Cargando…

Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing

BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacConaill, Laura E., Burns, Robert T., Nag, Anwesha, Coleman, Haley A., Slevin, Michael K., Giorda, Kristina, Light, Madelyn, Lai, Kevin, Jarosz, Mirna, McNeill, Matthew S., Ducar, Matthew D., Meyerson, Matthew, Thorner, Aaron R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5
_version_ 1783291151522988032
author MacConaill, Laura E.
Burns, Robert T.
Nag, Anwesha
Coleman, Haley A.
Slevin, Michael K.
Giorda, Kristina
Light, Madelyn
Lai, Kevin
Jarosz, Mirna
McNeill, Matthew S.
Ducar, Matthew D.
Meyerson, Matthew
Thorner, Aaron R.
author_facet MacConaill, Laura E.
Burns, Robert T.
Nag, Anwesha
Coleman, Haley A.
Slevin, Michael K.
Giorda, Kristina
Light, Madelyn
Lai, Kevin
Jarosz, Mirna
McNeill, Matthew S.
Ducar, Matthew D.
Meyerson, Matthew
Thorner, Aaron R.
author_sort MacConaill, Laura E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. RESULTS: Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57592012018-01-10 Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing MacConaill, Laura E. Burns, Robert T. Nag, Anwesha Coleman, Haley A. Slevin, Michael K. Giorda, Kristina Light, Madelyn Lai, Kevin Jarosz, Mirna McNeill, Matthew S. Ducar, Matthew D. Meyerson, Matthew Thorner, Aaron R. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. RESULTS: Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759201/ /pubmed/29310587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
MacConaill, Laura E.
Burns, Robert T.
Nag, Anwesha
Coleman, Haley A.
Slevin, Michael K.
Giorda, Kristina
Light, Madelyn
Lai, Kevin
Jarosz, Mirna
McNeill, Matthew S.
Ducar, Matthew D.
Meyerson, Matthew
Thorner, Aaron R.
Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_full Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_fullStr Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_short Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
title_sort unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with umis effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5
work_keys_str_mv AT macconailllaurae uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT burnsrobertt uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT naganwesha uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT colemanhaleya uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT slevinmichaelk uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT giordakristina uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT lightmadelyn uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT laikevin uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT jaroszmirna uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT mcneillmatthews uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT ducarmatthewd uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT meyersonmatthew uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing
AT thorneraaronr uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing