Cargando…

Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives

CONTEXT: As obesity has become increasingly widespread, scientists seek better ways to assess and modify built and social environments to positively impact health. The applicable methods and concepts draw on multiple disciplines and require collaboration and cross-learning. This paper describes the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glanz, Karen, Handy, Susan L., Henderson, Kathryn E., Slater, Sandy J., Davis, Erica L., Powell, Lisa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.002
_version_ 1783290886885474304
author Glanz, Karen
Handy, Susan L.
Henderson, Kathryn E.
Slater, Sandy J.
Davis, Erica L.
Powell, Lisa M.
author_facet Glanz, Karen
Handy, Susan L.
Henderson, Kathryn E.
Slater, Sandy J.
Davis, Erica L.
Powell, Lisa M.
author_sort Glanz, Karen
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: As obesity has become increasingly widespread, scientists seek better ways to assess and modify built and social environments to positively impact health. The applicable methods and concepts draw on multiple disciplines and require collaboration and cross-learning. This paper describes the results of an expert team׳s analysis of how key disciplinary perspectives contribute to environmental context-based assessment related to obesity, identifies gaps, and suggests opportunities to encourage effective advances in this arena. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A team of experts representing diverse disciplines convened in 2013 to discuss the contributions of their respective disciplines to assessing built environments relevant to obesity prevention. The disciplines include urban planning, public health nutrition, exercise science, physical activity research, public health and epidemiology, behavioral and social sciences, and economics. Each expert identified key concepts and measures from their discipline, and applications to built environment assessment and action. A selective review of published literature and internet-based information was conducted in 2013 and 2014. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The key points that are highlighted in this article were identified in 2014–2015 through discussion, debate and consensus-building among the team of experts. Results focus on the various disciplines׳ perspectives and tools, recommendations, progress and gaps. CONCLUSIONS: There has been significant progress in collaboration across key disciplines that contribute to studies of built environments and obesity, but important gaps remain. Using lessons from interprofessional education and team science, along with appreciation of and attention to other disciplines׳ contributions, can promote more effective cross-disciplinary collaboration in obesity prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5757767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57577672018-01-18 Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives Glanz, Karen Handy, Susan L. Henderson, Kathryn E. Slater, Sandy J. Davis, Erica L. Powell, Lisa M. SSM Popul Health Article CONTEXT: As obesity has become increasingly widespread, scientists seek better ways to assess and modify built and social environments to positively impact health. The applicable methods and concepts draw on multiple disciplines and require collaboration and cross-learning. This paper describes the results of an expert team׳s analysis of how key disciplinary perspectives contribute to environmental context-based assessment related to obesity, identifies gaps, and suggests opportunities to encourage effective advances in this arena. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A team of experts representing diverse disciplines convened in 2013 to discuss the contributions of their respective disciplines to assessing built environments relevant to obesity prevention. The disciplines include urban planning, public health nutrition, exercise science, physical activity research, public health and epidemiology, behavioral and social sciences, and economics. Each expert identified key concepts and measures from their discipline, and applications to built environment assessment and action. A selective review of published literature and internet-based information was conducted in 2013 and 2014. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The key points that are highlighted in this article were identified in 2014–2015 through discussion, debate and consensus-building among the team of experts. Results focus on the various disciplines׳ perspectives and tools, recommendations, progress and gaps. CONCLUSIONS: There has been significant progress in collaboration across key disciplines that contribute to studies of built environments and obesity, but important gaps remain. Using lessons from interprofessional education and team science, along with appreciation of and attention to other disciplines׳ contributions, can promote more effective cross-disciplinary collaboration in obesity prevention. Elsevier 2016-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5757767/ /pubmed/29349125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Glanz, Karen
Handy, Susan L.
Henderson, Kathryn E.
Slater, Sandy J.
Davis, Erica L.
Powell, Lisa M.
Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title_full Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title_fullStr Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title_short Built environment assessment: Multidisciplinary perspectives
title_sort built environment assessment: multidisciplinary perspectives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT glanzkaren builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives
AT handysusanl builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives
AT hendersonkathryne builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives
AT slatersandyj builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives
AT daviserical builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives
AT powelllisam builtenvironmentassessmentmultidisciplinaryperspectives