Cargando…

An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention

The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, Bonnie, Laycock, Robin, Crewther, David P., Crewther, Sheila G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638
_version_ 1783290997824815104
author Alexander, Bonnie
Laycock, Robin
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
author_facet Alexander, Bonnie
Laycock, Robin
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
author_sort Alexander, Bonnie
collection PubMed
description The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In particular, we were interested in the relative critical times for two intraparietal sulcus (IPS) sites in comparison to that previously identified for motion processing in area V5, and to explore potential earlier times of involvement. fMRI was used to individually localize V5 and middle and posterior intraparietal sulcus (mIPS; pIPS) areas active for a motion driven attention task, prior to TMS neuronavigation. Paired-pulse TMS was applied during performance of the same task at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) ranging from 0 to 180 ms. There were no statistically significant decreases in performance accuracy for trials where TMS was applied to V5 at any SOA, though stimulation intensity was lower for this site than for the parietal sites. For TMS applied to mIPS, there was a trend toward a relative decrease in performance accuracy at the 150 ms SOA, as well as a relative increase at 180 ms. There was no statistically significant effect overall of TMS applied to pIPS, however, there appeared a potential trend toward a decrease in performance at the 0 ms SOA. Overall, these results provide some patterns of potential theoretical interest to follow up in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5758491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57584912018-01-19 An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention Alexander, Bonnie Laycock, Robin Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In particular, we were interested in the relative critical times for two intraparietal sulcus (IPS) sites in comparison to that previously identified for motion processing in area V5, and to explore potential earlier times of involvement. fMRI was used to individually localize V5 and middle and posterior intraparietal sulcus (mIPS; pIPS) areas active for a motion driven attention task, prior to TMS neuronavigation. Paired-pulse TMS was applied during performance of the same task at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) ranging from 0 to 180 ms. There were no statistically significant decreases in performance accuracy for trials where TMS was applied to V5 at any SOA, though stimulation intensity was lower for this site than for the parietal sites. For TMS applied to mIPS, there was a trend toward a relative decrease in performance accuracy at the 150 ms SOA, as well as a relative increase at 180 ms. There was no statistically significant effect overall of TMS applied to pIPS, however, there appeared a potential trend toward a decrease in performance at the 0 ms SOA. Overall, these results provide some patterns of potential theoretical interest to follow up in future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5758491/ /pubmed/29354043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638 Text en Copyright © 2018 Alexander, Laycock, Crewther and Crewther. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Alexander, Bonnie
Laycock, Robin
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title_full An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title_fullStr An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title_full_unstemmed An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title_short An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
title_sort fmri-neuronavigated chronometric tms investigation of v5 and intraparietal cortex in motion driven attention
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderbonnie anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT laycockrobin anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT crewtherdavidp anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT crewthersheilag anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT alexanderbonnie fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT laycockrobin fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT crewtherdavidp fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention
AT crewthersheilag fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention