Cargando…

Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, Sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lan, Xing, Guoqiang, Shuai, Shiquan, Guo, Zhiwei, Chen, Huaping, McClure, Morgan A., Chen, Xiaojuan, Mu, Qiwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097
_version_ 1783290794111664128
author Zhang, Lan
Xing, Guoqiang
Shuai, Shiquan
Guo, Zhiwei
Chen, Huaping
McClure, Morgan A.
Chen, Xiaojuan
Mu, Qiwen
author_facet Zhang, Lan
Xing, Guoqiang
Shuai, Shiquan
Guo, Zhiwei
Chen, Huaping
McClure, Morgan A.
Chen, Xiaojuan
Mu, Qiwen
author_sort Zhang, Lan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published before Jun 31, 2017. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies of 1 Hz LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere were included. Significant efficacy was found on finger flexibility (SMD = 0.75), hand strength (SMD = 0.49), and activity dexterity (SMD = 0.32), but not on body function (SMD = 0.29). The positive changes of rMT (SMD = 0.38 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = −0.83 for the unaffected hemisphere) and MEP (SMD = −1.00 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = 0.57 for the unaffected hemisphere) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: LF-rTMS as an add-on therapy significantly improved upper limb functional recovery especially the hand after stroke, probably through rebalanced cortical excitability of both hemispheres. Future studies should determine if LF-rTMS alone or in conjunction with practice/training would be more effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with unique identifier CRD42016042181.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5756908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57569082018-02-12 Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lan Xing, Guoqiang Shuai, Shiquan Guo, Zhiwei Chen, Huaping McClure, Morgan A. Chen, Xiaojuan Mu, Qiwen Neural Plast Review Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published before Jun 31, 2017. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies of 1 Hz LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere were included. Significant efficacy was found on finger flexibility (SMD = 0.75), hand strength (SMD = 0.49), and activity dexterity (SMD = 0.32), but not on body function (SMD = 0.29). The positive changes of rMT (SMD = 0.38 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = −0.83 for the unaffected hemisphere) and MEP (SMD = −1.00 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = 0.57 for the unaffected hemisphere) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: LF-rTMS as an add-on therapy significantly improved upper limb functional recovery especially the hand after stroke, probably through rebalanced cortical excitability of both hemispheres. Future studies should determine if LF-rTMS alone or in conjunction with practice/training would be more effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with unique identifier CRD42016042181. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5756908/ /pubmed/29435371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lan Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Zhang, Lan
Xing, Guoqiang
Shuai, Shiquan
Guo, Zhiwei
Chen, Huaping
McClure, Morgan A.
Chen, Xiaojuan
Mu, Qiwen
Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke-induced upper limb motor deficit: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT xingguoqiang lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT shuaishiquan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT guozhiwei lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT chenhuaping lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT mccluremorgana lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT chenxiaojuan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis
AT muqiwen lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis