Cargando…

Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture

On the surface, bi- and multilingualism would seem to be an ideal context for exploring questions of typological proximity. The obvious intuition is that the more closely related two languages are, the easier it should be to implement the two languages in one mind. This is the starting point adopted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putnam, Michael T., Carlson, Matthew, Reitter, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212
_version_ 1783291019114053632
author Putnam, Michael T.
Carlson, Matthew
Reitter, David
author_facet Putnam, Michael T.
Carlson, Matthew
Reitter, David
author_sort Putnam, Michael T.
collection PubMed
description On the surface, bi- and multilingualism would seem to be an ideal context for exploring questions of typological proximity. The obvious intuition is that the more closely related two languages are, the easier it should be to implement the two languages in one mind. This is the starting point adopted here, but we immediately run into the difficulty that the overwhelming majority of cognitive, computational, and linguistic research on bi- and multilingualism exhibits a monolingual bias (i.e., where monolingual grammars are used as the standard of comparison for outputs from bilingual grammars). The primary questions so far have focused on how bilinguals balance and switch between their two languages, but our perspective on typology leads us to consider the nature of bi- and multi-lingual systems as a whole. Following an initial proposal from Hsin (2014), we conjecture that bilingual grammars are neither isolated, nor (completely) conjoined with one another in the bilingual mind, but rather exist as integrated source grammars that are further mitigated by a common, combined grammar (Cook, 2016; Goldrick et al., 2016a,b; Putnam and Klosinski, 2017). Here we conceive such a combined grammar in a parallel, distributed, and gradient architecture implemented in a shared vector-space model that employs compression through routinization and dimensionality reduction. We discuss the emergence of such representations and their function in the minds of bilinguals. This architecture aims to be consistent with empirical results on bilingual cognition and memory representations in computational cognitive architectures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5758582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57585822018-01-19 Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture Putnam, Michael T. Carlson, Matthew Reitter, David Front Psychol Psychology On the surface, bi- and multilingualism would seem to be an ideal context for exploring questions of typological proximity. The obvious intuition is that the more closely related two languages are, the easier it should be to implement the two languages in one mind. This is the starting point adopted here, but we immediately run into the difficulty that the overwhelming majority of cognitive, computational, and linguistic research on bi- and multilingualism exhibits a monolingual bias (i.e., where monolingual grammars are used as the standard of comparison for outputs from bilingual grammars). The primary questions so far have focused on how bilinguals balance and switch between their two languages, but our perspective on typology leads us to consider the nature of bi- and multi-lingual systems as a whole. Following an initial proposal from Hsin (2014), we conjecture that bilingual grammars are neither isolated, nor (completely) conjoined with one another in the bilingual mind, but rather exist as integrated source grammars that are further mitigated by a common, combined grammar (Cook, 2016; Goldrick et al., 2016a,b; Putnam and Klosinski, 2017). Here we conceive such a combined grammar in a parallel, distributed, and gradient architecture implemented in a shared vector-space model that employs compression through routinization and dimensionality reduction. We discuss the emergence of such representations and their function in the minds of bilinguals. This architecture aims to be consistent with empirical results on bilingual cognition and memory representations in computational cognitive architectures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5758582/ /pubmed/29354079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212 Text en Copyright © 2018 Putnam, Carlson and Reitter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Putnam, Michael T.
Carlson, Matthew
Reitter, David
Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title_full Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title_fullStr Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title_full_unstemmed Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title_short Integrated, Not Isolated: Defining Typological Proximity in an Integrated Multilingual Architecture
title_sort integrated, not isolated: defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212
work_keys_str_mv AT putnammichaelt integratednotisolateddefiningtypologicalproximityinanintegratedmultilingualarchitecture
AT carlsonmatthew integratednotisolateddefiningtypologicalproximityinanintegratedmultilingualarchitecture
AT reitterdavid integratednotisolateddefiningtypologicalproximityinanintegratedmultilingualarchitecture