Cargando…

144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stroke is the third biggest cause of mortality and the main cause of disability in world. The world health organization (WHO) definition of stroke is a focal neurological deficit (loss of function affecting a specific region of the nervous system) due to disruption of its blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vahdatpour, Tohid, Pourrasmi-Mamaghani, Aniseh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759632/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.144
_version_ 1783291244376489984
author Vahdatpour, Tohid
Pourrasmi-Mamaghani, Aniseh
author_facet Vahdatpour, Tohid
Pourrasmi-Mamaghani, Aniseh
author_sort Vahdatpour, Tohid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stroke is the third biggest cause of mortality and the main cause of disability in world. The world health organization (WHO) definition of stroke is a focal neurological deficit (loss of function affecting a specific region of the nervous system) due to disruption of its blood supply. There is a paucity of evidence describing the best systems of care to allow efficient and rapid assessment and treatment of patients with suspected stroke. Little evidence was identified relating to intensity of physiological monitoring and transmission of information to patients. METHODS: Trials addressing intensity tended to compare continuous physiological monitoring with four to six times daily measurements for a period of 48 to 72 hours. The patients included all had ischemic strokes. The studies did not address monitoring of conscious level or pulse rate as individual items. A prospective study was conducted with ischemic stroke comparing continuous monitoring (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, and temperature) for 72 hours in a stroke unit compared to routine care (less intense monitoring). Monitoring for 48 hours was associated with a lower proportion of patients who died or had a poor outcome at three months. Continuous or frequent physiological monitoring in the acute phase of stroke identifies adverse physiological events that may require intervention. RESULTS: The information provision and educational sessions are more effective than provision of a leaflet alone. Success can be limited if strategies of information provision are unacceptable. The younger patients required more medical information as well as having questions concerning exercise and post-stroke sexual activities. Women ranked receiving information on post-stroke management higher than men. Carers' information requirements also differ with age and sex. Female relatives place more importance on information. Relatives with higher educational level place less importance on counseling. CONCLUSION: Each patient should be individually assessed on his or her readiness to receive information. Healthcare professionals should take a patient's age, gender, educational status and communication support needs into account when assessing their need for information. Information should be offered to patients in a variety of formats, including easy access and repeated and re-offered at appropriate intervals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57596322018-02-12 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS Vahdatpour, Tohid Pourrasmi-Mamaghani, Aniseh BMJ Open Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stroke is the third biggest cause of mortality and the main cause of disability in world. The world health organization (WHO) definition of stroke is a focal neurological deficit (loss of function affecting a specific region of the nervous system) due to disruption of its blood supply. There is a paucity of evidence describing the best systems of care to allow efficient and rapid assessment and treatment of patients with suspected stroke. Little evidence was identified relating to intensity of physiological monitoring and transmission of information to patients. METHODS: Trials addressing intensity tended to compare continuous physiological monitoring with four to six times daily measurements for a period of 48 to 72 hours. The patients included all had ischemic strokes. The studies did not address monitoring of conscious level or pulse rate as individual items. A prospective study was conducted with ischemic stroke comparing continuous monitoring (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, and temperature) for 72 hours in a stroke unit compared to routine care (less intense monitoring). Monitoring for 48 hours was associated with a lower proportion of patients who died or had a poor outcome at three months. Continuous or frequent physiological monitoring in the acute phase of stroke identifies adverse physiological events that may require intervention. RESULTS: The information provision and educational sessions are more effective than provision of a leaflet alone. Success can be limited if strategies of information provision are unacceptable. The younger patients required more medical information as well as having questions concerning exercise and post-stroke sexual activities. Women ranked receiving information on post-stroke management higher than men. Carers' information requirements also differ with age and sex. Female relatives place more importance on information. Relatives with higher educational level place less importance on counseling. CONCLUSION: Each patient should be individually assessed on his or her readiness to receive information. Healthcare professionals should take a patient's age, gender, educational status and communication support needs into account when assessing their need for information. Information should be offered to patients in a variety of formats, including easy access and repeated and re-offered at appropriate intervals. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759632/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.144 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
Vahdatpour, Tohid
Pourrasmi-Mamaghani, Aniseh
144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title_full 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title_fullStr 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title_full_unstemmed 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title_short 144: THE PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ROLE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
title_sort 144: the physiological information role for stroke patients
topic Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Ira
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759632/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.144
work_keys_str_mv AT vahdatpourtohid 144thephysiologicalinformationroleforstrokepatients
AT pourrasmimamaghanianiseh 144thephysiologicalinformationroleforstrokepatients