Cargando…

A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenton, Ashley, Lee, Chee, Lewis, Katrina, Sharma, Maneesh, Kantorovich, Svetlana, Smith, Gregory A, Meshkin, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379313
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189
_version_ 1783291283021758464
author Brenton, Ashley
Lee, Chee
Lewis, Katrina
Sharma, Maneesh
Kantorovich, Svetlana
Smith, Gregory A
Meshkin, Brian
author_facet Brenton, Ashley
Lee, Chee
Lewis, Katrina
Sharma, Maneesh
Kantorovich, Svetlana
Smith, Gregory A
Meshkin, Brian
author_sort Brenton, Ashley
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted to assess the utility of precision medicine testing in 5,397 patients across 100 clinics in the USA. Using a patent-protected, validated algorithm combining specific genetic risk factors with phenotypic traits, patients were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients for opioid abuse. Physicians who ordered precision medicine testing were asked to complete patient evaluations and document their actions, decisions, and perceptions regarding the utility of the precision medicine tests. The patient outcomes associated with each treatment action were carefully documented. RESULTS: Physicians used the profile to guide treatment decisions for over half of the patients. Of those, guided treatment decisions for 24.5% of the patients were opioid related, including changing the opioid prescribed, starting an opioid, or titrating a patient off the opioid. Treatment guidance was strongly influenced by profile-predicted opioid use disorder (OUD) risk. Most importantly, patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, including better pain management by medication adjustments, with an average pain decrease of 3.4 points on a scale of 1–10. CONCLUSION: Patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, as measured by decreased pain levels resulting from better pain management with prescribed medications. The clinical utility of the profile is twofold. It provides clinically actionable recommendations that can be used to 1) prevent OUD through limiting initial opioid prescriptions and 2) reduce pain in patients at low risk of developing OUD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57598572018-01-29 A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder Brenton, Ashley Lee, Chee Lewis, Katrina Sharma, Maneesh Kantorovich, Svetlana Smith, Gregory A Meshkin, Brian J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted to assess the utility of precision medicine testing in 5,397 patients across 100 clinics in the USA. Using a patent-protected, validated algorithm combining specific genetic risk factors with phenotypic traits, patients were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients for opioid abuse. Physicians who ordered precision medicine testing were asked to complete patient evaluations and document their actions, decisions, and perceptions regarding the utility of the precision medicine tests. The patient outcomes associated with each treatment action were carefully documented. RESULTS: Physicians used the profile to guide treatment decisions for over half of the patients. Of those, guided treatment decisions for 24.5% of the patients were opioid related, including changing the opioid prescribed, starting an opioid, or titrating a patient off the opioid. Treatment guidance was strongly influenced by profile-predicted opioid use disorder (OUD) risk. Most importantly, patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, including better pain management by medication adjustments, with an average pain decrease of 3.4 points on a scale of 1–10. CONCLUSION: Patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, as measured by decreased pain levels resulting from better pain management with prescribed medications. The clinical utility of the profile is twofold. It provides clinically actionable recommendations that can be used to 1) prevent OUD through limiting initial opioid prescriptions and 2) reduce pain in patients at low risk of developing OUD. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5759857/ /pubmed/29379313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189 Text en © 2018 Brenton et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brenton, Ashley
Lee, Chee
Lewis, Katrina
Sharma, Maneesh
Kantorovich, Svetlana
Smith, Gregory A
Meshkin, Brian
A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title_full A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title_fullStr A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title_short A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
title_sort prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379313
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189
work_keys_str_mv AT brentonashley aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT leechee aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT lewiskatrina aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT sharmamaneesh aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT kantorovichsvetlana aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT smithgregorya aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT meshkinbrian aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT brentonashley prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT leechee prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT lewiskatrina prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT sharmamaneesh prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT kantorovichsvetlana prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT smithgregorya prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder
AT meshkinbrian prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder