Cargando…

Emodin and baicalein inhibit sodium taurocholate-induced vacuole formation in pancreatic acinar cells

AIM: To investigate the effects of combined use of emodin and baicalein (CEB) at the cellular and organism levels in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and explore the underlying mechanism. METHODS: SAP was induced by retrograde infusion of 5% sodium taurocholate into the pancreatic duct in 48 male SD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, Zhou, Rui, Bie, Bei-Bei, Huang, Na, Guo, Ying, Chen, Hai-Yan, Shi, Meng-Jiao, Yang, Jun, Zhang, Jian, Li, Zong-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358880
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.35
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To investigate the effects of combined use of emodin and baicalein (CEB) at the cellular and organism levels in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and explore the underlying mechanism. METHODS: SAP was induced by retrograde infusion of 5% sodium taurocholate into the pancreatic duct in 48 male SD rats. Pancreatic histopathology score, serum amylase activity, and levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and IL-10 were determined to assess the effects of CEB at 12 h after the surgery. The rat pancreatic acinar cells were isolated from healthy male SD rats using collagenase. The cell viability, cell ultrastructure, intracellular free Ca(2+) concentration, and inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor (IP(3)R) expression were investigated to assess the mechanism of CEB. RESULTS: Pancreatic histopathology score (2.07 ± 1.20 vs 6.84 ± 1.13, P < 0.05) and serum amylase activity (2866.2 ± 617.7 vs 5241.3 ± 1410.0, P < 0.05) were significantly decreased in the CEB (three doses) treatment group compared with the SAP group (2.07 ± 1.20 vs 6.84 ± 1.13, P < 0.05). CEB dose-dependently reduced the levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (466.82 ± 48.55 vs 603.50 ± 75.53, P < 0.05) and TNF-α (108.04 ± 16.10 vs 215.56 ± 74.67, P < 0.05) and increased the level of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (200.96 ± 50.76 vs 54.18 ± 6.07, P < 0.05) compared with those in the SAP group. CEB increased cell viability, inhibited cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration, and significantly ameliorated intracellular vacuoles and IP(3) mRNA expression compared with those in the SAP group (P < 0.05). There was a trend towards decreased IP(3)R protein in the CEB treatment group; however, it did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results at the cellular and organism levels reflect a preliminary mechanism of CEB in SAP and indicate that CEB is a suitable approach for SAP treatment.