Cargando…

Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells

Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares, Ricardo J, Maglieri, Giulia, Gutschner, Tony, Diederichs, Sven, Lund, Anders H, Nielsen, Boye S, Holmstrøm, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946
_version_ 1783291080766128128
author Soares, Ricardo J
Maglieri, Giulia
Gutschner, Tony
Diederichs, Sven
Lund, Anders H
Nielsen, Boye S
Holmstrøm, Kim
author_facet Soares, Ricardo J
Maglieri, Giulia
Gutschner, Tony
Diederichs, Sven
Lund, Anders H
Nielsen, Boye S
Holmstrøm, Kim
author_sort Soares, Ricardo J
collection PubMed
description Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach with or without enzymatic signal amplification, a branched-DNA (bDNA) probe and an LNA-modified probe with enzymatic signal amplification. All four methods adequately stained MALAT1 in the nucleus in all of three cell lines investigated, HeLa, NHDF and T47D, and three of the methods detected the less expressed CYTOR. The sensitivity of the four ISH methods was evaluated by image analysis. In all three cell lines, the two methods involving enzymatic amplification gave the most intense MALAT1 signal, but the signal-to-background ratios were not different. CYTOR was best detected using the bDNA method. All four ISH methods showed significantly reduced MALAT1 signal in knock-out cells, and siRNA-induced knock-down of CYTOR resulted in significantly reduced CYTOR ISH signal, indicating good specificity of the probe designs and detection systems. Our data suggest that the ISH methods allow detection of both abundant and less abundantly expressed lncRNAs, although the latter required the use of the most specific and sensitive probe detection system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5758870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57588702018-01-16 Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells Soares, Ricardo J Maglieri, Giulia Gutschner, Tony Diederichs, Sven Lund, Anders H Nielsen, Boye S Holmstrøm, Kim Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach with or without enzymatic signal amplification, a branched-DNA (bDNA) probe and an LNA-modified probe with enzymatic signal amplification. All four methods adequately stained MALAT1 in the nucleus in all of three cell lines investigated, HeLa, NHDF and T47D, and three of the methods detected the less expressed CYTOR. The sensitivity of the four ISH methods was evaluated by image analysis. In all three cell lines, the two methods involving enzymatic amplification gave the most intense MALAT1 signal, but the signal-to-background ratios were not different. CYTOR was best detected using the bDNA method. All four ISH methods showed significantly reduced MALAT1 signal in knock-out cells, and siRNA-induced knock-down of CYTOR resulted in significantly reduced CYTOR ISH signal, indicating good specificity of the probe designs and detection systems. Our data suggest that the ISH methods allow detection of both abundant and less abundantly expressed lncRNAs, although the latter required the use of the most specific and sensitive probe detection system. Oxford University Press 2018-01-09 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5758870/ /pubmed/29059327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Methods Online
Soares, Ricardo J
Maglieri, Giulia
Gutschner, Tony
Diederichs, Sven
Lund, Anders H
Nielsen, Boye S
Holmstrøm, Kim
Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title_full Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title_fullStr Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title_short Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
title_sort evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding rna expression in cultured cells
topic Methods Online
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresricardoj evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT maglierigiulia evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT gutschnertony evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT diederichssven evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT lundandersh evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT nielsenboyes evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells
AT holmstrømkim evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells