Cargando…

015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES

This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues arising from two co-produced mental health research projects. It is a joint presentation by a practitioner researcher and a service user researcher, both of whom are leading on co-produced studies. The presentation explores issues relating to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carr, S, Lambert, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759577/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.33
_version_ 1783291231488442368
author Carr, S
Lambert, N
author_facet Carr, S
Lambert, N
author_sort Carr, S
collection PubMed
description This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues arising from two co-produced mental health research projects. It is a joint presentation by a practitioner researcher and a service user researcher, both of whom are leading on co-produced studies. The presentation explores issues relating to the integration of service user experiential knowledge into applied mental health research and the development of inclusive research methodologies, highlighting the inherent challenges for traditional health research methods and epistemologies. Nicky Lambert draws on her experiences of co-producing an experiential evidence base with and for women with mental and physical issues as part of her PhD research. She discusses the challenges of using unconventional methods in the engagement of marginalised groups in mental health research and her learning from working with ‘experts by experience’ as research collaborators. Sarah Carr draws on her experiences of being the principal investigator on a National Institute for Health Research School for Social Care Research funded user-led, co-produced study exploring mental health service user perspectives on targeted violence and hostility in the context of adult safeguarding. She discusses the influence and importance of methodologies and ethical approaches from mental health service user and survivor research in the project. They combine their experiences to offer good practice guidelines and suggest helpful resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57595772018-01-12 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES Carr, S Lambert, N BMJ Open UCL QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM 2017 This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues arising from two co-produced mental health research projects. It is a joint presentation by a practitioner researcher and a service user researcher, both of whom are leading on co-produced studies. The presentation explores issues relating to the integration of service user experiential knowledge into applied mental health research and the development of inclusive research methodologies, highlighting the inherent challenges for traditional health research methods and epistemologies. Nicky Lambert draws on her experiences of co-producing an experiential evidence base with and for women with mental and physical issues as part of her PhD research. She discusses the challenges of using unconventional methods in the engagement of marginalised groups in mental health research and her learning from working with ‘experts by experience’ as research collaborators. Sarah Carr draws on her experiences of being the principal investigator on a National Institute for Health Research School for Social Care Research funded user-led, co-produced study exploring mental health service user perspectives on targeted violence and hostility in the context of adult safeguarding. She discusses the influence and importance of methodologies and ethical approaches from mental health service user and survivor research in the project. They combine their experiences to offer good practice guidelines and suggest helpful resources. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5759577/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.33 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle UCL QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM 2017
Carr, S
Lambert, N
015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title_full 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title_fullStr 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title_full_unstemmed 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title_short 015 PP: WORKING CREATIVELY TO CO-PRODUCE QUALITATIVE MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: REFLECTIONS FROM TWO STUDIES
title_sort 015 pp: working creatively to co-produce qualitative mental health research: reflections from two studies
topic UCL QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759577/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.33
work_keys_str_mv AT carrs 015ppworkingcreativelytocoproducequalitativementalhealthresearchreflectionsfromtwostudies
AT lambertn 015ppworkingcreativelytocoproducequalitativementalhealthresearchreflectionsfromtwostudies