Cargando…

002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)

BACKGROUND: Academics are asked to collaborate with clinicians and clinicians with patients; getting evidence into practice depends on these collaborations working well. Yet such relationships are not the norm. In this paper, we reflect on our real-life experience of linking qualitative research and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marston, C, Renedo, A, Matthews, R, Filipe, A, Reed, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759644/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.2
_version_ 1783291247158362112
author Marston, C
Renedo, A
Matthews, R
Filipe, A
Reed, J
author_facet Marston, C
Renedo, A
Matthews, R
Filipe, A
Reed, J
author_sort Marston, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Academics are asked to collaborate with clinicians and clinicians with patients; getting evidence into practice depends on these collaborations working well. Yet such relationships are not the norm. In this paper, we reflect on our real-life experience of linking qualitative research and clinical practice in the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London (CLAHRC NWL) – an ambitious project funded by the UK National Institute of Health Research to support collaborations between clinicians, academics, and patients to improve healthcare. We discuss successes and challenges both of doing qualitative research in this context and ways of becoming partners. METHODS: Critical, reflexive dialogues to identify different perspectives about what works well and what brings challenges. FINDINGS: Key challenges and opportunities were connected with the risks associated with new ways of working; differing ideas about purpose, value, and expectations from research; institutional opposition; clashing research paces, language and knowledge backgrounds, particularly relating to impact evaluation and rapid feedback needed to change practice versus broader theory development and ethnography; time needed to develop a shared understanding of the work. Our path was made smoother by shared commitment to dialogical practice and recognition of legitimacy of different partners' knowledge; a long time frame with corresponding resources to identify and resolve issues and create an enabling space for collaboration; preparedness to work iteratively and reflexively; and shared end goal to collaborate and use participatory approaches to strengthen research and improve healthcare. (a)This work originates from independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) programme for North West London. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57596442018-01-12 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a) Marston, C Renedo, A Matthews, R Filipe, A Reed, J BMJ Open Ucl Qualitative Health Research Symposium 2017 BACKGROUND: Academics are asked to collaborate with clinicians and clinicians with patients; getting evidence into practice depends on these collaborations working well. Yet such relationships are not the norm. In this paper, we reflect on our real-life experience of linking qualitative research and clinical practice in the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London (CLAHRC NWL) – an ambitious project funded by the UK National Institute of Health Research to support collaborations between clinicians, academics, and patients to improve healthcare. We discuss successes and challenges both of doing qualitative research in this context and ways of becoming partners. METHODS: Critical, reflexive dialogues to identify different perspectives about what works well and what brings challenges. FINDINGS: Key challenges and opportunities were connected with the risks associated with new ways of working; differing ideas about purpose, value, and expectations from research; institutional opposition; clashing research paces, language and knowledge backgrounds, particularly relating to impact evaluation and rapid feedback needed to change practice versus broader theory development and ethnography; time needed to develop a shared understanding of the work. Our path was made smoother by shared commitment to dialogical practice and recognition of legitimacy of different partners' knowledge; a long time frame with corresponding resources to identify and resolve issues and create an enabling space for collaboration; preparedness to work iteratively and reflexively; and shared end goal to collaborate and use participatory approaches to strengthen research and improve healthcare. (a)This work originates from independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) programme for North West London. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5759644/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.2 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ucl Qualitative Health Research Symposium 2017
Marston, C
Renedo, A
Matthews, R
Filipe, A
Reed, J
002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title_full 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title_fullStr 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title_full_unstemmed 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title_short 002 OP: COLLABORATING FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE ROLE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH(a)
title_sort 002 op: collaborating for better health: the role of qualitative research(a)
topic Ucl Qualitative Health Research Symposium 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759644/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016492.2
work_keys_str_mv AT marstonc 002opcollaboratingforbetterhealththeroleofqualitativeresearcha
AT renedoa 002opcollaboratingforbetterhealththeroleofqualitativeresearcha
AT matthewsr 002opcollaboratingforbetterhealththeroleofqualitativeresearcha
AT filipea 002opcollaboratingforbetterhealththeroleofqualitativeresearcha
AT reedj 002opcollaboratingforbetterhealththeroleofqualitativeresearcha