Cargando…

Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding

BACKGROUND: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for breastfeeding conducted in areas with low breastfeeding rates in the UK reported a statistically significant increase in breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks. In this paper we report an analysis of interviews with women eligible fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Maxine, Whelan, Barbara, Relton, Clare, Thomas, Kate, Strong, Mark, Scott, Elaine, Renfrew, Mary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1651-7
_version_ 1783291159507894272
author Johnson, Maxine
Whelan, Barbara
Relton, Clare
Thomas, Kate
Strong, Mark
Scott, Elaine
Renfrew, Mary J.
author_facet Johnson, Maxine
Whelan, Barbara
Relton, Clare
Thomas, Kate
Strong, Mark
Scott, Elaine
Renfrew, Mary J.
author_sort Johnson, Maxine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for breastfeeding conducted in areas with low breastfeeding rates in the UK reported a statistically significant increase in breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks. In this paper we report an analysis of interviews with women eligible for the scheme, exploring their experiences and perceptions of the scheme and its impact on breastfeeding to support the interpretation of the results of the trial. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 35 women eligible for the scheme during the feasibility and trial stages. All interviews were recorded and verbatim transcripts analysed using a Framework Analysis approach. RESULTS: Women reported that their decisions about infant feeding were influenced by the behaviours and beliefs of their family and friends, socio-cultural norms and by health and practical considerations. They were generally positive about the scheme, and felt valued for the effort involved in breastfeeding. The vouchers were frequently described as a reward, a bonus and something to look forward to, and helping women keep going with their breastfeeding. They were often perceived as compensation for the difficulties women encountered during breastfeeding. The scheme was not thought to make a difference to mothers who were strongly against breastfeeding. However, women did believe the scheme would help normalise breastfeeding, influence those who were undecided and help women to keep going with breastfeeding and reach key milestones e.g. 6 weeks or 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The scheme was acceptable to women, who perceived it as rewarding and valuing them for breastfeeding. Women reported that the scheme could raise awareness of breastfeeding and encourage its normalisation. This provides a possible mechanism of action to explain the results of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 44898617, https://www.isrctn.com ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1651-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57592352018-01-10 Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding Johnson, Maxine Whelan, Barbara Relton, Clare Thomas, Kate Strong, Mark Scott, Elaine Renfrew, Mary J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for breastfeeding conducted in areas with low breastfeeding rates in the UK reported a statistically significant increase in breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks. In this paper we report an analysis of interviews with women eligible for the scheme, exploring their experiences and perceptions of the scheme and its impact on breastfeeding to support the interpretation of the results of the trial. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 35 women eligible for the scheme during the feasibility and trial stages. All interviews were recorded and verbatim transcripts analysed using a Framework Analysis approach. RESULTS: Women reported that their decisions about infant feeding were influenced by the behaviours and beliefs of their family and friends, socio-cultural norms and by health and practical considerations. They were generally positive about the scheme, and felt valued for the effort involved in breastfeeding. The vouchers were frequently described as a reward, a bonus and something to look forward to, and helping women keep going with their breastfeeding. They were often perceived as compensation for the difficulties women encountered during breastfeeding. The scheme was not thought to make a difference to mothers who were strongly against breastfeeding. However, women did believe the scheme would help normalise breastfeeding, influence those who were undecided and help women to keep going with breastfeeding and reach key milestones e.g. 6 weeks or 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The scheme was acceptable to women, who perceived it as rewarding and valuing them for breastfeeding. Women reported that the scheme could raise awareness of breastfeeding and encourage its normalisation. This provides a possible mechanism of action to explain the results of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 44898617, https://www.isrctn.com ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1651-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759235/ /pubmed/29310619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1651-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Maxine
Whelan, Barbara
Relton, Clare
Thomas, Kate
Strong, Mark
Scott, Elaine
Renfrew, Mary J.
Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title_full Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title_fullStr Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title_full_unstemmed Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title_short Valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
title_sort valuing breastfeeding: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1651-7
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmaxine valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT whelanbarbara valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT reltonclare valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT thomaskate valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT strongmark valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT scottelaine valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding
AT renfrewmaryj valuingbreastfeedingaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesofafinancialincentiveschemeforbreastfeeding