Cargando…

36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endo tracheal suctioning is a common neonatal intensive care procedure that is performed to clear trachea bronchial airways of secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube in intubated infants, which may lead to complications. Two systems are available to perform ES:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janani, Raheleh, Jannatdoost, Abdollah, Seyedrasuli, Alehe, Valizadeh, Leila, Sarbakhsh, Parvin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759584/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.36
_version_ 1783291233098006528
author Janani, Raheleh
Jannatdoost, Abdollah
Seyedrasuli, Alehe
Valizadeh, Leila
Sarbakhsh, Parvin
author_facet Janani, Raheleh
Jannatdoost, Abdollah
Seyedrasuli, Alehe
Valizadeh, Leila
Sarbakhsh, Parvin
author_sort Janani, Raheleh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endo tracheal suctioning is a common neonatal intensive care procedure that is performed to clear trachea bronchial airways of secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube in intubated infants, which may lead to complications. Two systems are available to perform ES: open suction system and closed suction system. Since bacterial airway colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and septicemia are important issues in neonatal care, recent study aims to compare side effects in two methods of endotracheal suctioning (open and closed) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation. METHODS: In current clinical trial study, 90 preterm infants of (27–34 weeks of GA) hospitalized in NICUs of Alzahra and Taleghani Teaching hospitals, (2014), elected and randomly assigned to two groups. One group was suctioned by open suctioning method and the other by closed suctioning method. However frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization were investigated and compared. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (ver. 21) and descriptive and analytic statistical methods such as x2 and independent T test analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization. But all side effects and mortality rate were higher in open suction. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates that, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning, side effects and duration of hospitalization. Considering clinical significance with regard to Evidenc-Based Clinical Decision Making, it is recommended that a comprehensive study over a greater population of premature infants should be carried out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57595842018-02-12 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION Janani, Raheleh Jannatdoost, Abdollah Seyedrasuli, Alehe Valizadeh, Leila Sarbakhsh, Parvin BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endo tracheal suctioning is a common neonatal intensive care procedure that is performed to clear trachea bronchial airways of secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube in intubated infants, which may lead to complications. Two systems are available to perform ES: open suction system and closed suction system. Since bacterial airway colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and septicemia are important issues in neonatal care, recent study aims to compare side effects in two methods of endotracheal suctioning (open and closed) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation. METHODS: In current clinical trial study, 90 preterm infants of (27–34 weeks of GA) hospitalized in NICUs of Alzahra and Taleghani Teaching hospitals, (2014), elected and randomly assigned to two groups. One group was suctioned by open suctioning method and the other by closed suctioning method. However frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization were investigated and compared. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (ver. 21) and descriptive and analytic statistical methods such as x2 and independent T test analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization. But all side effects and mortality rate were higher in open suction. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates that, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning, side effects and duration of hospitalization. Considering clinical significance with regard to Evidenc-Based Clinical Decision Making, it is recommended that a comprehensive study over a greater population of premature infants should be carried out. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759584/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.36 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
Janani, Raheleh
Jannatdoost, Abdollah
Seyedrasuli, Alehe
Valizadeh, Leila
Sarbakhsh, Parvin
36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title_full 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title_fullStr 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title_full_unstemmed 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title_short 36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
title_sort 36: comparison of side effects in two methods of endotracheal suctioning (open and closed) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation
topic Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759584/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.36
work_keys_str_mv AT jananiraheleh 36comparisonofsideeffectsintwomethodsofendotrachealsuctioningopenandclosedinprematureinfantsundermechanicalventilation
AT jannatdoostabdollah 36comparisonofsideeffectsintwomethodsofendotrachealsuctioningopenandclosedinprematureinfantsundermechanicalventilation
AT seyedrasulialehe 36comparisonofsideeffectsintwomethodsofendotrachealsuctioningopenandclosedinprematureinfantsundermechanicalventilation
AT valizadehleila 36comparisonofsideeffectsintwomethodsofendotrachealsuctioningopenandclosedinprematureinfantsundermechanicalventilation
AT sarbakhshparvin 36comparisonofsideeffectsintwomethodsofendotrachealsuctioningopenandclosedinprematureinfantsundermechanicalventilation