Cargando…
Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Causative factors may be different for the very first onset of symptoms of the ‘disease’ of low back pain (LBP) than for ensuing episodes that occur after a pain-free period. This differentiation hinges on a life-time absence of low back pain at first onset and short-term absence for fur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-017-0172-9 |
_version_ | 1783291176154038272 |
---|---|
author | Ardakani, Emad M. Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Walker, Bruce F. |
author_facet | Ardakani, Emad M. Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Walker, Bruce F. |
author_sort | Ardakani, Emad M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Causative factors may be different for the very first onset of symptoms of the ‘disease’ of low back pain (LBP) than for ensuing episodes that occur after a pain-free period. This differentiation hinges on a life-time absence of low back pain at first onset and short-term absence for further episodes. In this systematic review, we explored whether researchers make these distinctions when investigating the causality of LBP. METHODS: A literature search of PUBMED, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases was performed from January 2010 until September 2016 using the search terms ‘low back pain’ or ‘back pain’ and ‘risk factor’ or ‘caus*’ or ‘predict*’ or ‘onset’ or ‘first-time’ or ‘inception’ or ‘incidence’. Two reviewers extracted information on study design, types of episodes of back pain to distinguish the disease of LBP and recurring episodes, and also to determine the definitions of disease- or pain-free periods. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles purporting to study causes of LBP were included. Upon scrutiny, 31 of the 33 articles were unclear as to what type of causality they were studying, that of the ‘disease’ or the episode, or a mere association with LBP. Only 9 studies used a prospective study design. Five studies appeared to investigate the onset of the disease of LBP, however, only one study truly captured the first incidence of LBP, which was the result of sports injury. Six appeared to study episodes but only one clearly related to the concept of episodes. Therefore, among those 11 studies, nine included both first-time LBP and episodes of LBP. Consequently, 22 studies related to the prevalence of LBP, as they probably included a mixture of first-time, recurring and ongoing episodes without distinction. CONCLUSION: Recent literature concerning the causality of LBP does not differentiate between the ‘disease’ of LBP and its recurring episodes mainly due to a lack of a clear definition of absence of LBP at baseline. Therefore, current research is not capable of providing a valid answer on this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57593062018-01-10 Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review Ardakani, Emad M. Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Walker, Bruce F. Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Causative factors may be different for the very first onset of symptoms of the ‘disease’ of low back pain (LBP) than for ensuing episodes that occur after a pain-free period. This differentiation hinges on a life-time absence of low back pain at first onset and short-term absence for further episodes. In this systematic review, we explored whether researchers make these distinctions when investigating the causality of LBP. METHODS: A literature search of PUBMED, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases was performed from January 2010 until September 2016 using the search terms ‘low back pain’ or ‘back pain’ and ‘risk factor’ or ‘caus*’ or ‘predict*’ or ‘onset’ or ‘first-time’ or ‘inception’ or ‘incidence’. Two reviewers extracted information on study design, types of episodes of back pain to distinguish the disease of LBP and recurring episodes, and also to determine the definitions of disease- or pain-free periods. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles purporting to study causes of LBP were included. Upon scrutiny, 31 of the 33 articles were unclear as to what type of causality they were studying, that of the ‘disease’ or the episode, or a mere association with LBP. Only 9 studies used a prospective study design. Five studies appeared to investigate the onset of the disease of LBP, however, only one study truly captured the first incidence of LBP, which was the result of sports injury. Six appeared to study episodes but only one clearly related to the concept of episodes. Therefore, among those 11 studies, nine included both first-time LBP and episodes of LBP. Consequently, 22 studies related to the prevalence of LBP, as they probably included a mixture of first-time, recurring and ongoing episodes without distinction. CONCLUSION: Recent literature concerning the causality of LBP does not differentiate between the ‘disease’ of LBP and its recurring episodes mainly due to a lack of a clear definition of absence of LBP at baseline. Therefore, current research is not capable of providing a valid answer on this topic. BioMed Central 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5759306/ /pubmed/29321845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-017-0172-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ardakani, Emad M. Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Walker, Bruce F. Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title | Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title_full | Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title_short | Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
title_sort | failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-017-0172-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ardakaniemadm failuretodefinelowbackpainasadiseaseoranepisoderendersresearchoncausalityunsuitableresultsofasystematicreview AT leboeufydecharlotte failuretodefinelowbackpainasadiseaseoranepisoderendersresearchoncausalityunsuitableresultsofasystematicreview AT walkerbrucef failuretodefinelowbackpainasadiseaseoranepisoderendersresearchoncausalityunsuitableresultsofasystematicreview |