Cargando…

Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005–2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haresh, Kunhi Parambath, Gandhi, Ajeet Kumar, Mallick, Supriya, Benson, Rony, Gupta, Subhash, Sharma, Daya Nand, Julka, Pramod Kumar, Rath, Goura Kisor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333005
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_202_15
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005–2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and the impact of prognostic factors was determined using univariate analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard model. SPSS version 21.0 was used for all statistical analysis. RESULTS: Male:female ratio was 29:11. Gross total resection: subtotal resection or less was 42.5%: 57.5%. A total of 16 patients (40%) had anaplastic histology. All except two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]) and 10 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (6 carboplatin plus etoposide; 4 TMZ). Median follows up was 18 months (2–60 months). Median DFS for the entire cohort was 22.42 months. The estimated 1, 2, and 3 years DFS was found to be 58.5%, 41%, and 30.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients receiving higher radiation dose (56 Gray vs. 60 Gray; hazard ratio [HR] 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.142–0.9553; P = 0.02) and lower MIB labeling index (<20 vs. ≥20; HR 0.238; 95% CI 0.092–0.617; P = 0.001) had a better DFS. Higher radiation dose continued to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064–0.856; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: ICE has guarded prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy to a higher radiation dose improves survival. Higher MIB labeling index connotes a dismal survival despite the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.