Cargando…
Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, Sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097 |
_version_ | 1783290794111664128 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lan Xing, Guoqiang Shuai, Shiquan Guo, Zhiwei Chen, Huaping McClure, Morgan A. Chen, Xiaojuan Mu, Qiwen |
author_facet | Zhang, Lan Xing, Guoqiang Shuai, Shiquan Guo, Zhiwei Chen, Huaping McClure, Morgan A. Chen, Xiaojuan Mu, Qiwen |
author_sort | Zhang, Lan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published before Jun 31, 2017. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies of 1 Hz LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere were included. Significant efficacy was found on finger flexibility (SMD = 0.75), hand strength (SMD = 0.49), and activity dexterity (SMD = 0.32), but not on body function (SMD = 0.29). The positive changes of rMT (SMD = 0.38 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = −0.83 for the unaffected hemisphere) and MEP (SMD = −1.00 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = 0.57 for the unaffected hemisphere) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: LF-rTMS as an add-on therapy significantly improved upper limb functional recovery especially the hand after stroke, probably through rebalanced cortical excitability of both hemispheres. Future studies should determine if LF-rTMS alone or in conjunction with practice/training would be more effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with unique identifier CRD42016042181. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5756908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57569082018-02-12 Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lan Xing, Guoqiang Shuai, Shiquan Guo, Zhiwei Chen, Huaping McClure, Morgan A. Chen, Xiaojuan Mu, Qiwen Neural Plast Review Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke. METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published before Jun 31, 2017. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies of 1 Hz LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere were included. Significant efficacy was found on finger flexibility (SMD = 0.75), hand strength (SMD = 0.49), and activity dexterity (SMD = 0.32), but not on body function (SMD = 0.29). The positive changes of rMT (SMD = 0.38 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = −0.83 for the unaffected hemisphere) and MEP (SMD = −1.00 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = 0.57 for the unaffected hemisphere) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: LF-rTMS as an add-on therapy significantly improved upper limb functional recovery especially the hand after stroke, probably through rebalanced cortical excitability of both hemispheres. Future studies should determine if LF-rTMS alone or in conjunction with practice/training would be more effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This trial is registered with unique identifier CRD42016042181. Hindawi 2017 2017-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5756908/ /pubmed/29435371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lan Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Zhang, Lan Xing, Guoqiang Shuai, Shiquan Guo, Zhiwei Chen, Huaping McClure, Morgan A. Chen, Xiaojuan Mu, Qiwen Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke-induced upper limb motor deficit: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5756908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2758097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT xingguoqiang lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT shuaishiquan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT guozhiwei lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT chenhuaping lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT mccluremorgana lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT chenxiaojuan lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis AT muqiwen lowfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforstrokeinducedupperlimbmotordeficitametaanalysis |