Cargando…

Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison

BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tessonnier, Thomas, Mairani, Andrea, Chen, Wenjing, Sala, Paola, Cerutti, Francesco, Ferrari, Alfredo, Haberer, Thomas, Debus, Jürgen, Parodi, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3
_version_ 1783291284185677824
author Tessonnier, Thomas
Mairani, Andrea
Chen, Wenjing
Sala, Paola
Cerutti, Francesco
Ferrari, Alfredo
Haberer, Thomas
Debus, Jürgen
Parodi, Katia
author_facet Tessonnier, Thomas
Mairani, Andrea
Chen, Wenjing
Sala, Paola
Cerutti, Francesco
Ferrari, Alfredo
Haberer, Thomas
Debus, Jürgen
Parodi, Katia
author_sort Tessonnier, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions, using for the first time a dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning engine (MCTP) thoroughly validated both in terms of physical and biological models. METHODS: Starting from clinical treatment plans of four patients undergoing proton therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy(RBE), new treatment plans were optimized with MCTP for both protons (with variable and fixed RBE) and helium ions (with variable RBE) under the same constraints derived from the initial clinical plans. The resulting dose distributions were dosimetrically compared in terms of dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OARs), as well as dose difference maps. RESULTS: In most of the cases helium ion plans provided a similar PTV coverage as protons with a consistent trend of superior OAR sparing. The latter finding was attributed to the ability of helium ions to offer sharper distal and lateral dose fall-offs, as well as a more favorable differential RBE variation in target and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Although more studies are needed to investigate the clinical potential of helium ions for different tumour entities, the results of this work based on an experimentally validated MC engine support the promise of this modality with state-of-the-art pencil beam scanning delivery, especially in case of tumours growing in close proximity of multiple OARs such as meningiomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5759862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57598622018-01-16 Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison Tessonnier, Thomas Mairani, Andrea Chen, Wenjing Sala, Paola Cerutti, Francesco Ferrari, Alfredo Haberer, Thomas Debus, Jürgen Parodi, Katia Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions, using for the first time a dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning engine (MCTP) thoroughly validated both in terms of physical and biological models. METHODS: Starting from clinical treatment plans of four patients undergoing proton therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy(RBE), new treatment plans were optimized with MCTP for both protons (with variable and fixed RBE) and helium ions (with variable RBE) under the same constraints derived from the initial clinical plans. The resulting dose distributions were dosimetrically compared in terms of dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OARs), as well as dose difference maps. RESULTS: In most of the cases helium ion plans provided a similar PTV coverage as protons with a consistent trend of superior OAR sparing. The latter finding was attributed to the ability of helium ions to offer sharper distal and lateral dose fall-offs, as well as a more favorable differential RBE variation in target and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Although more studies are needed to investigate the clinical potential of helium ions for different tumour entities, the results of this work based on an experimentally validated MC engine support the promise of this modality with state-of-the-art pencil beam scanning delivery, especially in case of tumours growing in close proximity of multiple OARs such as meningiomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5759862/ /pubmed/29316969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tessonnier, Thomas
Mairani, Andrea
Chen, Wenjing
Sala, Paola
Cerutti, Francesco
Ferrari, Alfredo
Haberer, Thomas
Debus, Jürgen
Parodi, Katia
Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title_full Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title_fullStr Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title_full_unstemmed Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title_short Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
title_sort proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a monte carlo-based treatment planning comparison
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tessonnierthomas protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT mairaniandrea protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT chenwenjing protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT salapaola protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT ceruttifrancesco protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT ferrarialfredo protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT habererthomas protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT debusjurgen protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison
AT parodikatia protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison