Cargando…

Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind

Projecting population responses to climate change requires an understanding of climatic impacts on key components of reproduction. Here, we investigate the associations among breeding phenology, climate and incubation schedules in the chestnut‐crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a 50 g passerin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capp, Elliot, Liebl, Andrea L., Cones, Alexandra G., Russell, Andrew F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3524
_version_ 1783290781943988224
author Capp, Elliot
Liebl, Andrea L.
Cones, Alexandra G.
Russell, Andrew F.
author_facet Capp, Elliot
Liebl, Andrea L.
Cones, Alexandra G.
Russell, Andrew F.
author_sort Capp, Elliot
collection PubMed
description Projecting population responses to climate change requires an understanding of climatic impacts on key components of reproduction. Here, we investigate the associations among breeding phenology, climate and incubation schedules in the chestnut‐crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a 50 g passerine with female‐only, intermittent incubation that typically breeds from late winter (July) to early summer (November). During daylight hours, breeding females spent an average of 33 min on the nest incubating (hereafter on‐bouts) followed by 24‐min foraging (hereafter off‐bouts), leading to an average daytime nest attentiveness of 60%. Nest attentiveness was 25% shorter than expected from allometric calculations, largely because off‐bout durations were double the expected value for a species with 16 g clutches (4 eggs × 4 g/egg). On‐bout durations and daily attentiveness were both negatively related to ambient temperature, presumably because increasing temperatures allowed more time to be allocated to foraging with reduced detriment to egg cooling. By contrast, on‐bout durations were positively associated with wind speed, in this case because increasing wind speed exacerbated egg cooling during off‐bouts. Despite an average temperature change of 12°C across the breeding season, breeding phenology had no effect on incubation schedules. This surprising result arose because of a positive relationship between temperature and wind speed across the breeding season: Any benefit of increasing temperatures was canceled by apparently detrimental consequences of increasing wind speed on egg cooling. Our results indicate that a greater appreciation for the associations among climatic variables and their independent effects on reproductive investment are necessary to understand the effects of changing climates on breeding phenology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568562018-01-10 Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind Capp, Elliot Liebl, Andrea L. Cones, Alexandra G. Russell, Andrew F. Ecol Evol Original Research Projecting population responses to climate change requires an understanding of climatic impacts on key components of reproduction. Here, we investigate the associations among breeding phenology, climate and incubation schedules in the chestnut‐crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a 50 g passerine with female‐only, intermittent incubation that typically breeds from late winter (July) to early summer (November). During daylight hours, breeding females spent an average of 33 min on the nest incubating (hereafter on‐bouts) followed by 24‐min foraging (hereafter off‐bouts), leading to an average daytime nest attentiveness of 60%. Nest attentiveness was 25% shorter than expected from allometric calculations, largely because off‐bout durations were double the expected value for a species with 16 g clutches (4 eggs × 4 g/egg). On‐bout durations and daily attentiveness were both negatively related to ambient temperature, presumably because increasing temperatures allowed more time to be allocated to foraging with reduced detriment to egg cooling. By contrast, on‐bout durations were positively associated with wind speed, in this case because increasing wind speed exacerbated egg cooling during off‐bouts. Despite an average temperature change of 12°C across the breeding season, breeding phenology had no effect on incubation schedules. This surprising result arose because of a positive relationship between temperature and wind speed across the breeding season: Any benefit of increasing temperatures was canceled by apparently detrimental consequences of increasing wind speed on egg cooling. Our results indicate that a greater appreciation for the associations among climatic variables and their independent effects on reproductive investment are necessary to understand the effects of changing climates on breeding phenology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5756856/ /pubmed/29321906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3524 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Capp, Elliot
Liebl, Andrea L.
Cones, Alexandra G.
Russell, Andrew F.
Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title_full Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title_fullStr Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title_full_unstemmed Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title_short Advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: Opposing effects of temperature and wind
title_sort advancing breeding phenology does not affect incubation schedules in chestnut‐crowned babblers: opposing effects of temperature and wind
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3524
work_keys_str_mv AT cappelliot advancingbreedingphenologydoesnotaffectincubationschedulesinchestnutcrownedbabblersopposingeffectsoftemperatureandwind
AT lieblandreal advancingbreedingphenologydoesnotaffectincubationschedulesinchestnutcrownedbabblersopposingeffectsoftemperatureandwind
AT conesalexandrag advancingbreedingphenologydoesnotaffectincubationschedulesinchestnutcrownedbabblersopposingeffectsoftemperatureandwind
AT russellandrewf advancingbreedingphenologydoesnotaffectincubationschedulesinchestnutcrownedbabblersopposingeffectsoftemperatureandwind