Cargando…
A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189 |
_version_ | 1783291283021758464 |
---|---|
author | Brenton, Ashley Lee, Chee Lewis, Katrina Sharma, Maneesh Kantorovich, Svetlana Smith, Gregory A Meshkin, Brian |
author_facet | Brenton, Ashley Lee, Chee Lewis, Katrina Sharma, Maneesh Kantorovich, Svetlana Smith, Gregory A Meshkin, Brian |
author_sort | Brenton, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted to assess the utility of precision medicine testing in 5,397 patients across 100 clinics in the USA. Using a patent-protected, validated algorithm combining specific genetic risk factors with phenotypic traits, patients were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients for opioid abuse. Physicians who ordered precision medicine testing were asked to complete patient evaluations and document their actions, decisions, and perceptions regarding the utility of the precision medicine tests. The patient outcomes associated with each treatment action were carefully documented. RESULTS: Physicians used the profile to guide treatment decisions for over half of the patients. Of those, guided treatment decisions for 24.5% of the patients were opioid related, including changing the opioid prescribed, starting an opioid, or titrating a patient off the opioid. Treatment guidance was strongly influenced by profile-predicted opioid use disorder (OUD) risk. Most importantly, patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, including better pain management by medication adjustments, with an average pain decrease of 3.4 points on a scale of 1–10. CONCLUSION: Patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, as measured by decreased pain levels resulting from better pain management with prescribed medications. The clinical utility of the profile is twofold. It provides clinically actionable recommendations that can be used to 1) prevent OUD through limiting initial opioid prescriptions and 2) reduce pain in patients at low risk of developing OUD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57598572018-01-29 A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder Brenton, Ashley Lee, Chee Lewis, Katrina Sharma, Maneesh Kantorovich, Svetlana Smith, Gregory A Meshkin, Brian J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of an algorithm-based decision tool designed to assess risk associated with opioid use. Specifically, we sought to assess how physicians were using the profile in patient care and how its use affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted to assess the utility of precision medicine testing in 5,397 patients across 100 clinics in the USA. Using a patent-protected, validated algorithm combining specific genetic risk factors with phenotypic traits, patients were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients for opioid abuse. Physicians who ordered precision medicine testing were asked to complete patient evaluations and document their actions, decisions, and perceptions regarding the utility of the precision medicine tests. The patient outcomes associated with each treatment action were carefully documented. RESULTS: Physicians used the profile to guide treatment decisions for over half of the patients. Of those, guided treatment decisions for 24.5% of the patients were opioid related, including changing the opioid prescribed, starting an opioid, or titrating a patient off the opioid. Treatment guidance was strongly influenced by profile-predicted opioid use disorder (OUD) risk. Most importantly, patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, including better pain management by medication adjustments, with an average pain decrease of 3.4 points on a scale of 1–10. CONCLUSION: Patients whose physicians used the profile to guide opioid-related treatment decisions had improved clinical outcomes, as measured by decreased pain levels resulting from better pain management with prescribed medications. The clinical utility of the profile is twofold. It provides clinically actionable recommendations that can be used to 1) prevent OUD through limiting initial opioid prescriptions and 2) reduce pain in patients at low risk of developing OUD. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5759857/ /pubmed/29379313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189 Text en © 2018 Brenton et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Brenton, Ashley Lee, Chee Lewis, Katrina Sharma, Maneesh Kantorovich, Svetlana Smith, Gregory A Meshkin, Brian A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title | A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title_full | A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title_fullStr | A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title_short | A prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
title_sort | prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the clinical utility of a predictive algorithm that detects risk of opioid use disorder |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29379313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S139189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brentonashley aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT leechee aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT lewiskatrina aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT sharmamaneesh aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT kantorovichsvetlana aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT smithgregorya aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT meshkinbrian aprospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT brentonashley prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT leechee prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT lewiskatrina prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT sharmamaneesh prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT kantorovichsvetlana prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT smithgregorya prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder AT meshkinbrian prospectivelongitudinalstudytoevaluatetheclinicalutilityofapredictivealgorithmthatdetectsriskofopioidusedisorder |