Cargando…
Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending
BACKGROUND: Clinical examinations are subjective and often show a low validity and reliability. Objective and highly reliable quantitative assessments are available in laboratory settings using 3D motion analysis, but these systems are too expensive to use for simple clinical examinations. Qinematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1927-0 |
_version_ | 1783291288398856192 |
---|---|
author | Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Sandberg, Lisa Ressman, John Diamantoglou, Nicolas Johansson, Elin Rasmussen-Barr, Eva |
author_facet | Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Sandberg, Lisa Ressman, John Diamantoglou, Nicolas Johansson, Elin Rasmussen-Barr, Eva |
author_sort | Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical examinations are subjective and often show a low validity and reliability. Objective and highly reliable quantitative assessments are available in laboratory settings using 3D motion analysis, but these systems are too expensive to use for simple clinical examinations. Qinematic™ is an interactive movement analyses system based on the Kinect camera and is an easy-to-use clinical measurement system for assessing posture, balance and side-bending. The aim of the study was to test the test-retest the reliability and construct validity of Qinematic™ in a healthy population, and to calculate the minimal clinical differences for the variables of interest. A further aim was to identify the discriminative validity of Qinematic™ in people with low-back pain (LBP). METHODS: We performed a test-retest reliability study (n = 37) with around 1 week between the occasions, a construct validity study (n = 30) in which Qinematic™ was tested against a 3D motion capture system, and a discriminative validity study, in which a group of people with LBP (n = 20) was compared to healthy controls (n = 17). We tested a large range of psychometric properties of 18 variables in three sections: posture (head and pelvic position, weight distribution), balance (sway area and velocity in single- and double-leg stance), and side-bending. RESULTS: The majority of the variables in the posture and balance sections, showed poor/fair reliability (ICC < 0.4) and poor/fair validity (Spearman <0.4), with significant differences between occasions, between Qinematic™ and the 3D–motion capture system. In the clinical study, Qinematic™ did not differ between people with LPB and healthy for these variables. For one variable, side-bending to the left, there was excellent reliability (ICC =0.898), excellent validity (r = 0.943), and Qinematic™ could differentiate between LPB and healthy individuals (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This paper shows that a novel software program (Qinematic™) based on the Kinect camera for measuring balance, posture and side-bending has poor psychometric properties, indicating that the variables on balance and posture should not be used for monitoring individual changes over time or in research. Future research on the dynamic tasks of Qinematic™ is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5759879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57598792018-01-16 Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Sandberg, Lisa Ressman, John Diamantoglou, Nicolas Johansson, Elin Rasmussen-Barr, Eva BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical examinations are subjective and often show a low validity and reliability. Objective and highly reliable quantitative assessments are available in laboratory settings using 3D motion analysis, but these systems are too expensive to use for simple clinical examinations. Qinematic™ is an interactive movement analyses system based on the Kinect camera and is an easy-to-use clinical measurement system for assessing posture, balance and side-bending. The aim of the study was to test the test-retest the reliability and construct validity of Qinematic™ in a healthy population, and to calculate the minimal clinical differences for the variables of interest. A further aim was to identify the discriminative validity of Qinematic™ in people with low-back pain (LBP). METHODS: We performed a test-retest reliability study (n = 37) with around 1 week between the occasions, a construct validity study (n = 30) in which Qinematic™ was tested against a 3D motion capture system, and a discriminative validity study, in which a group of people with LBP (n = 20) was compared to healthy controls (n = 17). We tested a large range of psychometric properties of 18 variables in three sections: posture (head and pelvic position, weight distribution), balance (sway area and velocity in single- and double-leg stance), and side-bending. RESULTS: The majority of the variables in the posture and balance sections, showed poor/fair reliability (ICC < 0.4) and poor/fair validity (Spearman <0.4), with significant differences between occasions, between Qinematic™ and the 3D–motion capture system. In the clinical study, Qinematic™ did not differ between people with LPB and healthy for these variables. For one variable, side-bending to the left, there was excellent reliability (ICC =0.898), excellent validity (r = 0.943), and Qinematic™ could differentiate between LPB and healthy individuals (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This paper shows that a novel software program (Qinematic™) based on the Kinect camera for measuring balance, posture and side-bending has poor psychometric properties, indicating that the variables on balance and posture should not be used for monitoring individual changes over time or in research. Future research on the dynamic tasks of Qinematic™ is warranted. BioMed Central 2018-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5759879/ /pubmed/29310637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1927-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Sandberg, Lisa Ressman, John Diamantoglou, Nicolas Johansson, Elin Rasmussen-Barr, Eva Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title_full | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title_short | Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a novel kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5759879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29310637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1927-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grootenwilhelmusjohannesandreas reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending AT sandberglisa reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending AT ressmanjohn reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending AT diamantoglounicolas reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending AT johanssonelin reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending AT rasmussenbarreva reliabilityandvalidityofanovelkinectbasedsoftwareprogramformeasuringposturebalanceandsidebending |