Cargando…
An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention
The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In par...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638 |
_version_ | 1783290997824815104 |
---|---|
author | Alexander, Bonnie Laycock, Robin Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. |
author_facet | Alexander, Bonnie Laycock, Robin Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. |
author_sort | Alexander, Bonnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In particular, we were interested in the relative critical times for two intraparietal sulcus (IPS) sites in comparison to that previously identified for motion processing in area V5, and to explore potential earlier times of involvement. fMRI was used to individually localize V5 and middle and posterior intraparietal sulcus (mIPS; pIPS) areas active for a motion driven attention task, prior to TMS neuronavigation. Paired-pulse TMS was applied during performance of the same task at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) ranging from 0 to 180 ms. There were no statistically significant decreases in performance accuracy for trials where TMS was applied to V5 at any SOA, though stimulation intensity was lower for this site than for the parietal sites. For TMS applied to mIPS, there was a trend toward a relative decrease in performance accuracy at the 150 ms SOA, as well as a relative increase at 180 ms. There was no statistically significant effect overall of TMS applied to pIPS, however, there appeared a potential trend toward a decrease in performance at the 0 ms SOA. Overall, these results provide some patterns of potential theoretical interest to follow up in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5758491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57584912018-01-19 An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention Alexander, Bonnie Laycock, Robin Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The timing of networked brain activity subserving motion driven attention in humans is currently unclear. Functional MRI (fMRI)-neuronavigated chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate critical times of parietal cortex involvement in motion driven attention. In particular, we were interested in the relative critical times for two intraparietal sulcus (IPS) sites in comparison to that previously identified for motion processing in area V5, and to explore potential earlier times of involvement. fMRI was used to individually localize V5 and middle and posterior intraparietal sulcus (mIPS; pIPS) areas active for a motion driven attention task, prior to TMS neuronavigation. Paired-pulse TMS was applied during performance of the same task at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) ranging from 0 to 180 ms. There were no statistically significant decreases in performance accuracy for trials where TMS was applied to V5 at any SOA, though stimulation intensity was lower for this site than for the parietal sites. For TMS applied to mIPS, there was a trend toward a relative decrease in performance accuracy at the 150 ms SOA, as well as a relative increase at 180 ms. There was no statistically significant effect overall of TMS applied to pIPS, however, there appeared a potential trend toward a decrease in performance at the 0 ms SOA. Overall, these results provide some patterns of potential theoretical interest to follow up in future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5758491/ /pubmed/29354043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638 Text en Copyright © 2018 Alexander, Laycock, Crewther and Crewther. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Alexander, Bonnie Laycock, Robin Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title | An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title_full | An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title_fullStr | An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title_full_unstemmed | An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title_short | An fMRI-Neuronavigated Chronometric TMS Investigation of V5 and Intraparietal Cortex in Motion Driven Attention |
title_sort | fmri-neuronavigated chronometric tms investigation of v5 and intraparietal cortex in motion driven attention |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderbonnie anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT laycockrobin anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT crewtherdavidp anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT crewthersheilag anfmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT alexanderbonnie fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT laycockrobin fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT crewtherdavidp fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention AT crewthersheilag fmrineuronavigatedchronometrictmsinvestigationofv5andintraparietalcortexinmotiondrivenattention |