Cargando…
169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to acquire the best evidence efficiently is important for busy healthcare professionals who have to make decision within a limited time. However, the current available assessment tools in evidence-based medicine (EBM), e.g. Berlin questionnaire and Fresno test, were...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.169 |
_version_ | 1783291231031263232 |
---|---|
author | Chi, Ching-Chi Tsai, Yu-Shiun Fang, Tien-Pei |
author_facet | Chi, Ching-Chi Tsai, Yu-Shiun Fang, Tien-Pei |
author_sort | Chi, Ching-Chi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to acquire the best evidence efficiently is important for busy healthcare professionals who have to make decision within a limited time. However, the current available assessment tools in evidence-based medicine (EBM), e.g. Berlin questionnaire and Fresno test, were not designed for examining evidence-searching capability. The objective of this study was to develop a scale for measuring evidence-searching skills. METHODS: We use 2-round modified Delphi technique and organised a workforce of 7 experts who provided comments on a draft 33-item scale and rated each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale. All items rated less than 3 by any expert were removed. The items were modified or merged after authors' discussion considering experts' comments. When all items were rated ≥3 by all experts with an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤1, a consensus was achieved. In a pilot test, the searching capability of two examinees was assessed by two raters and re-assessed two weeks later for reliability. In a further pilot test, the searching capability of another eight examinees was assessed by two raters and the reliability of the scale was examined. RESULTS: All 7 experts completed the two rounds. In Round 1, 33 items were removed and 11 items were merged into 4 items, leaving 17 items remained in the scale. In Round 2, 17 items were removed. The final consensus scale consisted of 15 items, all rated 4 or 5 with a mean of 4.79 and an IQR of 1 or less. The full details of the scale will be presented. In the pilot tests, the inter-rater correlation was 0.911 (95% confidence interval 0.821–0.956), while the intra-rater correlation coefficient was 1. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.903. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to develop a scale for measuring evidence-searching skills. The scale fills in the gap in objective assessment of knowledge-acquiring ability, and may be used in improving the training of evidence-searching skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57595752018-02-12 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY Chi, Ching-Chi Tsai, Yu-Shiun Fang, Tien-Pei BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ability to acquire the best evidence efficiently is important for busy healthcare professionals who have to make decision within a limited time. However, the current available assessment tools in evidence-based medicine (EBM), e.g. Berlin questionnaire and Fresno test, were not designed for examining evidence-searching capability. The objective of this study was to develop a scale for measuring evidence-searching skills. METHODS: We use 2-round modified Delphi technique and organised a workforce of 7 experts who provided comments on a draft 33-item scale and rated each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale. All items rated less than 3 by any expert were removed. The items were modified or merged after authors' discussion considering experts' comments. When all items were rated ≥3 by all experts with an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤1, a consensus was achieved. In a pilot test, the searching capability of two examinees was assessed by two raters and re-assessed two weeks later for reliability. In a further pilot test, the searching capability of another eight examinees was assessed by two raters and the reliability of the scale was examined. RESULTS: All 7 experts completed the two rounds. In Round 1, 33 items were removed and 11 items were merged into 4 items, leaving 17 items remained in the scale. In Round 2, 17 items were removed. The final consensus scale consisted of 15 items, all rated 4 or 5 with a mean of 4.79 and an IQR of 1 or less. The full details of the scale will be presented. In the pilot tests, the inter-rater correlation was 0.911 (95% confidence interval 0.821–0.956), while the intra-rater correlation coefficient was 1. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.903. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to develop a scale for measuring evidence-searching skills. The scale fills in the gap in objective assessment of knowledge-acquiring ability, and may be used in improving the training of evidence-searching skills. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.169 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira Chi, Ching-Chi Tsai, Yu-Shiun Fang, Tien-Pei 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title | 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title_full | 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title_fullStr | 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title_full_unstemmed | 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title_short | 169: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR MEASURING EVIDENCE-SEARCHING CAPABILITY: A MODIFIED DELPHI STUDY |
title_sort | 169: development of a scale for measuring evidence-searching capability: a modified delphi study |
topic | Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chichingchi 169developmentofascaleformeasuringevidencesearchingcapabilityamodifieddelphistudy AT tsaiyushiun 169developmentofascaleformeasuringevidencesearchingcapabilityamodifieddelphistudy AT fangtienpei 169developmentofascaleformeasuringevidencesearchingcapabilityamodifieddelphistudy |