the endosperm on reproductive success. Cross‐fertilization of sexuals by apomicts was not blocked by selfing, and seed set was reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thereby, seed set was negatively related to deviations from balanced parental genomic ratios in the endosperm. In contrast, seed set in the apomictic cytotypes was not reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thus, apomictic cytotypes either avoided intercytotype cross‐fertilization through selfing, tolerated intercytotype cross‐fertilizations without negative effects on reproductive success, or even benefitted from higher pollen quality in intercytotype pollinations. Our experiment provides evidence for asymmetric reproductive interference, in favor of the apomicts, with significantly reduced seed set of sexuals in cytologically mixed populations, whereas seed set in apomicts was not affected. Incompleteness of crossing barriers further indicated at least partial losses of a parental genomic endosperm balance requirement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5756837/ /pubmed/29321878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dobeš, Christoph Scheffknecht, Susanne Fenko, Yulia Prohaska, Dagmar Sykora, Christina Hülber, Karl Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title | Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title_full | Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title_fullStr | Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title_full_unstemmed | Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title_short | Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) |
title_sort | asymmetric reproductive interference: the consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of potentilla puberula (rosaceae) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobeschristoph asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae AT scheffknechtsusanne asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae AT fenkoyulia asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae AT prohaskadagmar asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae AT sykorachristina asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae AT hulberkarl asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae |