Cargando…
Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison
BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3 |
_version_ | 1783291284185677824 |
---|---|
author | Tessonnier, Thomas Mairani, Andrea Chen, Wenjing Sala, Paola Cerutti, Francesco Ferrari, Alfredo Haberer, Thomas Debus, Jürgen Parodi, Katia |
author_facet | Tessonnier, Thomas Mairani, Andrea Chen, Wenjing Sala, Paola Cerutti, Francesco Ferrari, Alfredo Haberer, Thomas Debus, Jürgen Parodi, Katia |
author_sort | Tessonnier, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions, using for the first time a dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning engine (MCTP) thoroughly validated both in terms of physical and biological models. METHODS: Starting from clinical treatment plans of four patients undergoing proton therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy(RBE), new treatment plans were optimized with MCTP for both protons (with variable and fixed RBE) and helium ions (with variable RBE) under the same constraints derived from the initial clinical plans. The resulting dose distributions were dosimetrically compared in terms of dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OARs), as well as dose difference maps. RESULTS: In most of the cases helium ion plans provided a similar PTV coverage as protons with a consistent trend of superior OAR sparing. The latter finding was attributed to the ability of helium ions to offer sharper distal and lateral dose fall-offs, as well as a more favorable differential RBE variation in target and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Although more studies are needed to investigate the clinical potential of helium ions for different tumour entities, the results of this work based on an experimentally validated MC engine support the promise of this modality with state-of-the-art pencil beam scanning delivery, especially in case of tumours growing in close proximity of multiple OARs such as meningiomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57598622018-01-16 Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison Tessonnier, Thomas Mairani, Andrea Chen, Wenjing Sala, Paola Cerutti, Francesco Ferrari, Alfredo Haberer, Thomas Debus, Jürgen Parodi, Katia Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Due to their favorable physical and biological properties, helium ion beams are increasingly considered a promising alternative to proton beams for radiation therapy. Hence, this work aims at comparing in-silico the treatment of brain and ocular meningiomas with protons and helium ions, using for the first time a dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning engine (MCTP) thoroughly validated both in terms of physical and biological models. METHODS: Starting from clinical treatment plans of four patients undergoing proton therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy(RBE), new treatment plans were optimized with MCTP for both protons (with variable and fixed RBE) and helium ions (with variable RBE) under the same constraints derived from the initial clinical plans. The resulting dose distributions were dosimetrically compared in terms of dose volume histograms (DVH) parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OARs), as well as dose difference maps. RESULTS: In most of the cases helium ion plans provided a similar PTV coverage as protons with a consistent trend of superior OAR sparing. The latter finding was attributed to the ability of helium ions to offer sharper distal and lateral dose fall-offs, as well as a more favorable differential RBE variation in target and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Although more studies are needed to investigate the clinical potential of helium ions for different tumour entities, the results of this work based on an experimentally validated MC engine support the promise of this modality with state-of-the-art pencil beam scanning delivery, especially in case of tumours growing in close proximity of multiple OARs such as meningiomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5759862/ /pubmed/29316969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tessonnier, Thomas Mairani, Andrea Chen, Wenjing Sala, Paola Cerutti, Francesco Ferrari, Alfredo Haberer, Thomas Debus, Jürgen Parodi, Katia Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title | Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title_full | Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title_fullStr | Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title_short | Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
title_sort | proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a monte carlo-based treatment planning comparison |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0944-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tessonnierthomas protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT mairaniandrea protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT chenwenjing protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT salapaola protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT ceruttifrancesco protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT ferrarialfredo protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT habererthomas protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT debusjurgen protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison AT parodikatia protonandheliumionradiotherapyformeningiomatumorsamontecarlobasedtreatmentplanningcomparison |