Cargando…
185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to gui...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759386/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185 |
_version_ | 1783291186505580544 |
---|---|
author | Azimi, Ali Sanatjoo, Azam Dayani, Mohammad Hossein Fattahi, Rahmatollah Nowkarizi, Mohsen |
author_facet | Azimi, Ali Sanatjoo, Azam Dayani, Mohammad Hossein Fattahi, Rahmatollah Nowkarizi, Mohsen |
author_sort | Azimi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, while KT tools are designed to expedite consumption of newly carried-out research, conscientious use of conducted research is hinted at EBM studies. Thus, the primary goal of this study is re-examining KT and EBM foundations to make a clear understanding of how these two apparently conflicting areas in medicine can join forces to improve health practice. METHODS: This is a historical research which uses KT and EBM related studies and documents to find about foundations and strategies taken in KT and EBM. Thus, a comprehensive review of related literature was conducted and all possible approaches identified. Also a 3 round Delphi method was conducted and results were discussed categorically. RESULTS: Very similar to the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, there is a pyramid of research types based on studies' contribution to accumulation of evidence so that systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies are on top and basic research studies at the bottom. Therefore, moving from bottom to top to reach to a reasonable body of evidence is very time consuming and this fact contradicts with KT purposes. However, we found some solutions to overcome to this paradoxical problem, some of them including: online publishing with short intervals between issues (weekly, semiweekly or monthly) or optimally online continuous updated publishing, and more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analysis so that they could be performed for shorter periods of time (e.g. annual or semi-annual). CONCLUSION: A successful health system would be reachable through considering both KT and EBM criteria. While KT mainly focuses on the developing best knowledge targeting the right audience in a short possible time, EBM focuses on the quality of knowledge directed to clinical decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57593862018-02-12 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT Azimi, Ali Sanatjoo, Azam Dayani, Mohammad Hossein Fattahi, Rahmatollah Nowkarizi, Mohsen BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Knowledge translation (KT) tries to bridge the gap between knowledge production and consumption by targeting the knowledge users and shortening the period of conveying research results to practice. Evidence based medicine (EBM) is the righteous use of accumulated evidence to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, while KT tools are designed to expedite consumption of newly carried-out research, conscientious use of conducted research is hinted at EBM studies. Thus, the primary goal of this study is re-examining KT and EBM foundations to make a clear understanding of how these two apparently conflicting areas in medicine can join forces to improve health practice. METHODS: This is a historical research which uses KT and EBM related studies and documents to find about foundations and strategies taken in KT and EBM. Thus, a comprehensive review of related literature was conducted and all possible approaches identified. Also a 3 round Delphi method was conducted and results were discussed categorically. RESULTS: Very similar to the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, there is a pyramid of research types based on studies' contribution to accumulation of evidence so that systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies are on top and basic research studies at the bottom. Therefore, moving from bottom to top to reach to a reasonable body of evidence is very time consuming and this fact contradicts with KT purposes. However, we found some solutions to overcome to this paradoxical problem, some of them including: online publishing with short intervals between issues (weekly, semiweekly or monthly) or optimally online continuous updated publishing, and more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analysis so that they could be performed for shorter periods of time (e.g. annual or semi-annual). CONCLUSION: A successful health system would be reachable through considering both KT and EBM criteria. While KT mainly focuses on the developing best knowledge targeting the right audience in a short possible time, EBM focuses on the quality of knowledge directed to clinical decisions. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759386/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira Azimi, Ali Sanatjoo, Azam Dayani, Mohammad Hossein Fattahi, Rahmatollah Nowkarizi, Mohsen 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title | 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title_full | 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title_fullStr | 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title_full_unstemmed | 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title_short | 185: KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION (KT) AND EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (EBM): A PRACTICAL CONFLICT |
title_sort | 185: knowledge translation (kt) and evidence-based medicine (ebm): a practical conflict |
topic | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759386/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azimiali 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict AT sanatjooazam 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict AT dayanimohammadhossein 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict AT fattahirahmatollah 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict AT nowkarizimohsen 185knowledgetranslationktandevidencebasedmedicineebmapracticalconflict |