Cargando…

Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)

Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobeš, Christoph, Scheffknecht, Susanne, Fenko, Yulia, Prohaska, Dagmar, Sykora, Christina, Hülber, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684
_version_ 1783290777444548608
author Dobeš, Christoph
Scheffknecht, Susanne
Fenko, Yulia
Prohaska, Dagmar
Sykora, Christina
Hülber, Karl
author_facet Dobeš, Christoph
Scheffknecht, Susanne
Fenko, Yulia
Prohaska, Dagmar
Sykora, Christina
Hülber, Karl
author_sort Dobeš, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed populations is affected by reproductive interferences mediated by cross‐pollination. Thereby, reproductive success of crosses depends on the difference in ploidy levels of mating partners, that is, on tolerance of deviation from the balanced ratio of maternal versus paternal genomes. Quality of pollen can further affect reproductive success in intercytotype pollinations. Cross‐fertilization, however, can be avoided by selfing which may be induced upon pollination with mixtures of self‐ and cross‐pollen (i.e., mentor effects). We tested for reproductive compatibility of naturally co‐occurring tetraploid sexuals and penta‐ to octoploid apomicts in the rosaceous species Potentilla puberula by means of controlled crosses. We estimated the role of selfing as a crossing barrier and effects of self‐ and cross‐pollen quality as well as maternal: paternal genomic ratios in the endosperm on reproductive success. Cross‐fertilization of sexuals by apomicts was not blocked by selfing, and seed set was reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thereby, seed set was negatively related to deviations from balanced parental genomic ratios in the endosperm. In contrast, seed set in the apomictic cytotypes was not reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thus, apomictic cytotypes either avoided intercytotype cross‐fertilization through selfing, tolerated intercytotype cross‐fertilizations without negative effects on reproductive success, or even benefitted from higher pollen quality in intercytotype pollinations. Our experiment provides evidence for asymmetric reproductive interference, in favor of the apomicts, with significantly reduced seed set of sexuals in cytologically mixed populations, whereas seed set in apomicts was not affected. Incompleteness of crossing barriers further indicated at least partial losses of a parental genomic endosperm balance requirement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568372018-01-10 Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae) Dobeš, Christoph Scheffknecht, Susanne Fenko, Yulia Prohaska, Dagmar Sykora, Christina Hülber, Karl Ecol Evol Original Research Apomixis evolves from a sexual background and usually is linked to polyploidization. Pseudogamous gametophytic apomicts, which require a fertilization to initiate seed development, of various ploidy levels frequently co‐occur with their lower‐ploid sexual ancestors, but the stability of such mixed populations is affected by reproductive interferences mediated by cross‐pollination. Thereby, reproductive success of crosses depends on the difference in ploidy levels of mating partners, that is, on tolerance of deviation from the balanced ratio of maternal versus paternal genomes. Quality of pollen can further affect reproductive success in intercytotype pollinations. Cross‐fertilization, however, can be avoided by selfing which may be induced upon pollination with mixtures of self‐ and cross‐pollen (i.e., mentor effects). We tested for reproductive compatibility of naturally co‐occurring tetraploid sexuals and penta‐ to octoploid apomicts in the rosaceous species Potentilla puberula by means of controlled crosses. We estimated the role of selfing as a crossing barrier and effects of self‐ and cross‐pollen quality as well as maternal: paternal genomic ratios in the endosperm on reproductive success. Cross‐fertilization of sexuals by apomicts was not blocked by selfing, and seed set was reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thereby, seed set was negatively related to deviations from balanced parental genomic ratios in the endosperm. In contrast, seed set in the apomictic cytotypes was not reduced in hetero‐ compared to homoploid crosses. Thus, apomictic cytotypes either avoided intercytotype cross‐fertilization through selfing, tolerated intercytotype cross‐fertilizations without negative effects on reproductive success, or even benefitted from higher pollen quality in intercytotype pollinations. Our experiment provides evidence for asymmetric reproductive interference, in favor of the apomicts, with significantly reduced seed set of sexuals in cytologically mixed populations, whereas seed set in apomicts was not affected. Incompleteness of crossing barriers further indicated at least partial losses of a parental genomic endosperm balance requirement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5756837/ /pubmed/29321878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dobeš, Christoph
Scheffknecht, Susanne
Fenko, Yulia
Prohaska, Dagmar
Sykora, Christina
Hülber, Karl
Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title_full Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title_fullStr Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title_short Asymmetric reproductive interference: The consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of Potentilla puberula (Rosaceae)
title_sort asymmetric reproductive interference: the consequences of cross‐pollination on reproductive success in sexual–apomictic populations of potentilla puberula (rosaceae)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3684
work_keys_str_mv AT dobeschristoph asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae
AT scheffknechtsusanne asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae
AT fenkoyulia asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae
AT prohaskadagmar asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae
AT sykorachristina asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae
AT hulberkarl asymmetricreproductiveinterferencetheconsequencesofcrosspollinationonreproductivesuccessinsexualapomicticpopulationsofpotentillapuberularosaceae