Cargando…

Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35

BACKGROUND: Studies addressing ethnic disparities and trends in liver transplantation for Asian population are scant. Objective: To examine the impact of Share 35 policy on Asian patients’ access to liver transplantation and outcomes since its implementation in June 2013. METHODS: A total of 11,910...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Zhang, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Avicenna Organ Transplantation Institute 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321832
_version_ 1783290791765999616
author Zhang, Y.
author_facet Zhang, Y.
author_sort Zhang, Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies addressing ethnic disparities and trends in liver transplantation for Asian population are scant. Objective: To examine the impact of Share 35 policy on Asian patients’ access to liver transplantation and outcomes since its implementation in June 2013. METHODS: A total of 11,910 adult white and Asian patients who were registered for deceased donor liver transplantation between 2012 and 2015, was identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Logistic regression and proportional hazard models with adjustment for demographic, clinical and geographic factors were used to model the access to liver transplantation and patient survival. Stratification on pre- and post-Share 35 periods was performed to compare the first 18 months of Share 35 policy to an equivalent period. RESULTS: Comparison of the pre- and post-Share 35 periods showed a significant decrease in time on waiting list and higher proportions of patients receiving liver transplantation for Asian patients. Asians shared similar transplant rates as whites (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.80–1.67) but experienced significantly longer waiting time (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34–0.92) before they received liver transplantation after Share 35 policy took effect. No significant post-transplantation survival difference was observed between Asians and whites at the 18-month outcome. CONCLUSION: Although benefited from the Share 35 policy, Asian patients are still at greater risk of disparities in access to liver transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Avicenna Organ Transplantation Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57568982018-01-10 Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35 Zhang, Y. Int J Organ Transplant Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Studies addressing ethnic disparities and trends in liver transplantation for Asian population are scant. Objective: To examine the impact of Share 35 policy on Asian patients’ access to liver transplantation and outcomes since its implementation in June 2013. METHODS: A total of 11,910 adult white and Asian patients who were registered for deceased donor liver transplantation between 2012 and 2015, was identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Logistic regression and proportional hazard models with adjustment for demographic, clinical and geographic factors were used to model the access to liver transplantation and patient survival. Stratification on pre- and post-Share 35 periods was performed to compare the first 18 months of Share 35 policy to an equivalent period. RESULTS: Comparison of the pre- and post-Share 35 periods showed a significant decrease in time on waiting list and higher proportions of patients receiving liver transplantation for Asian patients. Asians shared similar transplant rates as whites (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.80–1.67) but experienced significantly longer waiting time (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34–0.92) before they received liver transplantation after Share 35 policy took effect. No significant post-transplantation survival difference was observed between Asians and whites at the 18-month outcome. CONCLUSION: Although benefited from the Share 35 policy, Asian patients are still at greater risk of disparities in access to liver transplantation. Avicenna Organ Transplantation Institute 2017 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5756898/ /pubmed/29321832 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Y.
Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title_full Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title_fullStr Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title_full_unstemmed Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title_short Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35
title_sort access to liver transplantation and patient survival among asian populations: pre-share 35 vs post-share 35
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321832
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangy accesstolivertransplantationandpatientsurvivalamongasianpopulationspreshare35vspostshare35