Cargando…

Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages

Biological changes occurring as a consequence of domestication and/or captivity are not still deeply known. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), endangered (Southern Europe) populations are enhanced by supportive breeding, which involves only 6 months of captive rearing following artificial spawning of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horreo, Jose L., Valiente, America G., Ardura, Alba, Blanco, Aida, Garcia‐Gonzalez, Claudia, Garcia‐Vazquez, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3555
_version_ 1783290786140389376
author Horreo, Jose L.
Valiente, America G.
Ardura, Alba
Blanco, Aida
Garcia‐Gonzalez, Claudia
Garcia‐Vazquez, Eva
author_facet Horreo, Jose L.
Valiente, America G.
Ardura, Alba
Blanco, Aida
Garcia‐Gonzalez, Claudia
Garcia‐Vazquez, Eva
author_sort Horreo, Jose L.
collection PubMed
description Biological changes occurring as a consequence of domestication and/or captivity are not still deeply known. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), endangered (Southern Europe) populations are enhanced by supportive breeding, which involves only 6 months of captive rearing following artificial spawning of wild‐collected adults. In this work, we assess whether several fitness‐correlated life‐history traits (migratory behavior, straying rate, age at maturity, and growth) are affected by early exposure to the captive environment within a generation, before reproduction thus before genetic selection. Results showed significant differences in growth and migratory behavior (including straying), associated with this very short period of captivity in natural fish populations, changing even genetic variability (decreased in hatchery‐reared adults) and the native population structure within and between rivers of the species. These changes appeared within a single generation, suggesting very short time of captivity is enough for initiating changes normally attributed to domestication. These results may have potential implications for the long‐term population stability/viability of species subjected to restoration and enhancement processes and could be also considered for the management of zoo populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568742018-01-10 Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages Horreo, Jose L. Valiente, America G. Ardura, Alba Blanco, Aida Garcia‐Gonzalez, Claudia Garcia‐Vazquez, Eva Ecol Evol Original Research Biological changes occurring as a consequence of domestication and/or captivity are not still deeply known. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), endangered (Southern Europe) populations are enhanced by supportive breeding, which involves only 6 months of captive rearing following artificial spawning of wild‐collected adults. In this work, we assess whether several fitness‐correlated life‐history traits (migratory behavior, straying rate, age at maturity, and growth) are affected by early exposure to the captive environment within a generation, before reproduction thus before genetic selection. Results showed significant differences in growth and migratory behavior (including straying), associated with this very short period of captivity in natural fish populations, changing even genetic variability (decreased in hatchery‐reared adults) and the native population structure within and between rivers of the species. These changes appeared within a single generation, suggesting very short time of captivity is enough for initiating changes normally attributed to domestication. These results may have potential implications for the long‐term population stability/viability of species subjected to restoration and enhancement processes and could be also considered for the management of zoo populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5756874/ /pubmed/29321890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3555 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Horreo, Jose L.
Valiente, America G.
Ardura, Alba
Blanco, Aida
Garcia‐Gonzalez, Claudia
Garcia‐Vazquez, Eva
Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title_full Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title_fullStr Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title_full_unstemmed Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title_short Nature versus nurture? Consequences of short captivity in early stages
title_sort nature versus nurture? consequences of short captivity in early stages
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3555
work_keys_str_mv AT horreojosel natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages
AT valienteamericag natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages
AT arduraalba natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages
AT blancoaida natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages
AT garciagonzalezclaudia natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages
AT garciavazquezeva natureversusnurtureconsequencesofshortcaptivityinearlystages