Cargando…

Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives

BACKGROUND: Shifting care from the secondary to the primary system may present an opportunity to ensure that the increasing number of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) receive high-quality care while containing costs. However, shifting from secondary to primary care might seem radical to pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wildeboer, J. A., van de Ven, A. R. T., de Boer, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0688-z
_version_ 1783291150589755392
author Wildeboer, J. A.
van de Ven, A. R. T.
de Boer, D.
author_facet Wildeboer, J. A.
van de Ven, A. R. T.
de Boer, D.
author_sort Wildeboer, J. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shifting care from the secondary to the primary system may present an opportunity to ensure that the increasing number of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) receive high-quality care while containing costs. However, shifting from secondary to primary care might seem radical to patients. A qualitative insight into patients’ issues, preferences, expectations and needs may help arrange a smooth transition from secondary to primary care for CHF patients. The aim of this exploratory study is therefore to gain insights into the way CHF patients in secondary care perceive the possibility of substitution of CHF care from secondary to primary care. METHODS: In total, fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with CHF patients. Topics discussed during the interviews were the advantages and disadvantages, attitudes of patients, preferences regarding the substitution and trust in the GP and cardiologist. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The minority of the patients welcomed the idea of substitution. Against that, the majority of the patients had various concerns. This attitude was mainly influenced by two main themes, confidence and security and accessibility. Most patients had more confidence in secondary than in primary care because of the greater level of knowledge and more possibilities for examination in secondary care and because of good relationships and positive previous experiences in secondary care. Patients also indicated that the general practice is geographically more easily accessible than the hospital. CONCLUSION: Patients had various concerns regarding the substitution of care for chronic heart failure. Addressing these concerns by informing them appropriately may contribute to a smooth and patient-friendly substitution from secondary to primary care. The fears and needs of patients could also be taken into account by policymakers when optimising the way substitution is organised, or when substitution is introduced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-017-0688-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57591972018-01-10 Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives Wildeboer, J. A. van de Ven, A. R. T. de Boer, D. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Shifting care from the secondary to the primary system may present an opportunity to ensure that the increasing number of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) receive high-quality care while containing costs. However, shifting from secondary to primary care might seem radical to patients. A qualitative insight into patients’ issues, preferences, expectations and needs may help arrange a smooth transition from secondary to primary care for CHF patients. The aim of this exploratory study is therefore to gain insights into the way CHF patients in secondary care perceive the possibility of substitution of CHF care from secondary to primary care. METHODS: In total, fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with CHF patients. Topics discussed during the interviews were the advantages and disadvantages, attitudes of patients, preferences regarding the substitution and trust in the GP and cardiologist. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The minority of the patients welcomed the idea of substitution. Against that, the majority of the patients had various concerns. This attitude was mainly influenced by two main themes, confidence and security and accessibility. Most patients had more confidence in secondary than in primary care because of the greater level of knowledge and more possibilities for examination in secondary care and because of good relationships and positive previous experiences in secondary care. Patients also indicated that the general practice is geographically more easily accessible than the hospital. CONCLUSION: Patients had various concerns regarding the substitution of care for chronic heart failure. Addressing these concerns by informing them appropriately may contribute to a smooth and patient-friendly substitution from secondary to primary care. The fears and needs of patients could also be taken into account by policymakers when optimising the way substitution is organised, or when substitution is introduced. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-017-0688-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5759197/ /pubmed/29316896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0688-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wildeboer, J. A.
van de Ven, A. R. T.
de Boer, D.
Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title_full Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title_fullStr Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title_short Substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
title_sort substitution of care for chronic heart failure from the hospital to the general practice: patients’ perspectives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0688-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wildeboerja substitutionofcareforchronicheartfailurefromthehospitaltothegeneralpracticepatientsperspectives
AT vandevenart substitutionofcareforchronicheartfailurefromthehospitaltothegeneralpracticepatientsperspectives
AT deboerd substitutionofcareforchronicheartfailurefromthehospitaltothegeneralpracticepatientsperspectives