Cargando…
Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390 |
_version_ | 1783290912457097216 |
---|---|
author | Ping, Weiwei Cao, Wenjun Tan, Hongzhuan Guo, Chongzheng Dou, Zhiyong Yang, Jianzhou |
author_facet | Ping, Weiwei Cao, Wenjun Tan, Hongzhuan Guo, Chongzheng Dou, Zhiyong Yang, Jianzhou |
author_sort | Ping, Weiwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis. RESULTS: The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34. CONCLUSIONS: HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5757924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57579242018-01-22 Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation Ping, Weiwei Cao, Wenjun Tan, Hongzhuan Guo, Chongzheng Dou, Zhiyong Yang, Jianzhou PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis. RESULTS: The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34. CONCLUSIONS: HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults. Public Library of Science 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5757924/ /pubmed/29309423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390 Text en © 2018 Ping et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ping, Weiwei Cao, Wenjun Tan, Hongzhuan Guo, Chongzheng Dou, Zhiyong Yang, Jianzhou Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title | Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title_full | Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title_fullStr | Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title_short | Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation |
title_sort | health protective behavior scale: development and psychometric evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pingweiwei healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation AT caowenjun healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation AT tanhongzhuan healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation AT guochongzheng healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation AT douzhiyong healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation AT yangjianzhou healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation |