Cargando…

Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships

In line with the policy objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this commentary seeks to examine the extent to which provisions of international health research guidance promote capacity building and equitable partnerships in global health research. Our evaluation finds that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Claire Leonie, Shaw, David, Sprumont, Dominique, Sankoh, Osman, Tanner, Marcel, Elger, Bernice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0319-4
_version_ 1783291175223951360
author Ward, Claire Leonie
Shaw, David
Sprumont, Dominique
Sankoh, Osman
Tanner, Marcel
Elger, Bernice
author_facet Ward, Claire Leonie
Shaw, David
Sprumont, Dominique
Sankoh, Osman
Tanner, Marcel
Elger, Bernice
author_sort Ward, Claire Leonie
collection PubMed
description In line with the policy objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this commentary seeks to examine the extent to which provisions of international health research guidance promote capacity building and equitable partnerships in global health research. Our evaluation finds that governance of collaborative research partnerships, and in particular capacity building, in resource-constrained settings is limited but has improved with the implementation guidance of the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans by The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2016). However, more clarity is needed in national legislation, industry and ethics guidelines, and regulatory provisions to address the structural inequities and power imbalances inherent in international health research partnerships. Most notably, ethical partnership governance is not supported by the principal industry ethics guidelines – the International Conference on Harmonization Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceutical for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). Given the strategic value of ICH-GCP guidelines in defining the role and responsibility of global health research partners, we conclude that such governance should stipulate the minimal requirements for creating an equitable environment of inclusion, mutual learning, transparency and accountability. Procedurally, this can be supported by i) shared research agenda setting with local leadership, ii) capacity assessments, and iii) construction of a memorandum of understanding (MoU). Moreover, the requirement of capacity building needs to be coordinated amongst partners to support good collaborative practice and deliver on the public health goals of the research enterprise; improving local conditions of health and reducing global health inequality. In this respect, and in order to develop consistency between sources of research governance, ICH-GCP should reference CIOMS ethical guidelines as the established standard for collaborative partnership. Moreover, greater commitment and support should be given to co-ordinate, strengthen and enforce local laws requiring equitable research partnerships and health system strengthening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57593022018-01-10 Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships Ward, Claire Leonie Shaw, David Sprumont, Dominique Sankoh, Osman Tanner, Marcel Elger, Bernice Global Health Commentary In line with the policy objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this commentary seeks to examine the extent to which provisions of international health research guidance promote capacity building and equitable partnerships in global health research. Our evaluation finds that governance of collaborative research partnerships, and in particular capacity building, in resource-constrained settings is limited but has improved with the implementation guidance of the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans by The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2016). However, more clarity is needed in national legislation, industry and ethics guidelines, and regulatory provisions to address the structural inequities and power imbalances inherent in international health research partnerships. Most notably, ethical partnership governance is not supported by the principal industry ethics guidelines – the International Conference on Harmonization Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceutical for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). Given the strategic value of ICH-GCP guidelines in defining the role and responsibility of global health research partners, we conclude that such governance should stipulate the minimal requirements for creating an equitable environment of inclusion, mutual learning, transparency and accountability. Procedurally, this can be supported by i) shared research agenda setting with local leadership, ii) capacity assessments, and iii) construction of a memorandum of understanding (MoU). Moreover, the requirement of capacity building needs to be coordinated amongst partners to support good collaborative practice and deliver on the public health goals of the research enterprise; improving local conditions of health and reducing global health inequality. In this respect, and in order to develop consistency between sources of research governance, ICH-GCP should reference CIOMS ethical guidelines as the established standard for collaborative partnership. Moreover, greater commitment and support should be given to co-ordinate, strengthen and enforce local laws requiring equitable research partnerships and health system strengthening. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759302/ /pubmed/29310698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0319-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Ward, Claire Leonie
Shaw, David
Sprumont, Dominique
Sankoh, Osman
Tanner, Marcel
Elger, Bernice
Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title_full Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title_fullStr Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title_full_unstemmed Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title_short Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
title_sort good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0319-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wardclaireleonie goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships
AT shawdavid goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships
AT sprumontdominique goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships
AT sankohosman goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships
AT tannermarcel goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships
AT elgerbernice goodcollaborativepracticereformingcapacitybuildinggovernanceofinternationalhealthresearchpartnerships