Cargando…

The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND: Successful tuberculosis (TB) treatment is essential to effective TB control. TB-HIV coinfection, social determinants and access to services influenced by rural residence can affect treatment outcome. We examined the separate and joint effects of rural residence and HIV infection on poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamu, Aishatu Lawal, Aliyu, Muktar H., Galadanci, Najiba Aliyu, Musa, Baba Maiyaki, Lawan, Umar Muhammad, Bashir, Usman, Abubakar, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0714-8
_version_ 1783291147310858240
author Adamu, Aishatu Lawal
Aliyu, Muktar H.
Galadanci, Najiba Aliyu
Musa, Baba Maiyaki
Lawan, Umar Muhammad
Bashir, Usman
Abubakar, Ibrahim
author_facet Adamu, Aishatu Lawal
Aliyu, Muktar H.
Galadanci, Najiba Aliyu
Musa, Baba Maiyaki
Lawan, Umar Muhammad
Bashir, Usman
Abubakar, Ibrahim
author_sort Adamu, Aishatu Lawal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful tuberculosis (TB) treatment is essential to effective TB control. TB-HIV coinfection, social determinants and access to services influenced by rural residence can affect treatment outcome. We examined the separate and joint effects of rural residence and HIV infection on poor treatment outcome among patients enrolled in a large TB treatment centre in Kano, Nigeria. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of patients with TB enrolled in a large urban TB clinic in northern Nigeria, from January 2010 to December 2014. Poor treatment outcome was defined as death, default or treatment failure. We used Poisson regression to model rates and determine the relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals, CI) of poor treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1381 patients included in the analysis, 28.4% were rural residents; 39.8% were HIV-positive; and 46.1% had a poor treatment outcome. Approximately 65 and 38% of rural and urban residents, respectively, had a poor treatment outcome. Rural residents had 2.74 times (95% CI: 2.27–3.29) the risk of having a poor treatment outcome compared to urban residents. HIV-positive patients had 1.4 times (95% CI: 1.16–1.69) the risk of poor treatment outcome compared to HIV-negative patients. The proportion of poor treatment outcome attributable to rural residence (population attributable fraction, PAF) was 25.6%. The PAF for HIV infection was 11.9%. The effect of rural residence on poor treatment outcome among HIV-negative patients (aRR:4.07; 95%CI:3.15–5.25) was more than twice that among HIV-positive patients (aRR:1.99; 95%CI:1.49–2.64). CONCLUSION: Rural residents attending a large Nigerian TB clinic are at increased risk of having poor treatment outcomes, and this risk is amplified among those that are HIV-negative. Our findings indicate that rural coverage of HIV services may be better than TB services. These findings highlight the importance of expanding coverage of TB services to ensure prompt diagnosis and commencement of treatment, especially among rural-dwellers in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57591832018-01-10 The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis Adamu, Aishatu Lawal Aliyu, Muktar H. Galadanci, Najiba Aliyu Musa, Baba Maiyaki Lawan, Umar Muhammad Bashir, Usman Abubakar, Ibrahim Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Successful tuberculosis (TB) treatment is essential to effective TB control. TB-HIV coinfection, social determinants and access to services influenced by rural residence can affect treatment outcome. We examined the separate and joint effects of rural residence and HIV infection on poor treatment outcome among patients enrolled in a large TB treatment centre in Kano, Nigeria. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of patients with TB enrolled in a large urban TB clinic in northern Nigeria, from January 2010 to December 2014. Poor treatment outcome was defined as death, default or treatment failure. We used Poisson regression to model rates and determine the relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals, CI) of poor treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1381 patients included in the analysis, 28.4% were rural residents; 39.8% were HIV-positive; and 46.1% had a poor treatment outcome. Approximately 65 and 38% of rural and urban residents, respectively, had a poor treatment outcome. Rural residents had 2.74 times (95% CI: 2.27–3.29) the risk of having a poor treatment outcome compared to urban residents. HIV-positive patients had 1.4 times (95% CI: 1.16–1.69) the risk of poor treatment outcome compared to HIV-negative patients. The proportion of poor treatment outcome attributable to rural residence (population attributable fraction, PAF) was 25.6%. The PAF for HIV infection was 11.9%. The effect of rural residence on poor treatment outcome among HIV-negative patients (aRR:4.07; 95%CI:3.15–5.25) was more than twice that among HIV-positive patients (aRR:1.99; 95%CI:1.49–2.64). CONCLUSION: Rural residents attending a large Nigerian TB clinic are at increased risk of having poor treatment outcomes, and this risk is amplified among those that are HIV-negative. Our findings indicate that rural coverage of HIV services may be better than TB services. These findings highlight the importance of expanding coverage of TB services to ensure prompt diagnosis and commencement of treatment, especially among rural-dwellers in resource-limited settings. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759183/ /pubmed/29310659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0714-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Adamu, Aishatu Lawal
Aliyu, Muktar H.
Galadanci, Najiba Aliyu
Musa, Baba Maiyaki
Lawan, Umar Muhammad
Bashir, Usman
Abubakar, Ibrahim
The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title_full The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title_fullStr The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title_short The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
title_sort impact of rural residence and hiv infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0714-8
work_keys_str_mv AT adamuaishatulawal theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT aliyumuktarh theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT galadancinajibaaliyu theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT musababamaiyaki theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT lawanumarmuhammad theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT bashirusman theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT abubakaribrahim theimpactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT adamuaishatulawal impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT aliyumuktarh impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT galadancinajibaaliyu impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT musababamaiyaki impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT lawanumarmuhammad impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT bashirusman impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis
AT abubakaribrahim impactofruralresidenceandhivinfectiononpoortuberculosistreatmentoutcomesinalargeurbanhospitalaretrospectivecohortanalysis