Cargando…

Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)

The second meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) was held 3–4 October 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. ICASR is an interdisciplinary group whose aim is to maximize the use of technology for conducting rapid, accurate, and efficient systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Annette M., Tsafnat, Guy, Gilbert, Stephen B., Thayer, Kristina A., Wolfe, Mary S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0667-4
_version_ 1783291147561467904
author O’Connor, Annette M.
Tsafnat, Guy
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Thayer, Kristina A.
Wolfe, Mary S.
author_facet O’Connor, Annette M.
Tsafnat, Guy
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Thayer, Kristina A.
Wolfe, Mary S.
author_sort O’Connor, Annette M.
collection PubMed
description The second meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) was held 3–4 October 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. ICASR is an interdisciplinary group whose aim is to maximize the use of technology for conducting rapid, accurate, and efficient systematic reviews of scientific evidence. Having automated tools for systematic review should enable more transparent and timely review, maximizing the potential for identifying and translating research findings to practical application. The meeting brought together multiple stakeholder groups including users of summarized research, methodologists who explore production processes and systematic review quality, and technologists such as software developers, statisticians, and vendors. This diversity of participants was intended to ensure effective communication with numerous stakeholders about progress toward automation of systematic reviews and stimulate discussion about potential solutions to identified challenges. The meeting highlighted challenges, both simple and complex, and raised awareness among participants about ongoing efforts by various stakeholders. An outcome of this forum was to identify several short-term projects that participants felt would advance the automation of tasks in the systematic review workflow including (1) fostering better understanding about available tools, (2) developing validated datasets for testing new tools, (3) determining a standard method to facilitate interoperability of tools such as through an application programming interface or API, and (4) establishing criteria to evaluate the quality of tools’ output. ICASR 2016 provided a beneficial forum to foster focused discussion about tool development and resources and reconfirm ICASR members’ commitment toward systematic reviews’ automation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57591842018-01-10 Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) O’Connor, Annette M. Tsafnat, Guy Gilbert, Stephen B. Thayer, Kristina A. Wolfe, Mary S. Syst Rev Commentary The second meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) was held 3–4 October 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. ICASR is an interdisciplinary group whose aim is to maximize the use of technology for conducting rapid, accurate, and efficient systematic reviews of scientific evidence. Having automated tools for systematic review should enable more transparent and timely review, maximizing the potential for identifying and translating research findings to practical application. The meeting brought together multiple stakeholder groups including users of summarized research, methodologists who explore production processes and systematic review quality, and technologists such as software developers, statisticians, and vendors. This diversity of participants was intended to ensure effective communication with numerous stakeholders about progress toward automation of systematic reviews and stimulate discussion about potential solutions to identified challenges. The meeting highlighted challenges, both simple and complex, and raised awareness among participants about ongoing efforts by various stakeholders. An outcome of this forum was to identify several short-term projects that participants felt would advance the automation of tasks in the systematic review workflow including (1) fostering better understanding about available tools, (2) developing validated datasets for testing new tools, (3) determining a standard method to facilitate interoperability of tools such as through an application programming interface or API, and (4) establishing criteria to evaluate the quality of tools’ output. ICASR 2016 provided a beneficial forum to foster focused discussion about tool development and resources and reconfirm ICASR members’ commitment toward systematic reviews’ automation. BioMed Central 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5759184/ /pubmed/29316980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0667-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
O’Connor, Annette M.
Tsafnat, Guy
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Thayer, Kristina A.
Wolfe, Mary S.
Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title_full Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title_fullStr Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title_full_unstemmed Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title_short Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)
title_sort moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of international collaboration for the automation of systematic reviews (icasr)
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0667-4
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorannettem movingtowardtheautomationofthesystematicreviewprocessasummaryofdiscussionsatthesecondmeetingofinternationalcollaborationfortheautomationofsystematicreviewsicasr
AT tsafnatguy movingtowardtheautomationofthesystematicreviewprocessasummaryofdiscussionsatthesecondmeetingofinternationalcollaborationfortheautomationofsystematicreviewsicasr
AT gilbertstephenb movingtowardtheautomationofthesystematicreviewprocessasummaryofdiscussionsatthesecondmeetingofinternationalcollaborationfortheautomationofsystematicreviewsicasr
AT thayerkristinaa movingtowardtheautomationofthesystematicreviewprocessasummaryofdiscussionsatthesecondmeetingofinternationalcollaborationfortheautomationofsystematicreviewsicasr
AT wolfemarys movingtowardtheautomationofthesystematicreviewprocessasummaryofdiscussionsatthesecondmeetingofinternationalcollaborationfortheautomationofsystematicreviewsicasr