Cargando…
157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is all accepted that high-quality evidence is essential for clinical decision making. As Haynes “6S pyramid”, systems including decision support systems are at the top of this pyramid as the highest level of evidence. There are numerous systematic reviews which have assessed...
Autores principales: | Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, Fathifar, Zahra, Hasankandi, Hossein Saeedi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759537/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.157 |
Ejemplares similares
-
158: ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF SEARCH STRATEGIES IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
por: Fathifar, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
176: EVIDENCE-BASED AND EFFECTIVE RESEARCH SKILLS OF IRANIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS
por: Mostafaei, Helia, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
120: THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FRACTIONAL CO2 LASER IN ACNE SCARS AND SKIN REJUVENATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND ECONOMIC EVALUATION
por: Yaaghoobian, Barmak, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
13: AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST ACCORDING TO PRACTICE-BASED EVIDENCE
por: Ghadami, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
153: A META-ANALYSIS ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF PUBLISHED ARTICLES BASED ON THE CHECKLIST QUOROM
por: Ghojazadeh, Morteza, et al.
Publicado: (2017)