Cargando…
58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-stress test (NST) is known as one of the most common assessments for evaluation of fetus wellbeing. Since the prevalence of its false positive resultsishigh and majority of fetuses with non-reactive results are not at risk, it is important to find out effective approaches to...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.58 |
_version_ | 1783291226899873792 |
---|---|
author | Raouf, Shiva |
author_facet | Raouf, Shiva |
author_sort | Raouf, Shiva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-stress test (NST) is known as one of the most common assessments for evaluation of fetus wellbeing. Since the prevalence of its false positive resultsishigh and majority of fetuses with non-reactive results are not at risk, it is important to find out effective approaches to identify such results to avoid unnecessary interventions. So this survey was conducted with the aim of comparing the effects of acoustic stimulation with feeding mothers stimulation on non-reactive NST results. METHODS: This study performed on 104 healthy pregnant women with non-reactive NST results and gestational ages between 32 and 42 weeks in Tabriz Alzahra hospital. Subjects were divided into two groups for acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation. Halfan hour later NST repeated for participants of each group in the same environmental condition and again the results evaluated. RESULTS: According to our findings, 75% of subjects with non-reactive NST results changed to reactive after acoustic stimulation group. However, 80% of participants with non-reactive NST results changed into reactive after feeding Stimulation. No significant differences found while comparing test results. CONCLUSION: Both stimulating approaches were effective in the identification of false positive NSTs and might be useful in preventing the unnecessary interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57595572018-02-12 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST Raouf, Shiva BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-stress test (NST) is known as one of the most common assessments for evaluation of fetus wellbeing. Since the prevalence of its false positive resultsishigh and majority of fetuses with non-reactive results are not at risk, it is important to find out effective approaches to identify such results to avoid unnecessary interventions. So this survey was conducted with the aim of comparing the effects of acoustic stimulation with feeding mothers stimulation on non-reactive NST results. METHODS: This study performed on 104 healthy pregnant women with non-reactive NST results and gestational ages between 32 and 42 weeks in Tabriz Alzahra hospital. Subjects were divided into two groups for acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation. Halfan hour later NST repeated for participants of each group in the same environmental condition and again the results evaluated. RESULTS: According to our findings, 75% of subjects with non-reactive NST results changed to reactive after acoustic stimulation group. However, 80% of participants with non-reactive NST results changed into reactive after feeding Stimulation. No significant differences found while comparing test results. CONCLUSION: Both stimulating approaches were effective in the identification of false positive NSTs and might be useful in preventing the unnecessary interventions. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.58 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira Raouf, Shiva 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title | 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title_full | 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title_fullStr | 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title_full_unstemmed | 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title_short | 58: EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC STIMULATION AND FEEDING MOTHER STIMULATION ON NON-REACTIVE NON-STRESS TEST |
title_sort | 58: evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test |
topic | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raoufshiva 58evaluationoftheeffectsofacousticstimulationandfeedingmotherstimulationonnonreactivenonstresstest |