Cargando…

185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azimi, Ali, Sanatjoo, Azam, Dayani, Mohammad Hossein, Fattahi, Rahmatollah, Nowkarizi, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759386/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185
_version_ 1783291186505580544
author Azimi, Ali
Sanatjoo, Azam
Dayani, Mohammad Hossein
Fattahi, Rahmatollah
Nowkarizi, Mohsen
author_facet Azimi, Ali
Sanatjoo, Azam
Dayani, Mohammad Hossein
Fattahi, Rahmatollah
Nowkarizi, Mohsen
author_sort Azimi, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, while KT tools are designed to expedite consumption of newly carried-out research, conscientious use of conducted research is hinted at EBM studies. Thus, the primary goal of this study is re-examining KT and EBM foundations to make a clear understanding of how these two apparently conflicting areas in medicine can join forces to improve health practice. METHODS: This is a historical research which uses KT and EBM related studies and documents to find about foundations and strategies taken in KT and EBM. Thus, a comprehensive review of related literature was conducted and all possible approaches identified. Also a 3 round Delphi method was conducted and results were discussed categorically. RESULTS: Very similar to the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, there is a pyramid of research types based on studies' contribution to accumulation of evidence so that systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies are on top and basic research studies at the bottom. Therefore, moving from bottom to top to reach to a reasonable body of evidence is very time consuming and this fact contradicts with KT purposes. However, we found some solutions to overcome to this paradoxical problem, some of them including: online publishing with short intervals between issues (weekly, semiweekly or monthly) or optimally online continuous updated publishing, and more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analysis so that they could be performed for shorter periods of time (e.g. annual or semi-annual). CONCLUSION: A successful health system would be reachable through considering both KT and EBM criteria. While KT mainly focuses on the developing best knowledge targeting the right audience in a short possible time, EBM focuses on the quality of knowledge directed to clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57593862018-02-12 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT Azimi, Ali Sanatjoo, Azam Dayani, Mohammad Hossein Fattahi, Rahmatollah Nowkarizi, Mohsen BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, while KT tools are designed to expedite consumption of newly carried-out research, conscientious use of conducted research is hinted at EBM studies. Thus, the primary goal of this study is re-examining KT and EBM foundations to make a clear understanding of how these two apparently conflicting areas in medicine can join forces to improve health practice. METHODS: This is a historical research which uses KT and EBM related studies and documents to find about foundations and strategies taken in KT and EBM. Thus, a comprehensive review of related literature was conducted and all possible approaches identified. Also a 3 round Delphi method was conducted and results were discussed categorically. RESULTS: Very similar to the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, there is a pyramid of research types based on studies' contribution to accumulation of evidence so that systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies are on top and basic research studies at the bottom. Therefore, moving from bottom to top to reach to a reasonable body of evidence is very time consuming and this fact contradicts with KT purposes. However, we found some solutions to overcome to this paradoxical problem, some of them including: online publishing with short intervals between issues (weekly, semiweekly or monthly) or optimally online continuous updated publishing, and more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analysis so that they could be performed for shorter periods of time (e.g. annual or semi-annual). CONCLUSION: A successful health system would be reachable through considering both KT and EBM criteria. While KT mainly focuses on the developing best knowledge targeting the right audience in a short possible time, EBM focuses on the quality of knowledge directed to clinical decisions. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759386/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
Azimi, Ali
Sanatjoo, Azam
Dayani, Mohammad Hossein
Fattahi, Rahmatollah
Nowkarizi, Mohsen
185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title_full 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title_fullStr 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title_full_unstemmed 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title_short 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
title_sort 185: knowledge translation (kt) and evidence-based medicine (ebm): a practical conflict
topic Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759386/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185
work_keys_str_mv AT azimiali 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict
AT sanatjooazam 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict
AT dayanimohammadhossein 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict
AT fattahirahmatollah 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict
AT nowkarizimohsen 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict