Cargando…
Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells
Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946 |
_version_ | 1783291080766128128 |
---|---|
author | Soares, Ricardo J Maglieri, Giulia Gutschner, Tony Diederichs, Sven Lund, Anders H Nielsen, Boye S Holmstrøm, Kim |
author_facet | Soares, Ricardo J Maglieri, Giulia Gutschner, Tony Diederichs, Sven Lund, Anders H Nielsen, Boye S Holmstrøm, Kim |
author_sort | Soares, Ricardo J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach with or without enzymatic signal amplification, a branched-DNA (bDNA) probe and an LNA-modified probe with enzymatic signal amplification. All four methods adequately stained MALAT1 in the nucleus in all of three cell lines investigated, HeLa, NHDF and T47D, and three of the methods detected the less expressed CYTOR. The sensitivity of the four ISH methods was evaluated by image analysis. In all three cell lines, the two methods involving enzymatic amplification gave the most intense MALAT1 signal, but the signal-to-background ratios were not different. CYTOR was best detected using the bDNA method. All four ISH methods showed significantly reduced MALAT1 signal in knock-out cells, and siRNA-induced knock-down of CYTOR resulted in significantly reduced CYTOR ISH signal, indicating good specificity of the probe designs and detection systems. Our data suggest that the ISH methods allow detection of both abundant and less abundantly expressed lncRNAs, although the latter required the use of the most specific and sensitive probe detection system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5758870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57588702018-01-16 Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells Soares, Ricardo J Maglieri, Giulia Gutschner, Tony Diederichs, Sven Lund, Anders H Nielsen, Boye S Holmstrøm, Kim Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online Deciphering the functions of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is facilitated by visualization of their subcellular localization using in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. We evaluated four different ISH methods for detection of MALAT1 and CYTOR in cultured cells: a multiple probe detection approach with or without enzymatic signal amplification, a branched-DNA (bDNA) probe and an LNA-modified probe with enzymatic signal amplification. All four methods adequately stained MALAT1 in the nucleus in all of three cell lines investigated, HeLa, NHDF and T47D, and three of the methods detected the less expressed CYTOR. The sensitivity of the four ISH methods was evaluated by image analysis. In all three cell lines, the two methods involving enzymatic amplification gave the most intense MALAT1 signal, but the signal-to-background ratios were not different. CYTOR was best detected using the bDNA method. All four ISH methods showed significantly reduced MALAT1 signal in knock-out cells, and siRNA-induced knock-down of CYTOR resulted in significantly reduced CYTOR ISH signal, indicating good specificity of the probe designs and detection systems. Our data suggest that the ISH methods allow detection of both abundant and less abundantly expressed lncRNAs, although the latter required the use of the most specific and sensitive probe detection system. Oxford University Press 2018-01-09 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5758870/ /pubmed/29059327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946 Text en © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Soares, Ricardo J Maglieri, Giulia Gutschner, Tony Diederichs, Sven Lund, Anders H Nielsen, Boye S Holmstrøm, Kim Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title | Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title_full | Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title_short | Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding RNA expression in cultured cells |
title_sort | evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to study long non-coding rna expression in cultured cells |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soaresricardoj evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT maglierigiulia evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT gutschnertony evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT diederichssven evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT lundandersh evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT nielsenboyes evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells AT holmstrømkim evaluationoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationtechniquestostudylongnoncodingrnaexpressioninculturedcells |