Cargando…

Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard

Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hamp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montagnani, Leonardo, Zanotelli, Damiano, Tagliavini, Massimo, Tomelleri, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633
_version_ 1783290785914945536
author Montagnani, Leonardo
Zanotelli, Damiano
Tagliavini, Massimo
Tomelleri, Enrico
author_facet Montagnani, Leonardo
Zanotelli, Damiano
Tagliavini, Massimo
Tomelleri, Enrico
author_sort Montagnani, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r (2) from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568732018-01-10 Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard Montagnani, Leonardo Zanotelli, Damiano Tagliavini, Massimo Tomelleri, Enrico Ecol Evol Original Research Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r (2) from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5756873/ /pubmed/29321882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Montagnani, Leonardo
Zanotelli, Damiano
Tagliavini, Massimo
Tomelleri, Enrico
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_full Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_fullStr Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_full_unstemmed Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_short Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_sort timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633
work_keys_str_mv AT montagnanileonardo timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT zanotellidamiano timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT tagliavinimassimo timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT tomellerienrico timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard