Cargando…

175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the basis in which the decisions about pivotal matters in Iranian health system are made and how these decisions are in accordance with the best available evidence. METHODS: To conduct this qualitative study, in the first step, four main issues with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doshmangir, Leila, Rashidian, Arash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.175
_version_ 1783291241979445248
author Doshmangir, Leila
Rashidian, Arash
author_facet Doshmangir, Leila
Rashidian, Arash
author_sort Doshmangir, Leila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the basis in which the decisions about pivotal matters in Iranian health system are made and how these decisions are in accordance with the best available evidence. METHODS: To conduct this qualitative study, in the first step, four main issues with a high degree of importance, novelty and significant impact on health system were selected as follows: outsourcing clinical and Para-clinical services and health sectors to the private sector, global payment system to the hospitals and listing or delisting of pharmaceuticals from insurance coverage. In the next step, along with reviewing reports, documents and papers, semi-structured interviews were conducted with policymakers, experts and officials involved in the formulation and implementation of the selected issues. In the following step, a comprehensive search was carried out to find the research studies on the mentioned topics (fundamental evidence of policy-making). In the final stage, the results of the interviews and documentary analysis were compared with the best acquired evidence from the research studies. As a result, analytical model about decision making and interpretation method of evidence informed policy making in the health system were extracted. RESULTS: In Iranian health system, evidence production is limited and the produced evidence is moderately applied in decision-making. Most decisions are made subconsciously, intuitively, fast, with low cognitive load and based on experiences. In recent years, due to the increasing number of researchers, awareness about modern methods of research and using evidence in decision-making is increasing gradually in the health system. CONCLUSION: Developing the importance and role of using evidence in making better decisions and policies for health managers and policy-makers and localizing global evidence are proper ways to enhance the use of evidence-informed decision-making approach in Iranian health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57596222018-02-12 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE Doshmangir, Leila Rashidian, Arash BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the basis in which the decisions about pivotal matters in Iranian health system are made and how these decisions are in accordance with the best available evidence. METHODS: To conduct this qualitative study, in the first step, four main issues with a high degree of importance, novelty and significant impact on health system were selected as follows: outsourcing clinical and Para-clinical services and health sectors to the private sector, global payment system to the hospitals and listing or delisting of pharmaceuticals from insurance coverage. In the next step, along with reviewing reports, documents and papers, semi-structured interviews were conducted with policymakers, experts and officials involved in the formulation and implementation of the selected issues. In the following step, a comprehensive search was carried out to find the research studies on the mentioned topics (fundamental evidence of policy-making). In the final stage, the results of the interviews and documentary analysis were compared with the best acquired evidence from the research studies. As a result, analytical model about decision making and interpretation method of evidence informed policy making in the health system were extracted. RESULTS: In Iranian health system, evidence production is limited and the produced evidence is moderately applied in decision-making. Most decisions are made subconsciously, intuitively, fast, with low cognitive load and based on experiences. In recent years, due to the increasing number of researchers, awareness about modern methods of research and using evidence in decision-making is increasing gradually in the health system. CONCLUSION: Developing the importance and role of using evidence in making better decisions and policies for health managers and policy-makers and localizing global evidence are proper ways to enhance the use of evidence-informed decision-making approach in Iranian health system. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759622/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.175 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
Doshmangir, Leila
Rashidian, Arash
175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title_full 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title_fullStr 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title_full_unstemmed 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title_short 175: EVALUATING THE PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THE DECISIONS ABOUT PIVOTAL MATTERS IN IRANIAN HEALTH SYSTEM ARE MADE
title_sort 175: evaluating the principles in which the decisions about pivotal matters in iranian health system are made
topic Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759622/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.175
work_keys_str_mv AT doshmangirleila 175evaluatingtheprinciplesinwhichthedecisionsaboutpivotalmattersiniranianhealthsystemaremade
AT rashidianarash 175evaluatingtheprinciplesinwhichthedecisionsaboutpivotalmattersiniranianhealthsystemaremade