Cargando…
80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because of growing costs in health system, resource allocation has vital role in assignment of existing resources to health technologies in recent years. Therefore, health technology assessment (HTA) is a good tool for allocating the resources based on evidence in health sector....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759546/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.80 |
_version_ | 1783291224350785536 |
---|---|
author | Arab-Zozani, Morteza Jalilian, Habib Oskouei, Mina Mahami Dehghanian, Mohammad Aghbalaghi, Zoleikha Asadi |
author_facet | Arab-Zozani, Morteza Jalilian, Habib Oskouei, Mina Mahami Dehghanian, Mohammad Aghbalaghi, Zoleikha Asadi |
author_sort | Arab-Zozani, Morteza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because of growing costs in health system, resource allocation has vital role in assignment of existing resources to health technologies in recent years. Therefore, health technology assessment (HTA) is a good tool for allocating the resources based on evidence in health sector. In line with evidence-based decision making, HTA program conducted in Iran since 2007 and in this article explores the main stakeholders in implementing the HTA program. METHODS: At the first step the researchers searched the related articles, policy documents and secondary sources to identify the range of the stakeholders in this field. Then, semi-structured interview were conducted with all stakeholder from all categories and interpret according to the principles of the qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Stakeholder analysis has identified 10 main category of stakeholder (WHO, MOHME, The National Institute for Health Research, Graduates and researchers, Universities and research institutes, Department of Medical Equipment, Food and Drug Administration, Insurance agencies, Manufacturing and importer companies' of medicines and medical equipment, The Parliament Health Commission) in relation to HTA program. The MOHME and NIHR along with graduates and researchers who were educated abroad were the most powerful and supportive actors that had an important role in implementing this program. We found that Department of Medical Equipment and medicines and medical equipment companies were strongly opposition in implementing the HTA program. The presence of abroad graduates in the country at the time of implementation of the program was the most important factor in the successful implementation of this program. CONCLUSION: Conducting this program showed that the dialogue with opposition groups can enhance the possibility of the successful implementation of a program. Implementing these strategies at a country level will confidently decrease the knowledge gap between research and policy and increase health system outcomes in terms of resource allocation and EBM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57595462018-02-12 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS Arab-Zozani, Morteza Jalilian, Habib Oskouei, Mina Mahami Dehghanian, Mohammad Aghbalaghi, Zoleikha Asadi BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Because of growing costs in health system, resource allocation has vital role in assignment of existing resources to health technologies in recent years. Therefore, health technology assessment (HTA) is a good tool for allocating the resources based on evidence in health sector. In line with evidence-based decision making, HTA program conducted in Iran since 2007 and in this article explores the main stakeholders in implementing the HTA program. METHODS: At the first step the researchers searched the related articles, policy documents and secondary sources to identify the range of the stakeholders in this field. Then, semi-structured interview were conducted with all stakeholder from all categories and interpret according to the principles of the qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Stakeholder analysis has identified 10 main category of stakeholder (WHO, MOHME, The National Institute for Health Research, Graduates and researchers, Universities and research institutes, Department of Medical Equipment, Food and Drug Administration, Insurance agencies, Manufacturing and importer companies' of medicines and medical equipment, The Parliament Health Commission) in relation to HTA program. The MOHME and NIHR along with graduates and researchers who were educated abroad were the most powerful and supportive actors that had an important role in implementing this program. We found that Department of Medical Equipment and medicines and medical equipment companies were strongly opposition in implementing the HTA program. The presence of abroad graduates in the country at the time of implementation of the program was the most important factor in the successful implementation of this program. CONCLUSION: Conducting this program showed that the dialogue with opposition groups can enhance the possibility of the successful implementation of a program. Implementing these strategies at a country level will confidently decrease the knowledge gap between research and policy and increase health system outcomes in terms of resource allocation and EBM. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759546/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.80 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira Arab-Zozani, Morteza Jalilian, Habib Oskouei, Mina Mahami Dehghanian, Mohammad Aghbalaghi, Zoleikha Asadi 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title | 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title_full | 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr | 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed | 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title_short | 80: IMPLEMENTING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRAN: A STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS |
title_sort | 80: implementing health technology assessment in iran: a stakeholder analysis |
topic | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759546/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.80 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arabzozanimorteza 80implementinghealthtechnologyassessmentiniranastakeholderanalysis AT jalilianhabib 80implementinghealthtechnologyassessmentiniranastakeholderanalysis AT oskoueiminamahami 80implementinghealthtechnologyassessmentiniranastakeholderanalysis AT dehghanianmohammad 80implementinghealthtechnologyassessmentiniranastakeholderanalysis AT aghbalaghizoleikhaasadi 80implementinghealthtechnologyassessmentiniranastakeholderanalysis |