Cargando…

Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation

OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ping, Weiwei, Cao, Wenjun, Tan, Hongzhuan, Guo, Chongzheng, Dou, Zhiyong, Yang, Jianzhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390
_version_ 1783290912457097216
author Ping, Weiwei
Cao, Wenjun
Tan, Hongzhuan
Guo, Chongzheng
Dou, Zhiyong
Yang, Jianzhou
author_facet Ping, Weiwei
Cao, Wenjun
Tan, Hongzhuan
Guo, Chongzheng
Dou, Zhiyong
Yang, Jianzhou
author_sort Ping, Weiwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis. RESULTS: The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34. CONCLUSIONS: HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5757924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57579242018-01-22 Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation Ping, Weiwei Cao, Wenjun Tan, Hongzhuan Guo, Chongzheng Dou, Zhiyong Yang, Jianzhou PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. METHODS: An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis. RESULTS: The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34. CONCLUSIONS: HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults. Public Library of Science 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5757924/ /pubmed/29309423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390 Text en © 2018 Ping et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ping, Weiwei
Cao, Wenjun
Tan, Hongzhuan
Guo, Chongzheng
Dou, Zhiyong
Yang, Jianzhou
Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title_full Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title_fullStr Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title_short Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation
title_sort health protective behavior scale: development and psychometric evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5757924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190390
work_keys_str_mv AT pingweiwei healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation
AT caowenjun healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation
AT tanhongzhuan healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation
AT guochongzheng healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation
AT douzhiyong healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation
AT yangjianzhou healthprotectivebehaviorscaledevelopmentandpsychometricevaluation