Cargando…
Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing
BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5 |
_version_ | 1783291151522988032 |
---|---|
author | MacConaill, Laura E. Burns, Robert T. Nag, Anwesha Coleman, Haley A. Slevin, Michael K. Giorda, Kristina Light, Madelyn Lai, Kevin Jarosz, Mirna McNeill, Matthew S. Ducar, Matthew D. Meyerson, Matthew Thorner, Aaron R. |
author_facet | MacConaill, Laura E. Burns, Robert T. Nag, Anwesha Coleman, Haley A. Slevin, Michael K. Giorda, Kristina Light, Madelyn Lai, Kevin Jarosz, Mirna McNeill, Matthew S. Ducar, Matthew D. Meyerson, Matthew Thorner, Aaron R. |
author_sort | MacConaill, Laura E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. RESULTS: Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57592012018-01-10 Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing MacConaill, Laura E. Burns, Robert T. Nag, Anwesha Coleman, Haley A. Slevin, Michael K. Giorda, Kristina Light, Madelyn Lai, Kevin Jarosz, Mirna McNeill, Matthew S. Ducar, Matthew D. Meyerson, Matthew Thorner, Aaron R. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Sample index cross-talk can result in false positive calls when massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is used for sensitive applications such as low-frequency somatic variant discovery, ancient DNA investigations, microbial detection in human samples, or circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) variant detection. Therefore, the limit-of-detection of an MPS assay is directly related to the degree of index cross-talk. RESULTS: Cross-talk rates up to 0.29% were observed when using standard, combinatorial adapters, resulting in 110,180 (0.1% cross-talk rate) or 1,121,074 (0.29% cross-talk rate) misassigned reads per lane in non-patterned and patterned Illumina flow cells, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that using unique, dual-matched indexed adapters dramatically reduces index cross-talk to ≤1 misassigned reads per flow cell lane. While the current study was performed using dual-matched indices, using unique, dual-unrelated indices would also be an effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: For sensitive downstream analyses, the use of combinatorial indices for multiplexed hybrid capture and sequencing is inappropriate, as it results in an unacceptable number of misassigned reads. Cross-talk can be virtually eliminated using dual-matched indexed adapters. These results suggest that use of such adapters is critical to reduce false positive rates in assays that aim to identify low allele frequency events, and strongly indicate that dual-matched adapters be implemented for all sensitive MPS applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759201/ /pubmed/29310587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article MacConaill, Laura E. Burns, Robert T. Nag, Anwesha Coleman, Haley A. Slevin, Michael K. Giorda, Kristina Light, Madelyn Lai, Kevin Jarosz, Mirna McNeill, Matthew S. Ducar, Matthew D. Meyerson, Matthew Thorner, Aaron R. Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title | Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title_full | Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title_fullStr | Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title_short | Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
title_sort | unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with umis effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4428-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macconailllaurae uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT burnsrobertt uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT naganwesha uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT colemanhaleya uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT slevinmichaelk uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT giordakristina uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT lightmadelyn uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT laikevin uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT jaroszmirna uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT mcneillmatthews uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT ducarmatthewd uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT meyersonmatthew uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing AT thorneraaronr uniquedualindexedsequencingadapterswithumiseffectivelyeliminateindexcrosstalkandsignificantlyimprovesensitivityofmassivelyparallelsequencing |